Abstract
The official definition for alexithymia dates back to 1973, when Sifneos described its symptoms. Persons affected by this condition are unable to verbally describe their feelings. For many years this condition was relatively little known, but nowadays people are talking about it more and more. In forums in which the patients’ comments are posted, it is often underscored how this particular mental state is similar to that of the androids described in the novel Do androids dream of electric sheep? by Philip K. Dick. The Dickian clinical references were those in use during the 1960s. Therefore, to special characteristics that Philip Dick attributed to his robots (coldness and lack of human empathy, and simultaneous desire for social acceptance), the writer, and then the critics, assigned the label of schizophrenia, the only one that the psychiatric manuals of that time associated to such symptoms. Today, if Dick were alive and were to write about his androids, he most likely would no longer use the term schizophrenics, but instead the term alexithymics, which are more socially adaptive than schizophrenics, just like his androids. Making retrospective diagnoses of literary characters is anachronistic; as it was done for decades by critics to consider the Dickian androids schizophrenics: in the fiction story they are not schizophrenics but robots. However a new psychological trait such as alexithymia can revisit that same story by giving it a new symbolic meaning. The aims of this article are: to highlight how the old nosological categories of schizophrenia, generally referred to when commenting Do androids dream of electric sheep?, should be supplemented by the category of alexithymia; to analyze the scenes in which the characters have typical alexithymic behaviors, trying to prove that alexithymia is actually best suited for describing the androids invented by Dick.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Dick writes about the Benjamin Proverd Test in We can build you (1972) and in The transmigration of Timothy Archer (1982) too. The fictitious Voigt-Kampff test is very similar to the Awkward Moments Test (Heavey et al. 2000) to measure the social understanding in autistic people.
The reference to Wilder Penfield (1891–1976), an American neurologist, appears correctly in We can build you (1972), when brain mapping is mentioned.
http://www.flavinscorner.com/9-17-99.htm. Other references can be found in https://francescacaon.com/2015/08/25/lalexitimia-lemozione-non-ha-voce, and in http://brontisorengo.blogspot.com/2011/04/.
References
American Psychiatric Association [APA]. (1952). Diagnostic and statistical manual mental disorders [DSM-1]. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Mental Hospital Service.
American Psychiatric Association [APA]. (2013). DSM 5. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Berman, M. (2006). Images of absence in PK Dick’s Do androids dream of electric sheep?. Literature and Aesthetics, 16(2), 75–94.
Cecchetto, C., Korb, S., Rumiati, R. I., & Aiello, M. (2018). Emotional reactions in moral decision-making are influenced by empathy and alexithymia. Social Neuroscience, 13(2), 226–240.
Chiappetti, F. (2000). Visioni dal futuro. Il caso di Philip K. Dick. Santarcangelo di Romagna: Fara Editore.
Dick, P. K. (1968). Do androids dream of electric sheep?. London: Gollancz.
Enns, A. (2006). Media, drugs, and schizophrenia in the works of Philip K. Dick. Science Fiction Studies, 33(1), 68–88.
Fava, G. A., Freyberger, H. J., Bech, P., Christodoulou, G., Sensky, T., Theorell, T., et al. (2002). Diagnostic criteria for use in psychosomatic research. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 63(1), 1–8.
Gramantieri, R. (2019). A timeline of psychiatry in the novels of Philip K. Dick. MOSF Journal of Science Fiction, 3(3), 67–83.
Heavey, L., Phillips, W., Baron-Cohen, S., & Rutter, M. (2000). The awkward moments test: A naturalistic measure of social understanding in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 225–236.
Hoppe, K. D. (1977). Split brain and psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 46(2), 220–244.
Kafetsios, K., & Hess, U. (2019). Seeing mixed emotions: Alexithymia, emotion perception bias, and quality in dyadic interactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 137, 80–85.
Krystal, H. (1988). Integration and self healing: Affect, trauma, alexithymia. New York: Routledge.
Lingiardi, V., & McWilliams, N. (Eds.). (2017). Psychodynamic diagnostic manual: PDM-2. New York-London: Guilford Press.
Liotti, M., & Panksepp, J. (2004). On the neural nature of human emotions and implications for biological psychiatry. In J. Panksepp (Ed.), Textbook of biological psychiatry (pp. 33–74). New York: Wiley.
McCracken, T. (2013). Apathy in literature: A discourse on emotionless characters and concepts. Druck/Herstellung: Anchor Academic Publishing.
McDougall, J. (1974). The psychosoma and psychoanalytic process. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 1(4), 437–459.
Nemiah, J. C. (1975). Denial revisited: Reflections on the psychosomatic theory. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 26(3), 140–147.
Nemiah, J. C., Freyberger, H., & Sifneos, P. (1976). Alexithymia: A view of the psychosomatic process. In O. W. Hill (Ed.), Modern trends in medicine (Vol. III, pp. 430–436). London: Butteerwoth.
PDM Task Force. (2006). Psychodynamic diagnostic manual (PDM). Alliance of Psychoanalytic Organizations.
Rickman, G. (1989). To the high castle. Philip K. Dick: A life 1928–1982. Long Beach CA: Fragments West/The Valentine Press.
Rickman, G. (1995). “What is this sickness?”: “Schizophrenia” and we can build you. In S. J. Umland (Ed.), Philip K. Dick. Contemporary critical interpretations (pp. 143–156). Westport CT: Greenwod Press.
Sims, C. A. (2009). The dangers of individualism and the human relationship to technology in Philip K. Dick’s Do androids dream of electric sheep? Science Fiction Studies, 36(1), 67–86.
Starita, F., & Di Pellegrino, G. (2018). Alexithymia and the reduced ability to represent the value of aversively motivated actions. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02587.
Stephanos, S. (1975). A concept of analytical treatment for patients with psychosomatic disorders. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 26(3), 178–187.
Sutin, L. (1991). Divine invasions. New York: Citadel Twilight.
Toth, J. (2013). Do androids eat electric sheep?: Egotism, empathy, and the ethics of eating in the work of Philip K. Dick. Literature Interpretation Theory, 24(1), 65–85.
Warrick, P. S. (1987). Mind in motion: The fiction of Philip K. Dick. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Wolk, A. (1995). The Swiss connection: Psychological systems in the novels of Philip K. Dick. In S. J. Umland (Ed.), Philip K. Dick. Contemporary critical interpretations (pp. 101–126). Westport CT: Greenwod Press.
Zimmerman, M. (2015). Authenticity, duty, and empathy in Do androids dream of electric sheep? In H. Pedersen & M. Altman (Eds.), Horizons of authenticity in phenomenology, existentialism, and moral psychology (pp. 75–92). Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gramantieri, R. Alexithymic personality in Philip K. Dick’s Do androids dream of electric sheep?. Neohelicon 47, 673–683 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-020-00544-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-020-00544-z