Advertisement

Neohelicon

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 493–527 | Cite as

Constructive art “à la Ehrenburg”: Vešč’GegenstandObjet

  • Ben Dhooge
Article

Abstract

In 1922 El Lissitzky and Il’ya Ehrenburg published the Avant-Garde art journal Vešč’–Gegenstand–Objet. The journal is considered a modernist landmark for its innovative and trend-setting layout, its remarkable cosmopolitan opening statement calling for a new international art community that would break the barriers between Europe and Russia, its multilingualism and its role in the formation of European constructivism. The journal project has received quite a lot of scholarly attention in the past, but the literary section of the journal remains largely unexplored. Nonetheless, this section stands out within the journal for it is far from multilingual and sometimes even far from avant-gardist. The present paper will shed light on the specificities of the literary section of the journal and on Ehrenburg’s peculiar approach as an editor of radical modernist literature by focusing on those elements of the journal that are mostly ignored or read in a selective way—the opening statement of the journal, the editorial writings and the announcements regarding what contributions the readers could expect in the following issues of the journal.

Keywords

Ehrenburg Vešč’–Gegenstand–Objet Avant-Garde Compilation Russian Internationalism Falsification 

References

  1. Bann, S. (Ed.). (1974). The tradition of constructivism. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bury, S. (2013). ‘Not to adorn life but to organize it’: Veshch. Gegenstand. Objet: Revue internationale de l’art moderne (1922), G (1923–6). In P. Brooker, S. Bru, A. Thacker, & C. Weikop (Eds.), The Oxford critical and cultural history of modernist magazines,Vol III: Europe 1880–1940. Part I (pp. 855–867). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Conio, G. (1987). Le constructivisme russe. Tome premier: Le constructivisme dans les arts plastiques. Lausanne: L’âge d’homme.Google Scholar
  4. Epstein, J. (1921). La poésie d’aujourd’hui: un nouvel état d’intelligence. Lettre-postface de Blaise Cendrars. Paris: La Sirène.Google Scholar
  5. Evers, B. (1989). Eine neue Kunstzeitschrift, wie wir sie brauchen. In L. S. Malke (Ed.), Europäische Moderne: Buch und Graphik aus Berliner Kunstverlagen 1890–1933 (pp. 51–62). Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Frommenwiler, R. (1994). Annotations to Vešč’ Objet Gegenstand. In Il’ja Ėrenburg/Ėl Lisickij, Vešč’ Objet Gegenstand. Kommentar und Übertragungen (pp. 49–159). Baden: Verlag Lars Müller.Google Scholar
  7. Gilman, C. J. (2011). Killing culture two: toward an anatomy of cultural transformation in early soviet Russia, 1920s1930s. Dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  8. Gough, M. (2010). Contains graphic material: El Lissitzky and the topography of G. In D. Mertins & M. W. Jennings (Eds.), G: An avant-garde journal of art, architecture, design, and film. 1923–1926 (pp. 21–51). London, Los Angeles: Tate Publishing, Getty Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Hodgson, K. (1994). Myth-making in Russian war poetry. In J. Howlett & R. Mengham (Eds.), The violent Muse: Violence and the artistic imagination in Europe, 1910–1939 (pp. 65–76). Manchester, New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lodder, Ch. (1987). Russian constructivism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Margolin, V. (1997). The struggle for utopia: Rodchenko, Lissitzky, Moholy-Nagy 1917–1946. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Marten-Finnis, S., & Duchan, I. (2008). Transnationale Öffentlichkeit im Russischen Berlin Die Avantgarde-Zeitschrift Veshch-Gegenstand-Objet, 1922. Osteuropa, 58(3), 37–48.Google Scholar
  13. Mertins, D., & Jennings, M. W. (2010). Introduction: The G-groups and the European avant-garde. In D. Mertins & M. W. Jennings (Eds.), G: An avant-garde journal of art, architecture, design, and film. 1923–1926 (pp. 3–20). London, Los Angeles: Tate Publishing, Getty Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Mierau, F. (1990). Russen in Berlin Literatur. Malerei. Theater. Film. 1918–1933. Leipzig: Verlag Philipp Reclam.Google Scholar
  15. Nachtigäller, R., & Gassner, H. (1994). 3x1 = 1. Vešč’ Objet Gegenstand. In Il’ja Ėrenburg/Ėl Lisickij. Vešč’ Objet Gegenstand (pp. 29–46). Baden: Verlag Lars Müller.Google Scholar
  16. Rubenstein, J. (1996). Tangled loyalties. The life and times of Ilya Ehrenburg. London: Tauris Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Siegel, H. (1979a). Zum Verhältnis von Technik und Ästhetik bei Il’ja Ėrenburg in den Jahren 1917–1934. In G. Erler, R. Grübel, K. Manicke-Gyongyosi, & P. Scherber (Eds.), Von der Revolution zum Schriftstellerkongress: Entwicklungsstrukturen und Funktionsbestimmungen der russischen Literatur und Kultur zwischen 1917 und 1934 (pp. 373–390). Berlin: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
  18. Siegel, H. (1979b). Ästhetische Theorie und künstlerische Praxis bei Il’ja Ėrenburg, 1921–1932. Studien zum Verhältnis von Kunst und Revolution. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Walravens, H. (1989). Russische Kunstverlage in Berlin. In L. S. Malke (Ed.), Europäische Moderne: Buch und Graphik aus Berliner Kunstverlagen 1890–1933 (pp. 125–140). Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.Google Scholar
  20. Apвaтoв, Б. (1922) Beщь. Пeчaть и peвoлюция, №7, 342.Google Scholar
  21. Baйнбepг, И. (1996). Жизнь и гибeль бepлинcкoгo жypнaлa Гopькoгo “Бeceдa” (пo нeизвecтным apxивным мaтepиaлaм и нeиздaннoй пepeпиcкe). Hoвoe литepaтypнoe oбoзpeниe, №21, 361–376.Google Scholar
  22. Кopниeнкo, H. B. (2010). “Hэпoвcкaя oттeпeль”. Cтaнoвлeниe инcтитyтa coвeтcкoй литepaтypнoй кpитики. Mocквa: ИMЛИ PAH.Google Scholar
  23. Лaвpeнтьeв, A. (2010). Beщь кaк вeщь. Пpилoжeниe к Beщь. Mocквa: C. Э. Гopдeeв.Google Scholar
  24. Moлoк, Ю. (2000). Бepлинcкий жypнaл Beщь и eгo pyccкиe кpитики. In Г. Ф. Кoвaлeнкo (Ed.), Pyccкий aвaнгapд 19101920-x гoдoв в eвpoпeйcкoм кoнтeкcтe (pp. 299–307). Mocквa: Hayкa.Google Scholar
  25. Пoпoв, B., & Фpeзинcкий, Б. (Eds.) (1993). Илья Эpeнбypг: xpoникa жизни и твopчecтвa в дoкyмeнтax, пиcьмax, выcкaзывaнияx и cooбщeнияx пpeccы, cвидeтeльcтвax coвpeмeнникoв, тoм 1. Caнкт-Пeтepбypг: Линa.Google Scholar
  26. Pyбaшкин, A. (2002). Илья Эpeнбypг o pyccкиx пoэтax и пoэзии. In Илья Эpeнбypг, Пopтpeты pyccкиx пoэтoв (pp. 291–314). Caнкт-Пeтepбypг: Hayкa.Google Scholar
  27. Фpeзинcкий, Б. (1992) Эpeнбypг. “Beщь”. Maякoвcкий. Boпpocы литepaтypы, № 3 (1992), 299–311.Google Scholar
  28. Фpeзинcкий, Б. (2004). Илья Эpeнбypг и Гepмaния. Звeздa, № 9 (2004), 192–208.Google Scholar
  29. Xлeбникoв, B. (1986), Tвopeния. Mocквa: Coвeтcкий пиcaтeль.Google Scholar
  30. Шклoвcкий, B. (1964). Жили-были. Mocквa: Сoвeтcкий пиcaтeль.Google Scholar
  31. Эpeнбypг, И. (1922). A вce-тaки oнa вepтитcя. Mocквa, Бepлин: Гeликoн.Google Scholar
  32. Эpeнбypг, И. (1990). Люди, гoды, жизнь. Bocпoминaния, Toм 1. Mocквa: Coвeтcкий пиcaтeль.Google Scholar
  33. Эpeнбypг, И. (2000). Пopтpeты pyccкиx пoэтoв. Caнкт-Пeтepбypг: Hayкa.Google Scholar
  34. Эpeнбypг, И. (2004). Пиcьмa 19081967 в двyx тoмax. Toм 1, Дaй oглянyтьcя: пиcьмa 19081930. Mocквa: Aгpaф.Google Scholar
  35. Эpeнбypг, И. (2006). Я cлышy вce…: пoчтa Ильи Эpeнбypгa, 1916–1967. Mocквa: Aгpaф.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Foundation—Flanders & Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations