Older studies can underestimate prognosis of glioblastoma biomarker in meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study for study-level effect in the current literature
There are many potential biomarkers in glioblastoma (GBM), and meta-analyses represent the highest level of evidence when inferring their prognostic significance. It is possible however, that inherent design properties of the studies included in these meta-analyses may affect the pooled hazard ratio (HR) of the meta-analyses. This meta-epidemiological study aims to investigate the potential bias of three study-level properties in meta-analyses of GBM biomarkers currently published in the literature.
Seven electronic databases from inception to December 2017 were searched for meta-analyses evaluating different GBM biomarkers, which were screened against specific criteria. Study-level data were extracted from each meta-analysis, and analyzed using logistic regression to yield the ratio of HR (RHR) summary statistic.
Nine meta-analyses investigating different GBM biomarkers were included. Of all the meta-analyses, the HRs of two studies were significantly underestimated by older studies; they investigated biomarkers IDH1 (RHR = 1.145; p = 0.017) and CD133 (RHR = 0.850; p = 0.013). Study-level size and design showed non-significant trends towards affecting the overall HR in all included meta-analyses.
This meta-epidemiological study demonstrated that study-level year can already significantly affect the pooled HR of GBM biomarkers reported by meta-analyses. It is possible that in the future, more study-level properties will exert significant effect. In terms of future GBM biomarker meta-analyses, special consideration of bias should be given to these study-level properties as potential sources of effect on the prognostic pooled HR.
KeywordsGlioblastoma Biomarker Prognostic Meta-epidemiology Meta-analysis
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors report no funding sources or conflict of interest.
- 3.Savovic J, Harris RJ, Wood L, Beynon R, Altman D, Als-Nielsen B, Balk EM, Deeks J, Gluud LL, Gluud C, Ioannidis JP, Juni P, Moher D, Pildal J, Schulz KF, Sterne JA (2010) Development of a combined database for meta-epidemiological research. Res Synth Methods 1(3–4):212–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.18 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Thuy MN, Kam JK, Lee GC, Tao PL, Ling DQ, Cheng M, Goh SK, Papachristos AJ, Shukla L, Wall KL, Smoll NR, Jones JJ, Gikenye N, Soh B, Moffat B, Johnson N, Drummond KJ (2015) A novel literature-based approach to identify genetic and molecular predictors of survival in glioblastoma multiforme: analysis of 14,678 patients using systematic review and meta-analytical tools. J Clin Neurosci 22(5):785–799CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Levidou G, El-Habr E, Saetta AA, Bamias C, Katsougiannis K, Patsouris E, Korkolopoulou P (2010) P53 immunoexpression as a prognostic marker for human astrocytomas: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. J Neuro-Oncol 100(3):363–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0204-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Yan H, Parsons DW, Jin G, McLendon R, Rasheed BA, Yuan W, Kos I, Batinic-Haberle I, Jones S, Riggins GJ, Friedman H, Friedman A, Reardon D, Herndon J, Kinzler KW, Velculescu VE, Vogelstein B, Bigner DD (2009) IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med 360(8):765–773. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0808710 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Louis D, Ohgak H, Wiestler O, Cavenee W (2016) World Health Organization Histological Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. International Agency for Research on Cancer, LyonGoogle Scholar
- 27.Sterne JAC, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JPA, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, Carpenter J, Rücker G, Harbord RM, Schmid CH, Tetzlaff J, Deeks JJ, Peters J, Macaskill P, Schwarzer G, Duval S, Altman DG, Moher D, Higgins JPT (2011) Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4002 PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 29.Zhu H, Zhang Y, Chen J, Qiu J, Huang K, Wu M, Xia C (2017) IDH1 R132H mutation enhances cell migration by activating AKT-mTOR signaling pathway, but sensitizes cells to 5-FU treatment as NADPH and GSH are reduced. PLoS ONE 12(1):e0169038. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169038 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 30.Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–996. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar