Advertisement

New Forests

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 123–141 | Cite as

Stand Density Control Diagrams for Scots pine and Austrian black pine plantations in Bulgaria

  • Tatiana Vassileva Stankova
  • Masato Shibuya
Article

Abstract

Stand Density Control Diagram (SDCD) is a stand-level mathematical model, which describes the relationships between yield, density and mortality throughout all stages of stand development. The SDCD is primarily used to derive density control schedules by management objectives. The main objectives of the present study are to define a modified model of SDCD for application to Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Austrian black pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) plantations in Bulgaria, to examine the fitness of the model with representative experimental data sets from plantations of both species and to present a way of direct application of the SDCDs for practical purposes. The constructed SDCDs characterize the spatial-temporal dynamics of the pine plantations in a broad range of densities, forest sites and growth stages from 4 to 26 (28) m of dominant height class. The full density lines were fixed with self-thinning exponents α = 1.69 and α = 1.75 for Scots pine and Austrian black pine, respectively, and the trajectories of natural thinning for 23 initial densities (444-40000/ha) were determined. A direct way for application of the SDCDs to the plantation management was designed to estimate the optimal initial densities for the maximum attainable final yield and large-size wood production by self-thinning stands.

Keywords

Natural thinning trajectory Plantation density Stand management Self-thinning Yield–density relationship 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the financing authorities of the present study: the Bulgarian–Swiss Forestry Program and the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science and to the work teams involved in performance of the fieldwork. Gratitude is also owed to the Forest Research Institute of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences for the presented data from the research reports.

References

  1. Aikman DP, Watkinson AR (1980) A model for growth and self-thinning in even-aged monocultures of plants. Ann Bot 45:419–427Google Scholar
  2. Alexandrov A, Tsakov H, Genov K, Stojkov H, Tsankov G, Djorgov I, Tiholov B, Asparuhova E, Andonova E, Dakov A, Hristova H (2002) Project “Management of the forest and changes in the biodiversity of burnt forest areas”. Bulgarian–Swiss Forestry Program, “Sylvica” foundationGoogle Scholar
  3. Ando T (1962) Growth analysis on the natural stands of Japanese red pine (Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc.). II. Analysis of stand density and growth. Bull Gov Forest Exp Stn, Tokyo 147:45–77 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  4. Atanasov B (1963) Study on the age of canopy closing of the Austrian black pine plantations in relation to the choice of optimal density for forestation. Proc Forest Res Instit XII:147–170 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  5. Atanasov B (1964) Study on the age of canopy closing of the Scots pine plantations in relation to the choice of initial density. For Sci (Sofia, Bulgaria) 6:19–29 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  6. Bachvarov D (1978) An offer for practical implementation of scientific achievement: “The most appropriate initial density for Austrian black pine plantations on good sites”. Forest Research Institute of BAS, Sofia (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  7. Beck D (1971) Height-growth patterns and site index of white pine in the southern Appalachians. For Sci 17:252–260Google Scholar
  8. Begin E, Begin J, Belanger L, Rivest LP, Tremblay S (2001) Balsam fir self-thinning relationship and its constancy among different ecological regions. Can J For Res 31:950–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Botev N (1989) Growth of European beech stands of different initial densities. Forestry (Sofia, Bulgaria) 7:7–9 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  10. Botev N (1990) The density of the European beech plantations. Forestry (Sofia, Bulgaria) 7:13–14 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  11. Clutter JL, Fortson JC, Pienaar LV, Brister GH, Bailey RL (1983) Timber management: a quantitative approach. John Wiley & Sons, NY, pp 65–66Google Scholar
  12. Crow EL, Davis FA, Maxfield MW (1960) Statistical manual with examples taken from ordnance development. Dover publications Inc., NY, 165 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Draper NR, Smith H (1981) Applied regression analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., NY, pp 86–93Google Scholar
  14. Drew TJ, Flewelling JW (1977) Some recent Japanese theories of yield–density relationships and their application to Monterey pine plantations. For Sci 23:517–534Google Scholar
  15. Drew TJ, Flewelling JW (1979) Stand density management: an alternative approach and its application to Douglas-fir plantations. For Sci 25:518–532Google Scholar
  16. Gadow KV, Hui G (1999) Modelling forest development. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 26–27Google Scholar
  17. Gilmore DW, David AJ (2002) Current trends in management practices for European larch in North America. For Chron 78:822–829Google Scholar
  18. Hagihara A (1998) Mathematical and biological considerations on yield and competition-density effects in self-thinning plant populations. Bull Fac Sci Univ Ryukyus 66:71–79Google Scholar
  19. Hagihara A (1999) Theoretical considerations on the C-D effect in self-thinning plant populations. Res Popul Ecol 41:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hagihara A (2000) Time-trajectory of mean plant mass and density. Bull Fac Sci Univ Ryukyus 70:99–112Google Scholar
  21. Hozumi K (1983) Ecological and mathematical considerations on self-thinning in even-aged pure stands. III. Effect of the linear growth factor on self-thinning and its model. Bot Mag Tokyo 96:171–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kikuzawa K (1999) Theoretical relationships between mean plant size, size distribution and self-thinning under one-sided competition. Ann Bot 83:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kostadinov K (1980) Density and productivity of plantations of Austrian black pine. Forestry (Sofia, Bulgaria) 7:5–7 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  24. Kostadinov K (1985) Optimal initial density of the forest plantations. For Forest Indust (Sofia, Bulgaria) 9:29–30 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  25. Kostov K, Bachvarov D, Palashev I, Lyapova J (1978) Method to derive and maintain optimal density for establishment of man made forest stands. Forest Research Institute of BAS, Sofia. Research report No 10255005 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  26. Kostov K (1960) Initial density in the nests for sowing plantations of red oak. Forestry (Sofia, Bulgaria) 5:16–21 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  27. Kostov K (1963) On some peculiarities in the growth of the common oak in relation to the stand composition and density. Proc Forest Res Instit XIII:5–27 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  28. Krastanov K, Belyakov P, Shikov K (1979) Study on the technical maturity of Scots pine plantations. For Sci (Sofia, Bulgaria) 5:3–21 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  29. Krastanov K, Belyakov P, Shikov K (1983) Volume and assortment tables for Scots pine plantations. In: Nedyalkov S, Rashkov R, Tashkov R (eds) Reference book in dedrobiometry. Zemizdat, Sofia, pp 57–69 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  30. Lyapova Y (1984) Growth of the Scotch pine at different initial densities. Forestry (Sofia, Bulgaria) 2:31–33 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  31. MacFarlane DW, Green EJ, Burkhart HE (2000) Population density influences assessment and application of site index. Can J For Res 30:1472–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marinov I (1999) Investigation on erosion in forest ecosystems. Research report for the period 1996–1999. Forest Research Institute of BAS, Sofia (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  33. Marinov I (2002) Stationary studies of hydrological and erosion processes in forest ecosystems. Research report for the period 2000–2002. Forest Research Institute of BAS, Sofia (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  34. Marinov I, Mandev A, Grozeva M, Timousheva S, Markov I, Genov K (1997) Investigation on the hydrological effectiveness against erosion of the coniferous plantations in western Bulgaria. Report on the project with National forestry board. Forest Research Institute of BAS, Sofia (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  35. Milev M, Iliev N (2003) Influence of the seed origin and the planting scheme in Scots pine plantations. I. Status, growth and productivity. In: Proceedings of the international scientific conference “50 years Forest University-Sofia” 1–2 April 2003, Sofia, vol 1, pp 51–54 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  36. Nedyalkov S, Krastanov K, Tsakov H (1983) Volume and assortment tables for Austrian black pine plantations. In: Nedyalkov S, Rashkov R, Tashkov R (eds) Reference book in dedrobiometry. Zemizdat, Sofia, pp 84–97 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  37. Newton PF (1997) Stand density management diagrams: review of their development and utility in stand-level management planning. For Ecol Manage 98:251–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Newton PF, Weetman GF (1994) Stand density management diagram for managed black spruce stands. For Chron 70:65–74Google Scholar
  39. Nishizono T, Inoue A, Iehara T (2002) Relationship between self-thinning exponent and relative spacing index for Cryptomeria japonica and Chamaecyparis obtusa stands. J For Plan 8:41–47Google Scholar
  40. Payandeh B (1974) Formulated site index curves for major timber species in Ontario. For Sci 20:143–144Google Scholar
  41. Penner M, Robinson C, Burgess D (2001) Pinus resinosa product potential following initial spacing and subsequent thinning. For Chron 77:129–139Google Scholar
  42. Puettmann KJ, Hibbs DE, Hann DW (1992). The dynamics of mixed stands of Alnus rubra and Pseudotsuga menziesii: extension of size-density analysis to species mixture. J Ecol 80:449–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roubtsov VI (1969) Pine plantations in the wooded steppe. Moskva, Lesnaya promishlenost, (in Russian)Google Scholar
  44. Shibuya M (1995) A simple and practical model for mean size-density trajectories of tree stands. J Jpn For Soc 77:247–253Google Scholar
  45. Shibuya M, Haga N, Sasaki T, Kikuchi S, Haruki M, Noda M, Takahashi K, Matsuda K (2004) Stand and self-thinning dynamics in natural Abies stands in northern Hokkaido, Japan. Ecol Res 19:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shinozaki K, Kira T (1956) Intraspecific competition among higher plants. VII. Logistic theory of the C-D effect. J Inst Polytech, Osaka City Univ, Series D (Biology) 7:35–72Google Scholar
  47. Shinozaki K, Kira T (1961) The C-D rule, its theory and practical uses. Intraspecific competition among higher plants X. J Biol, Osaka City Univ 12:69–82Google Scholar
  48. Stankova T, Shibuya M, Hagihara A (2002) New method for density control of forest plantations. For Sci (Sofia, Bulgaria) 2:27–38Google Scholar
  49. Stankova T, Shibuya M (2003) Adaptation of Hagihara’s competition-density theory for practical application to natural birch stands. For Ecol Manage 186:7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stankova T, Stankov H, Shibuya M (2006) Mean-dominant height relationships for Scotch pine and Austrian black pine plantations in Bulgaria. Ecol Eng Environ Protect 2:59–66Google Scholar
  51. Sturtevant BR, Bissonette JA, Long JN (1998) Stand density management diagram for mixed balsam fir: black spruce stands. North J Appl For 15:17–22Google Scholar
  52. Tadaki Y (1963) The pre-estimating of stem yield based on the competition-density effect. Bull Gov Forest Exp Stn, Tokyo 154:1–19 (in Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  53. Tsakov H (1984) Technical maturity of black pine plantations. For Sci (Sofia, Bulgaria) 6:24–38 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  54. Westoby M (1984) The self-thinning rule. Adv Ecol Res 14:167–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xue L, Ogawa K, Hagihara A, Liang S, Bai J (1999) Self-thinning exponents based on the allometric model in Chinese pine (Pinus tabulaeformis Carr.) and Prince Rupprecht’s larch (Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr.) stands. For Ecol Manage 117:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yoda K, Kira T, Ogawa H, Hozumi K (1963) Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions. Intraspecific competition among higher plants XI. J Biol Osaka City Univ 14:107–129Google Scholar
  57. Zahariev B, Sirakov H, Naumov Z, Rosnev B, Jorova K, Keremidchiev M, Gounev G (1983) Intensively managed forest plantations. Zemizdat, Sofia, pp 159–167 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
  58. Zhelev I (1976) On the initial density of the pine plantations. For Sci (Sofia, Bulgaria) 4:13–23 (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest Genetics, Physiology and PlantationsForest Research Institute of Bulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria
  2. 2.Faculty of AgricultureHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations