Serum concentrations of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) do not indicate tumor recurrence in patients with glioblastoma
- 155 Downloads
Recent studies identified serum concentrations of the astroglial protein glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) to be indicative of glioblastoma (GBM) in patients with newly diagnosed space occupying cerebral mass lesions. Until now, no data is available whether GFAP serum concentrations decrease after first therapy and whether GFAP may be used as a predictor of survival and an indicator of tumor recurrence. In this prospective study, we included 44 patients with a single space occupying cerebral mass lesion suspicious for GBM. GBM was histopathologically proven in 33 cases. After initial therapy, patients were followed up until tumor recurrence (defined according to the RANO criteria) or death (maximum observation period 78 weeks). Blood was sampled on a regular basis, and GFAP serum levels were determined using an immunofluorescence assay. Prior to any intervention, 14 of the 33 GBM patients had elevated GFAP serum concentrations (median 0.25 µg/L, interquartile range 0.13–0.53), whereas only one out of 11 patients having other tumor entities revealed a slightly increased GFAP serum level (0.06 µg/L). Following surgery (i.e., biopsy, full or partial resection), all initially GFAP positive GBM patients showed decreased serum concentrations. During the follow-up period, we found a minimal GFAP increase in one patient only (0.04 µg/L; week 52), although 23 out of 31 available GBM patients developed tumor progression or died. No difference was found regarding the survival rate and the time to tumor recurrence between initially GFAP positive and GFAP negative GBM patients. In GBM patients, initially elevated GFAP serum concentrations decrease after the first diagnostic or therapeutic intervention. GFAP was not predictive for tumor recurrence.
KeywordsGlioblastoma GFAP Tumor recurrence Biomarker Serum
Central nervous system
Glial fibrillary acidic protein
Fluid attenuated inversion recovery
Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1
Magnet resonance imaging
Primitive neuroectodermal tumor
Response assessment in neuro-oncology
World Health Organization
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conceived and designed the experiments: JV, JT, CF. Performed the experiments: JV, MW. Analyzed the data: JV, JT, JR, CF. Contributed reagents, materials, financial support: CF. Wrote the paper: JV, JT, JR, CF. Supervisor of the study: CF. Corrected and approved the final version of the manuscript: all authors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Mondello S, Papa L, Buki A, Bullock MR, Czeiter E, Tortella FC, Wang KK, Hayes RL (2011) Neuronal and glial markers are differently associated with computed tomography findings and outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a case control study. Crit Care 15:R156. doi: 10.1186/cc10286 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.Luger S, Witsch J, Dietz A, Hamann GF, Minnerup J, Schneider H, Sitzer M, Wartenberg KE, Niessner M, Foerch C, BE FAST II and the IGNITE Study Groups (2017) Glial fibrillary acidic protein serum levels distinguish between intracerebral hemorrhage and cerebral ischemia in the early phase of stroke. Clin Chem 63:377–385. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.263335 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Foerch C, Niessner M, Back T, Bauerle M, De Marchis GM, Ferbert A, Grehl H, Hamann GF, Jacobs A, Kastrup A, Klimpe S, Palm F, Thomalla G, Worthmann H, Sitzer M, Group BFS (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein for differentiating intracerebral hemorrhage and cerebral ischemia in patients with symptoms of acute stroke. Clin Chem 58:237–245. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.172676 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Gallego Perez-Larraya J, Paris S, Idbaih A, Dehais C, Laigle-Donadey F, Navarro S, Capelle L, Mokhtari K, Marie Y, Sanson M, Hoang-Xuan K, Delattre JY, Mallet A (2014) Diagnostic and prognostic value of preoperative combined GFAP, IGFBP-2, and YKL-40 plasma levels in patients with glioblastoma. Cancer 120:3972–3980. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28949 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E, Degroot J, Wick W, Gilbert MR, Lassman AB, Tsien C, Mikkelsen T, Wong ET, Chamberlain MC, Stupp R, Lamborn KR, Vogelbaum MA, van den Bent MJ, Chang SM (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Kiviniemi A, Gardberg M, Frantzen J, Parkkola R, Vuorinen V, Pesola M, Minn H (2015) Serum levels of GFAP and EGFR in primary and recurrent high-grade gliomas: correlation to tumor volume, molecular markers, and progression-free survival. J Neurooncol 124:237–245. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-1829-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Husain H, Savage W, Grossman SA, Ye X, Burger PC, Everett A, Bettegowda C, Diaz LA Jr, Blair C, Romans KE, Holdhoff M (2012) Pre- and post-operative plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein levels in patients with newly diagnosed gliomas. J Neurooncol 109:123–127. doi: 10.1007/s11060-012-0874-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Gurses C, Ekizoglu O, Orhan N, Ustek D, Arican N, Ahishali B, Elmas I, Kucuk M, Bilgic B, Kemikler G, Kalayci R, Karadeniz A, Kaya M (2009) Levetiracetam decreases the seizure activity and blood-brain barrier permeability in pentylenetetrazole-kindled rats with cortical dysplasia. Brain Res 1281:71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.033 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Ostergaard L, Hochberg FH, Rabinov JD, Sorensen AG, Lev M, Kim L, Weisskoff RM, Gonzalez RG, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR (1999) Early changes measured by magnetic resonance imaging in cerebral blood flow, blood volume, and blood-brain barrier permeability following dexamethasone treatment in patients with brain tumors. J Neurosurg 90:300–305. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.90.2.0300 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Kim JH, Bae Kim Y, Han JH, Cho KG, Kim SH, Sheen SS, Lee HW, Jeong SY, Kim BY, Lee KB (2012) Pathologic diagnosis of recurrent glioblastoma: morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 20 paired cases. Am J Surg Pathol 36:620–628. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318246040c CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR, Gokaslan ZL, Shi W, DeMonte F, Lang FF, McCutcheon IE, Hassenbusch SJ, Holland E, Hess K, Michael C, Miller D, Sawaya R (2001) A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 95:190–198. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.95.2.0190 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar