Skip to main content
Log in

Unnatural emotions in contemporary narrative fiction

  • Published:
Neohelicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The beginning of the twenty-first century witnessed not only an “affective turn” in contemporary fiction but also an “affective turn” in literary criticism. In the current scholarship of emotion studies, critics mainly focus on the mimetic aspects of emotion from a cognitive perspective while neglecting its antimimetic aspects. This article argues that not all stories are created by the normal and usual emotions. Instead, there exist so-called unnatural emotions in contemporary avant-garde and antimimetic narratives, which are physically, logically, or humanly impossible. Through presenting unnatural emotions, contemporary avant-garde narratives not only foreground the fictionality of unnatural narratives but also generate defamiliarizing effects. Taking Ian McEwan’s “Dead as They Come” as an example, the article proposes a synthetic approach to unnatural emotions by combining both naturalizing reading strategies and unnaturalizing reading strategies, so as to make the unnatural narrative work readable without losing its unnaturalness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alber, J. (2009). Impossible storyworlds—and what to do with them. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, 1(1), 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alber, J. (2011). The diachronic development of unnaturalness: A new view on genre. In J. Alber & R. Heinze (Eds.), Unnatural narratives, unnatural narratology (pp. 42–67). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alber, J. (2012). Unnatural temporalities: Interfaces between postmodernism, science fiction, and the fantastic. In M. Lehtimäki, L. Karttunen, & M. Mäkelä (Eds.), Narrative interrupted: The plotless, the disturbing and the trivial in literature (pp. 174–191). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alber, J. (2013). Unnatural narratology: The systematic study of anti-mimeticism. Literature Compass, 10(5), 449–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alber, J. (2016). Unnatural narrative: Impossible worlds in fiction and drama. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alber, J., & Hansen, P. K. (2014). Introduction: Transmedial and unnatural narratology. In J. Alber & P. K. Hansen (Eds.), Beyond classical narration: Transmedial and unnatural challenges (pp. 1–14). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alber, J., & Heinze, R. (2011). Introduction. In J. Alber & R. Heinze (Eds.), Unnatural narratives, unnatural narratology (pp. 1–19). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alber, J., Iversen, S., Nielsen, H. S., & Richardson, B. (2010). Unnatural narratives, unnatural narratology: Beyond mimetic models. Narrative, 18(2), 113–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alber, J., Iversen, S., Nielsen, H. S., & Richardson, B. (2013). Introduction. In J. Alber, H. S. Nielsen, & B. Richardson (Eds.), A poetics of unnatural narrative (pp. 1–15). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alber, J., Nielsen, H. S., & Richardson, B. (2012). Unnatural voices, minds and narration. In J. Bray, A. Gibbsons, & B. McHale (Eds.), The Routledge companion to experimental literature (pp. 351–367). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andringa, E. (1996). Effects of “narrative distance” on readers’ emotional involvement and response. Poetics, 23(6), 431–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J. (1990). A history of the world in 10 1/2 chapters. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J. (2012). The sense of an ending. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. (2009). Surrealist encounters in Ian McEwan’s early work. In S. Groes (Ed.), Ian McEwan: Contemporary critical perspectives (pp. 13–25). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. (2016). Interactional metalepsis and unnatural narratology. Narrative, 42(3), 294–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A., & Alber, J. (2012). Ontological metalepsis and unnatural narratology. Journal of Narrative Theory, 42(2), 166–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernaerts, L., Caracciolo, M., Herman, L., & Vervaeck, B. (2014). The storied lives of non-human narrators. Narrative, 22(1), 68–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourg, T. (1996). The role of emotion, empathy, and text structure in children’s and adults’ narrative text comprehension. In R. J. Kreuz & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 241–260). Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, P. T., & Halley, J. (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, R. S. (1953). The languages of criticism and the structure of poetry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dames, N. (2004). Wave theories and affective psychologies: The cognitive strain in Victorian novel theories. Victorian Studies, 46(2), 206–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dames, N. (2007). The physiology of the novel: Reading, neural science and the form of Victorian fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feagin, S. L. (1996). Reading with feeling: The aesthetics of appreciation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fludernik, M. (2010). Naturalizing the unnatural: A view from blending theory. Journal of Literary Semantics, 39(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fludernik, M. (2012). How natural is “unnatural narratology”; or, what is unnatural about unnatural narratology? Narrative, 20(3), 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, D. (2013). Storyworlds—and storyworlds—in transition. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, 5(5), vii–xi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, P. C. (2003). The mind and its stories: Narrative universals and human emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, P. C. (2007). The brain in love: A case study of cognitive neuroscience and literary theory. Journal of Literary Theory, 1(2), 339–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, P. C. (2011). Affective narratology: The emotional structure of stories. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, P. C. (2013). How authors’ minds make stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, S. (2011). “In faming flames”: Crises of experientiality in non-fictional narratives. In J. Alber & R. Heinze (Eds.), Unnatural narratives, unnatural narratology (pp. 89–103). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, S. (2013). Unnatural minds. In J. Alber, H. S. Nielsen, & B. Richardson (Eds.), A poetics of unnatural narrative (pp. 94–112). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K. A., & Wallace, M. L. (2015). Introduction: Facing emotions. PMLA, 130(5), 1249–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, R. (2008). Wolf totem. Trans. Howard Goldblatt. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, S. (2006). A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative, 14(3), 207–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, S. (2011). Introduction: Narrative and the emotions. Poetics Today, 32(1), 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klauk, T., & Köppe, T. (2013). Reassessing unnatural narratology: Problems and prospects. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Theory, 5(5), 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiswirth, M. (2005). Narrative turn in the humanities. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 377–382). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäkelä, M. (2013). Realism and the unnatural. In J. Alber, H. S. Nielsen, & B. Richardson (Eds.), A poetics of unnatural narrative (pp. 142–166). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, I. (1978). In between the sheets. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, D. S. (1989). Beyond the schema given: Affective comprehension of literary narratives. Cognition and Emotion, 3(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miall, D. S. (2006). Literary reading: Empirical and theoretical studies. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, D. S. (2007). Feeling from the perspective of the empirical study of literature. Journal of Literary Theory, 1(2), 377–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, D. S. (2008). Foregrounding and feeling in response to narrative. In S. Zyngier, M. Bortolussi, A. Chesnokova, & J. Auracher (Eds.), Directions in empirical literary studies: Essays in honor of Willie van Peer (pp. 89–102). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, H. S. (2014). The unnatural in E.A. Poe’s “The Oval Portrait.” In J. Alber & P. K. Hansen (Eds.), Beyond classical narration: Transmedial and unnatural challenges (pp. 239–260). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nünning, A. (1997). “But why will you say that I am mad?” On the theory, history and signals of unreliable narration in British fiction. AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 22(1), 83–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oatley, K. (2004). Emotions: A brief history. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pamuk, O. (2002). My name is red (E. Göknar, Trans.). Vintage: New York.

  • Phelan, J. (2005). Living to tell about it: Rhetoric and ethics of character narration. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, J. (2007). Experiencing fiction: Judgments, progression, and the rhetorical theory of narrative. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, J. (2013). Implausibilities, crossovers, and impossibilities: A rhetorical approach to breaks in the code of mimetic character narration. In J. Alber, H. S. Nielsen, & B. Richardson (Eds.), A poetics of unnatural narrative (pp. 167–184). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirlet, C. (2011). Toward a hybrid approach to the unnatural: “Reading for the consciousness” and the psychodynamics of experientiality in Caryl Churchill’s Heart’s Desire. In J. Alber & R. Heinze (Eds.), Unnatural narratives, unnatural narratology (pp. 104–126). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, I. A. (1924/2001). Principles of literary criticism (J. Constable, Ed.). London and New York: Routledge.

  • Richardson, B. (2012). Response. In D. Herman, J. Phelan, P. J. Rabinowitz, B. Richardson, & R. R. Warhol (Eds.), Narrative theory: Core concepts and critical debates (pp. 235–249). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B. (2015). Unnatural narrative: Theory, history, and practice. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2005). Deeper than reason: Emotion and its role in literature, music, and art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2010). Emotion and the understanding of narrative. In G. L. Hagberg & W. Jost (Eds.), A companion to the philosophy of literature (pp. 71–92). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, K. (1994). Ian McEwan. Plymouth: Northcote House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M.-L. (2012). Impossible worlds. In J. Bray, A. Gibbsons, & B. McHale (Eds.), The Routledge companion to experimental literature (pp. 368–379). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang, B. W. (2015). Unnatural narratology: Core issues and critical debates. Journal of Literary Semantics, 44(2), 169–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, H. (2009). Narrative structuring of sympathetic response: Theoretical and empirical approaches to Toni Cade Bambara’s “The Hammer Man.” Poetics Today, 30(3), 561–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slay, J., Jr. (1995). The absurdity of love: Parodic relationships in Ian McEwan’s “Reflections of a Kept Ape” and “Dead as They Come.” Notes on Contemporary Literature, 25(3), 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R. (1997). Why we wept for Little Nell: Character and emotional involvement. Narrative, 5(3), 306–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W. K., & Beardsley, M. (1946). The affective fallacy. In The verbal icon: Studies in the meaning of poetry (pp. 21–39). Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant Number: 17ZDA281).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biwu Shang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shang, B. Unnatural emotions in contemporary narrative fiction. Neohelicon 45, 445–459 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-018-0455-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-018-0455-8

Keywords

Navigation