Advertisement

Neohelicon

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 461–474 | Cite as

Traveling possible words in graphic narratives: The example of Watchmen (Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons)

  • Clotilde Thouret
Article
  • 721 Downloads

Abstract

This article tries out the literary theory of possible worlds in graphic narratives through the example of Watchmen. It shows that it is a powerful tool to explain how the basic form of the comic, articulating a diegetic sequence with coexisting panels, can build reference to different worlds and give the reader access to worlds that are symbolically, logically or ontologically different from the actual world. Joining together different fictional worlds, intertwining many narratives, and actualizing a passage of the superhero from fiction to reality, Watchmen is at the same time an alternative history, a parody and a metafiction. Far from being a cerebral experience, the intense circulation between worlds builds immersion in fiction and, in the case of this particular comic book, leads pragmatically to a critique of the superhero figure and the political order it is attached to.

Keywords

Watchmen Graphic narratives Superhero Utopia/dystopia Alternative history Literary theory of possible worlds Transfictionality 

References

  1. Buscema, J., & Lee, S. (1978). How to draw comics the marvel way. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  2. Citton, Y. (2010). Mythocratie. Storytelling et imaginaire de gauche. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  3. Doležel, L. (2010). Récits contrefactuels du passé. In F. Lavocat (Ed.), La théorie littéraire des mondes possibles (pp. 83–100). Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
  4. Gabilliet, J.-P. (2005). Des Comics et des hommes. Histoire culturelle des comic books aux Etats-Unis. Nantes: Éditions du Temps.Google Scholar
  5. Gibbons, D., & Moore, A. (1987). Watchmen (1986–1987). London: Titan Books.Google Scholar
  6. Groensteen, T. (1999). Système de la bande dessinée. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  7. Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lavocat, F. (2010). Les genres de la fiction. État des lieux et propositions. In F. Lavocat (Ed.), La théorie littéraire des mondes possibles (pp. 15–51). Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
  9. Mikkonen, K. (2008). Presenting minds in graphic narratives. Partial Answers, 6(2), 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Moore, A. (2000). The Alan Moore interview, Interview of Barry Kavanagh with Alan Moore, 17th october 2000. Blather: http://www.blather.net/articles/amoore/watchmen3.html. Accessed 28 Sept 2011.
  11. Paik, P. Y. (2010). From Utopia to Apocalypse. Science fiction and the politics of catastrophe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Pasquier, R., & Thouret, C. (2006). Watchmen, à deux voix. Labyrinthe 25: 69–82. http://labyrinthe.revues.org/index1409.html. Accessed 28 Sept 2011.Google Scholar
  13. Ryan, M.-L. (1991). Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ryan, M.-L. (2010). Cosmologie du récit. Des mondes possibles aux univers parallèles. In F. Lavocat (Ed.), La théorie littéraire des mondes possibles (pp. 53–82). Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
  15. Saint-Gelais, R. (2011). Fictions transfuges. La transfictionnalité et ses enjeux. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  16. Salanskis, J.-M. (2007). Fiction des mondes. Alliage 60. http://www.tribunes.com/tribune/alliage/60/Salanskis.html. Accessed 28 Sept 2011.

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations