Journal of Neuro-Oncology

, Volume 100, Issue 3, pp 417–426 | Cite as

Surgical treatment of high-grade gliomas in motor areas. The impact of different supportive technologies: a 171-patient series

  • Andrea Talacchi
  • Sergio Turazzi
  • Francesca Locatelli
  • Francesco Sala
  • Alberto Beltramello
  • Franco Alessandrini
  • Paolo Manganotti
  • Paola Lanteri
  • Roberta Gambin
  • Mario Ganau
  • Vincenzo Tramontano
  • Barbara Santini
  • Massimo Gerosa
Clinical Study – Patient Study


In the last few years much has been published to validate new technology in brain mapping for clinical purposes, but there have been few clinical results. In this report we describe our five-year experience in the surgical management of malignant gliomas around motor areas with an evaluation of the impact of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) plus navigator and intraoperative neurophysiology (IN). End-points were extent of removal, morbidity, and survival. Variables describing patient and tumor characteristics and treatment modalities were statistically weighted in relation to treatment outcome. Tumor depth (P = 0.01), midline shift ≥1 cm. (P = 0.05), and insular location (P = 0.001) negatively affected extent of removal, whereas IN (P < 0.001) and fMRI plus navigator (P = 0.02) contributed to increasing the rate of total removal (73%, 71% vs. 40%). Postoperative motor impairment was mild and transient in a minority of cases (20%). General complications, as defined by the Glioma Outcome Project, occurred in 23% of cases. IN was the only factor associated with acute postoperative motor deterioration (P < 0.001). IN and age >65 years (P = 0.01) were associated with the occurrence of complications. Overall survival was significantly higher in patients operated with IN or fMRI plus navigator (P < 0.01). Comparing different surgical strategies used in the same period, we observed that supportive technologies in glioma surgery have their primary impact on the quality of resection and survival. IN led to transient motor impairment and some additional complications which did not affect functional outcome.


Brain tumors Surgical treatment Motor pathways Functional magnetic resonance Intraoperative neurophysiology 


  1. 1.
    Berger MS, Deliganis AV, Dobbins J et al (1994) The effect of extent of resection on recurrence in patients with low grade cerebral hemisphere gliomas. Cancer 74:1784–1791CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR et al (2001) A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 95:190–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laws ER, Parney IF, Huang W, The Gliomas Outcome Investigators et al (2003) Survival following surgery and prognostic factors for recently diagnosed malignant glioma: data from the glioma outcomes project. J Neurosurg 99:467–473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quingley MR, Maroon JC (1991) The relationship between survival and the extent of the resection in patients with supratentorial malignant gliomas. Neurosurgery 29(3):385–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duffau H, Capelle L, Denvil D et al (2003) Usefulness of intraoperative electrical subcortical mapping during surgery for low-grade gliomas located within eloquent brain regions: functional result in a consecutive series of 103 patients. J Neurosurg 98:764–778CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ebeling U, Schmid UD, Ying H et al (1992) Safe surgery of lesions near the motor cortex using intra-operative mapping techniques: a report on 50 patients. Acta Neurochir 119:23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reithmeier T, Krammer M, Gumprecth H et al (2003) Neuronavigation combined with electrophysiological monitoring for surgery of lesions in eloquent brain areas in 42 cases: a retrospective comparison of the neurological outcome and the quality of resection with a control group with a similar lesions. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 46:65–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Russell SM, Elliott R, Forshaw D et al (2005) Resection of parietal lobe gliomas: incidence and evolution of neurological deficits in 28 consecutive patients correlated to the location and morphological characteristics of the tumor. J Neurosurg 103:1010–1017CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dumas-Duport C, Monsaingeon V, Szikla G (1982) Serial stereotactic biopsies: a double histological code of gliomas according to malignancy and 3-D configuration, as an aid to therapeutic decision and assessment of results. Appl Neurophysiol 45:431–437Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kelly PJ, Daumas-Duport C, Scheithauer BW et al (1987) Stereotactic histological correlations of computed tomography- and magnetic resonance imaging-defined abnormalities inpatients with glial neoplasms. Mayo Clin Proc 62:450–459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gumprecht H, Ebel GK, Auer DP et al (2002) Neuronavigation and functional MRI for surgery in patients with lesion in eloquent brain areas. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 45:151–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kamada K, Todo T, Masutani J et al (2005) Combined use of tractography-integrated functional neuronavigation and direct fiber stimulation. J Neurosurg 102:664–672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    King RB, Schell GR (1987) Cortical localization and monitoring during cerebral operations. J Neurosurg 67:210–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roessler K, Donat M, Lanzerberger R et al (2005) Evaluation of preoperative high magnetic field motor functional MRI (3 Tesla) in Glioma patients by navigated electrocortical stimulation and postoperative outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1152–1157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cedzich C, Taniguchi M, Schäfer S et al (1996) Somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal and direct motor cortex stimulation during surgery in and around the central region. Neurosurgery 38(5):962–970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fadul C, Wood J, Thaler H et al (1988) Morbidity and mortality of craniotomy for excision of supratentorial gliomas. Neurology 38:1374–1379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lehéricy S, Duffau H, Cornu P et al (2000) Correspondence between functional magnetic resonance imaging somatotopic and individual brain anatomy of the central region: comparison with intraoperative stimulation in patients with brain tumors. J Neurosurg 92:589–598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sala F, Lanteri P (2003) Brain surgery in motor areas: the invaluable assistance of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. J Neurosurg Sci 47:79–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chang SM, Parney IF, McDermott M, The Gliomas Outcome Investigators et al (2003) Perioperative complications and neurological outcomes of first and second craniotomies among patients enrolled in the glioma outcome project. J Neurosurg 98:1175–1181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sawaya R, Hammoud M, Schoppa D et al (1998) Neurological outcomes in a modern series of 400 craniotomies for treatment of parenchymal tumors. Neurosurgery 42:1044–1056CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Black PM, Ronner SF (1987) Cortical mapping for defining the limits of tumor resection. Neurosurgery 20(6):914–919CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Keles GE, Berger MS (2004) Advances in neurosurgical technique in the current management of brain tumors. Semin Oncol 31:659–665CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meyer FB, Bates LM, Goerss SJ et al (2001) Awake craniotomy for aggressive resection of primary gliomas located in eloquent brain. Mayo Clin Proc 76:677–687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kombos T, Suess O, Ciklatekerlio Ö et al (2001) Monitoring of intraoperative motor evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex. J Neurosurg 95:608–614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Krishnan R, Raabe A, Hattingen E et al (2004) Functional magnetic resonance imaging- integrated Neuronavigation: correlation between lesion-to-motor cortex distance and outcome. Neurosurgery 55(4):904–915CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Neuloh G, Pechstein U, Cedzich C et al (2004) Motor evoked potential monitoring with supratentorial surgery. Neurosurgery 54:1061–1072CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Duffau H, Lopes M, Arthuis F et al (2005) Contribution of intraoperative electrical stimulation in surgery of low gliomas: a comparative study between two series without (1985–96) and with (1996–2003) functional mapping in the same institution. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:845–851CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sobottka SB, Geiger KD, Salzer R et al (2009) Suitability of infrared spectroscopic imaging as an intraoperative tool in cerebral glioma surgery. Anal Bioanal Chem 393:187–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T et al (2006) Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 7:392–401CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jeremic B, Milicic B, Gruijcic D et al (2004) Clinical prognostic factors in patients with malignant glioma treated with combined modality approach. Am J Clin Oncol 27:195–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Devaux BC, O’Fallon JR, Kelly PJ (1993) Resection, biopsy, and survival in malignant glial neoplasms. A retrospective study of clinical parameters, therapy, and outcome. J Neurosurg 78:767–775CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vecht CJ, Avezaat CJJ, van Putten WLJ et al (1990) The influence of the extent of surgery on the neurological function and survival in malignant glioma. A retrospective analysis in 243. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 53:466–471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Skirboll SS, Ojemann GA, Berger MS et al (1996) Functional cortex and subcortical white matter located within gliomas. Neurosurgery 38(4):678–685CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Berger M (1995) Functional mapping-guided resection of low-grade gliomas. Clin Neurosurg 42:437–456PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Berger MS, Ojemann GA (1991) Intraoperative brain mapping techniques in neuro-oncology. Epilepsy 58:153–161Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Brell M, Ibáñez J, Caral L et al (2000) Factors influencing complications of intra-axial brain tumours. Acta Neurochir 142:739–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Neuloh G, Pechstein U, Schramm J (2007) Motor tract monitoring during insular glioma surgery. J Neurosurg 106:582–592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Keles GE, Lundin DA, Lamborn KR et al (2004) Intraoperative subcortical stimulation mapping for hemispherical periolandic glioma located within or adjacent to the descending motor pathways: evaluation of morbidity and assessment of functional outcome in 294 patients. J Neurosurg 100:369–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mc Girt MJ, Chaichana KL, Gathinji M et al (2009) Independent association of extent of resection with survival in patients with malignant brain astrocytoma. J Neurosurg 110:156–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stummer W, Reulen HJ, Meinel T et al (2008) Extent of resection and survival in glioblastoma multiforme: identification of and adjustment for bias. Neurosurgery 62:564–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Van den Bent MJ, Hegi ME, Stupp R (2006) Recent developments in the use of chemotherapy in brain tumors. Eur J Cancer 42:582–588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Talacchi
    • 1
    • 7
  • Sergio Turazzi
    • 2
  • Francesca Locatelli
    • 3
  • Francesco Sala
    • 1
  • Alberto Beltramello
    • 5
  • Franco Alessandrini
    • 5
  • Paolo Manganotti
    • 4
  • Paola Lanteri
    • 6
  • Roberta Gambin
    • 2
  • Mario Ganau
    • 1
  • Vincenzo Tramontano
    • 1
  • Barbara Santini
    • 1
  • Massimo Gerosa
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Sciences and VisionUniversity HospitalVeronaItaly
  2. 2.Division of NeurosurgeryUniversity HospitalVeronaItaly
  3. 3.Section of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Hygiene and Public HealthUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
  4. 4.Section of Neurology, Department of Neurological Sciences and VisionUniversity HospitalVeronaItaly
  5. 5.Division of NeuroradiologyUniversity HospitalVeronaItaly
  6. 6.Division of Neurology“Sacro Cuore” HospitalNegrarItaly
  7. 7.Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Sciences and VisionUniversity HospitalVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations