New Forests

, Volume 45, Issue 6, pp 843–857 | Cite as

Are small-scale overstory gaps effective in promoting the development of regenerating oaks (Quercus ithaburensis) in the forest understory?

  • Arnon Cooper
  • Yossi Moshe
  • Ela Zangi
  • Yagil Osem


We investigated the effect of small-scale overstory gaps on the ecophysiology and growth of Quercus ithaburensis saplings. The study aim was to characterize how changes in daily exposure to direct beam radiation affect photosynthetic performance in the short term and growth and biomass partitioning in the long term. Using individual net-houses, the following treatments were applied: (a) Unshaded (daily irradiance = 100 %), (b) shading net with no gap (Shade-daily irradiance = 6 %), (c) shading net with 1 h gap allowing direct beam radiation (11:00 am–12:00 pm, Shade+1-irradiance = 20 %), (d) shading net with 3 h gap (11:00 am–2:00 pm, Shade+3-irradiance = 44 %). The experiment was performed in an irrigated field. We measured growth, biomass allocation, leaf traits, daily courses of leaf gas exchange and water potential. Oak dry-weight increased while height to dry-weight ratio and specific leaf area decreased with increasing daily exposure to direct beam radiation. Leaf chlorophyll content was less affected. Higher net carbon assimilation rates (A), stomatal conductance (gs) and A/gs were associated with higher instantaneous photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) throughout the entire experimental PPFD range. However, during gap-hours, while exposed to saturating radiation levels of similar level (ca. 1,800 µmol photon m−2 s−1), A in the Shade+1 oaks was about half that of the Shade+3 oaks and nearly one-third that of the Unshaded oaks. Patterns of gs, intercellular CO2 (Ci) and quantum efficiency of photosystem II pointed towards the possibility of a metabolic limitation. In conclusion, oaks benefited significantly from small scale overstory gaps though their capacity to utilize transient saturating radiation levels decreased with decreasing gap duration.


Photosynthesis Stomatal conductance Plant acclimation Forest management Mediterranean 



Special thanks to: Jaime Kigel, Rinat Ovadia, Hedva and Max Cooper for their valuable assistance in this work. We thank: Asaf Tzur, Nitai Zeharia, Nurit Hibsher, Tom Fogel and Eitan Bney-Moshe for their help in the field measurements. The study was funded by The Israeli Forest Service (KKL).


  1. Cooper A, Shapira O, Zaidan S, Moshe Y, Zangy E, Osem Y (2014) Oak restoration in water limited pine plantations: interactive effects of overstory light interception and water availability on understory oak performance. Eur J For Res. doi: 10.1007/s10342-014-0794-6 Google Scholar
  2. Cornic G (2000) Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture: not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends Plant Sci 5:187–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dey DC, Gardiner ES, Schweitzer CJ, Kabrick JM, Jacobs DF (2012) Underplanting to sustain future stocking of oak (Quercus) in temperate deciduous forests. New For 43:955–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dufour-Dror JM, Ertas A (2004) Bioclimatic perspectives in the distribution of Quercus ithaburensis Decne. subspecies in Turkey and in the Levant. J Biogeogr 31:461–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Flexas J, Medrano H (2002) Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited. Ann Bot 89:183–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaulton R, Malthus TJ (2010) LiDAR mapping of canopy gaps in continuous cover forests: a comparison of canopy height model and point cloud based techniques. Int J Remote Sens 31:1193–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Givnish TJ (1988) Adaptation to sun and shade: a whole-plant perspective. Aust J Plant Physiol 15:63–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grassi G, Minotta G, Tonon G, Bagnaresi U (2004) Dynamics of Norway spruce and silver fir natural regeneration in a mixed stand under uneven-aged management. Can J For Res 34:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grünzweig JM, Carmel Y, Sever N, McCreary DM, Flather CH (2008) Growth, resource storage, and adaptation to drought in California and eastern Mediterranean oak seedlings. Can J For Res 38:331–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gulías J, Seddaiu G, Cifre J, Salis M, Ledda L (2012) Leaf and plant water use efficiency in cocksfoot and tall fescue accessions under differing soil water availability. Crop Sci 52:2321–2331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo X, Guo W, Luo Y, Tan X, Du N, Wang R (2013) Morphological and biomass characteristic acclimation of trident maple (Acer buergerianum Miq.) in response to light and water stress. Acta Physiol Plant 35:1149–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Humbert L, Gagnon D, Kneeshaw D, Messier C (2007) A shade tolerance index for common understory species of northeastern North America. Ecol Ind 7:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Knight CA, Ackerly DD (2003) Evolution and plasticity of photosynthetic thermal tolerance, specific leaf area and leaf size: congeneric species from desert and coastal environments. New Phytol 160:337–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leakey ADB, Press MC, Scholes JD (2003) Patterns of dynamic irradiance affect the photosynthetic capacity and growth of dipterocarp tree seedlings. Oecologia 135:184–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lhotka JM (2013) Effect of gap size on mid-rotation stand structure and species composition in a naturally regenerated mixed broadleaf forest. New Forest 44:311–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lieffers VJ, Messier C, Stadt KJ, Gendron F, Comeau PG (1999) Predicting and managing light in the understory of boreal forests. Can J For Res 29:796–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Loriaux SD, Burns RA, Welles JM, McDermitt DK, Genty B (2006) Determination of maximal chlorophyll fluorescence using a multiphase single flash of sub-saturating intensity. American Society of Plant Biologists Annual Meeting, Boston MA, poster P13011. August 2006
  18. Maestre FT, Cortina J (2004) Are Pinus halepensis plantations useful as a restoration tool in semiarid Mediterranean areas? For Ecol Manage 198:303–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maestre FT, Cortina J, Bautista S, Bellot J (2003) Does pinus halepensis facilitate the establishment of shrubs under semiarid climate? For Ecol Manage 176:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mallik AU, Wang JR, Siegwart-Collier LS, Roberts BA (2012) Morphological and ecophysiological responses of sheep laurel (Kalmia angustifolia L.) to shade. Forestry 85:513–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Markwell J, Osterman JC, Mitchell JL (1995) Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter. Photosynth Res 46:467–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Monnier Y, Bousquet-Mélou A, Vila B, Prévosto B, Fernandez C (2013) How nutrient availability influences acclimation to shade of two (pioneer and late-successional) Mediterranean tree species? Eur J For Res 132:325–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morrissey RC, Jacobs DF, Davis AS, Rathfon RA (2010) Survival and competitiveness of Quercus rubra regeneration associated with planting stocktype and harvest opening intensity. New For 40:273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Munné-Bosch S, Alegre L (2000) The xanthophyll cycle is induced by light irrespective of water status in field-grown lavender (Lavandula stoechas) plants. Physiol Plant 108:147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Naor A (2000) Midday stem water potential as a plant water stress indicator for irrigation scheduling in fruit trees. Acta Hortic 537:447–454Google Scholar
  26. Niinemets Ü, Valladares F (2006) Tolerance to shade, drought and waterlogging of temperate, Northern hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecol Monogr 76:521–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Osem Y, Ginsberg P, Tauber I, Atzmon N, Perevolotsky A (2008) Sustainable management of Mediterranean planted coniferous forests: an Israeli definition. J For 106:38–46Google Scholar
  28. Osem Y, Zangy E, Bney-Moshe E, Moshe Y, Karni N, Nisan Y (2009) The potential of transforming simple structured pine plantations into mixed Mediterranean forests through natural regeneration along a rainfall gradient. For Ecol Manage 259:14–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prevosto B, Monnier Y, Ripert C, Fernandez C (2011) Can we use shelterwoods in Mediterranean pine forests to promote oak seedling development? For Ecol Manage 262:1426–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Puértolas J, Pardos M, Jiménez MD, Aranda I, Pardos JA (2008) Interactive responses of Quercus suber L. seedlings to light and mild water stress: effects on morphology and gas exchange traits. Ann For Sci 65:611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramírez-Valiente JA, Sánchez-Gómez D, Aranda I, Valladares F (2010) Phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation in leaf ecophysiological traits of 13 contrasting cork oak populations under different water availabilities. Tree Physiol 30:618–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ravikovitch S (1992) The soils of Israel: formation, nature and properties. Hakibbuts Hamehuchad Publication House, IsraelGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodríguez-Calcerrada J, Pardos JA, Gil L, Aranda I (2007) Acclimation to light in seedlings of Quercus petraea (Mattuschka) Liebl. and Quercus pyrenaica Willd. planted along a forest-edge gradient. Trees 21:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruiz-Benito P, Gómez-Aparicio L, Zavala MA (2012) Large-scale assessment of regeneration and diversity in Mediterranean planted pine forests along ecological gradients. Divers Distrib 18:1092–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sabate S, Gracia CA, Sanchez A (2002) Likely effects of climate change on growth of Quercus ilex, Pinus halepensis, Pinus pinaster, Pinus sylvestris and Fagus sylvatica forests in the Mediterranean region. For Ecol Manage 162:23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sack L (2004) Responses of temperate woody seedlings to shade and drought: do trade-offs limit potential niche differentiation? Oikos 107:110–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sheffer E (2012) A review of the development of Mediterranean pine-oak ecosystems after land abandonment and afforestation: are they novel ecosystems? Ann For Sci 69:429–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith T, Huston M (1989) A theory of the spatial and temporal dynamics of plant communities. Vegetatio 83:49–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spies TA, Franklin JF, Klopsch M (1990) Canopy gaps in douglas-fir forests of the cascade mountains. Can J Forest Res 20:649–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Teskey RO, Shrestha RB (1985) Relationship between carbon dioxide, photosynthetic efficiency and shade tolerance. Physiol Plant 63:126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Volkova L, Bennett LT, Tausz M (2009) Effects of sudden exposure to high light levels on two tree fern species Dicksonia antarctica (Dicksoniaceae) and Cyathea australis (Cyatheaceae) acclimated to different light intensities. Aust J Bot 57:562–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wayne PM, Bazzaz FA (1993) Birch seedling responses to daily time courses of light in experimental forest gaps and shade-houses. Ecology 74:1500–1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. White PS, MacKenzie MD, Busing RT (1985) Natural disturbance and gap phase dynamics in southern Appalachian spruce-fir forests. Can J Forest Res 15:233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zohary M (1961) On the oak species of Middle East. Bull Res Counc Isr Sect D Bot 4:161–186Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnon Cooper
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yossi Moshe
    • 1
  • Ela Zangi
    • 1
  • Yagil Osem
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Natural ResourcesAgricultural Research Organization, Volcani CenterBet DaganIsrael
  2. 2.The Faculty of Agriculture, Food and EnvironmentHebrew University of JerusalemRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations