New Forests

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 63–73 | Cite as

Effect of the arbuscular mycorrhizae Glomus fasciculatum and G. macrocarpum on the growth and nutrient content of Cassia siamea in a semi-arid Indian wasteland soil

  • Bhoopander Giri
  • Rupam Kapoor
  • K.G. Mukerji


The effect of two arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, Glomus fasciculatum and G. macrocarpum on shoot and root dry weights and nutrient content of Cassia siamea in a semi-arid wasteland soil was evaluated. Under nursery conditions, mycorrhizal inoculation improved growth of seedlings. Root and shoot dry weights were higher in mycorrhizal than non-mycorrhizal plants. The concentration of P, K, Cu, Zn and Na was significantly higher in AM inoculated seedlings than in non-inoculated seedlings. Mycorrhization led to decrease in alkalinity of the rhizosphere soil from pH 8.5 to 7.4. Under nursery conditions, the degree of mycorrhizal dependency increased with age of C. siamea seedling. On transplantation to the field, the survival rate of mycorrhizal seedlings (75%–90%) was higher than that of non-mycorrhizal seedlings (40%). Besides better survival rate, AM inoculation improved the growth performance of seedlings in terms of height and stem diameter. Among the two AM fungi used, the efficiency of Glomus macrocarpum was higher than that of G. fasciculatum under both nursery and field conditions.

AM fungi Multipurpose tree Mycorrhizal dependency Plant survival rate 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Al-Karaki G.N. and Al-Raddad A. 1997. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and drought stress on growth and nutrient uptake of two wheat genotypes differing in drought resistance. Mycorrhiza 7: 83–88.Google Scholar
  2. Allen M.F. 1989a. Mycorrhizae and rehabilitation of disturbed arid soils: process and practices. Arid Soil Res. 3: 229–241.Google Scholar
  3. Allen S.E. 1989b. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, London.Google Scholar
  4. Allen M.F. 1982. Influence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae on water movement through Bouteloua gracilis (HBK) Lag. Ex. Steud. New Phytol. 91: 191–196.Google Scholar
  5. Allen M.F. and Boosalis M.G. 1983. Effect of two species of VA mycorrhizal fungi on drought tolerance of winter wheat. New Phytol. 93: 67–76.Google Scholar
  6. Allen E.B. and Cuningham G.L. 1983. Effects of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae on Distichlis spicata under three salinity levels. New Phytol. 93: 227–236.Google Scholar
  7. Auge R.M., Stodola A.J.W., Ebel R.C. and Duan X. 1995. Leaf elongation and water relations of mycorrhizal sorgum in response to partial soil drying: two Glomus species at varying phosphorus fertilization. J. Exp. Bot. 46: 297–307.Google Scholar
  8. Azcon-Aguilar C., Azcon R. and Barea J.M. 1979. Endomycorrhizal fungi and rhizobium as biological fertilizers for Medicago sativa in normal cultivation. Nature 279: 325–327.Google Scholar
  9. Bansal M. and Mukerji K.G. 1994. Positive correlation between VAM induced changes in root exudation and mycorrhizosphere mycoflora. Mycorrhiza 5: 39–44.Google Scholar
  10. Diaz G., Azcon-Aguilar C. and Honrubia M. 1996. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on heavy metals (Zn and Pb) uptake and growth of Lygeum spartum and Anthyllis cytisoides. Plant Soil 180: 241–249.Google Scholar
  11. Dixon R.K., Garg V.K. and Rao M.V. 1993. Inoculation of Leucaena and Prosopis seedlings with Glomus and Rhizobium species in saline soil: rhizosphere relations and seedlings growth. Arid Soil Res. Rehabil. 7: 133–144.Google Scholar
  12. Dixon R.K., Mukerji K.G., Chamola B.P. and Kaushik A. 1997. Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in relationship to forestation in arid lands. Ann. For. 5: 1–9.Google Scholar
  13. Fagbola O., Osonubi O., Mulongoy K. and Odunfa S.A. 2001. Effects of drought stress and arbuscular mycorrhiza on the growth of Gliricidia sepium (Jacq). Wolp, and Leucaena leucocephala (Lom.) de Wit. in simulated eroded soil conditions. Mycorrhiza 11: 215–223.Google Scholar
  14. Gerdemann L.W. and Nicolson T.H. 1963. Spores of mycorrhizal Endogone species extracted from soil by wet sieving and decanting. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 46: 235–244.Google Scholar
  15. Giri B., Rawat R., Kaur M. and Mukerji K.G. 1998. VA-mycorrhizal dependency of Sesbania grandiflora during nursery stage in relation to afforestation. Acta Bot. Indica 26: 195–200.Google Scholar
  16. Giri B., Kaur M. and Mukerji K.G. 1999. Growth responses and dependency of Sesbania aegyptiaca on vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza in salt stressed soil. Ann. Agric. Res. 20: 109–112.Google Scholar
  17. Giri B., Kapoor R. and Mukerji K.G. 2000. Sesbania aegyptiaca Pers seedlings response to VA mycorrhization in two types of soil. Phytomorphology 50: 327–332.Google Scholar
  18. Giri B., Kapoor R. and Mukerji K.G. 2003. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and salinity on growth, biomass, and mineral nutrition of Acacia auriculiformis. Biol. Fertil. Soils 38: 170–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graham J.H., Duncan L.W. and Eissenatat D.M. 1997. Carbohydrates allocation patterns in citrus genotypes as affected by phosphorus nutrition, mycorrhizal colonization and mycorrhizal dependency. New Phytol. 135: 335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Habte M. and Soedarjo M. 1996. Response of Acacia mangium to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation, soil pH and soil P concentration in an oxisol. Can. J. Bot. 74: 155–161.Google Scholar
  21. Hayman D.S. and Mosse B. 1971. Plant growth responses to vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza. I. Growth of Endogone-inoculated plants in phosphate deficient soils. New Phytol. 70: 19–22.Google Scholar
  22. Jasper D.A. 1994. Management of mycorrhiza in revegetation. In: Robson A.D., Abbott L.K. and Malajczuk N. (eds) Management of Mycorrhizas in Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry. Kluwer Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 211–219.Google Scholar
  23. Jasper D.A., Abbott L.K. and Robson A.D. 1989. Hyphae of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus maintain infectivity in dry soil, except when the soil is disturbed. New Phytol. 112: 93–99.Google Scholar
  24. Koske K.E. and Gemma J.N. 1989. A modified procedure for staining roots to detect VA mycorrhizas. Mycol. Res. 92: 486–505.Google Scholar
  25. Kovitvadhi K. and Yantasath K. 1982. Research on Leauceana and other nitrogen fixing trees at the Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research (TISTR). In: Leucaena research in the Asian-Pacific region, proceedings of a workshop held in Singapore, November 23–26 1982, pp. 133–137.Google Scholar
  26. Krishna K.R. and Bagyaraj D.J. 1985. Phosphatases in rhizospheres of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal groundnut. J Soil Biol. Ecol. 5: 81–85.Google Scholar
  27. Marschner H. and Dell B. 1994. Nutrient uptake in mycorrizal symbiosis. Plant Soil 159: 89–102.Google Scholar
  28. Mukerji K.G., Chamola B.P., Kaushik A., Sarwar N. and Dixon R.K. 1996. Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza: potential biofertilizer for nursery raised multipurpose tree species in tropical soils. Ann. For. 4: 12–20.Google Scholar
  29. Pacovsky R.S. 1986. Micronutrient uptake and distribution in mycorrhizal or phosphorus-fertilized soybeans. Plant Soil 95: 379–388.Google Scholar
  30. Plenchette C., Fortin J.A. and Furlan V. 1983. Growth responses of seasonal plant species to mycorrhizae in a soil of moderate p-fertility. I Mycorrhizal dependency under field conditions. Plant Soil 70: 199–209.Google Scholar
  31. Requena N., Jimenez I., Toro M. and Barea J.M. 1997. Interaction between plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium sp. in the rhizosphere of Anthyllis cytisoides, a model legume for revegetation in Mediterranean semi-arid ecosystem. New Phytol. 136: 667–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rhodes L.H. and Gerdemann J.W. 1978. Translocation of calcium and phosphate by external hyphae of VA mycorrhiza. Soil Sci. 126: 125–126.Google Scholar
  33. Sharma M.P., Gour A., Bhatia N.P. and Adholeya A. 1996. Growth responses and dependence of Acacia nilotica var. cupriciformis on the indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal consortium of a marginal wasteland soil. Mycorrhiza 6: 169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sharma M.P., Bhatia N.P. and Adholeya A. 2001. Mycorrhizal dependency and growth responses of Acacia nilotica and Albizzia lebbeck to inoculation by indigenous AM fungi as influenced by available soil P levels in a semi-arid alfisol wasteland. New Forest 21: 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Srivastava D., Kapoor R., Srivastava S.K. and Mukerji K.G. 1996. Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza-an overview. In: Mukerji K.G. (ed) Concepts in Mycorrhizal Research. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  36. Sylvia D.M. and Williams S.E. 1992. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae and environmental stress. In: Mycorrhizae in Sustainable Agriculture. ASA Special Publication No. 54, Madison, WI, pp. 101–124.Google Scholar
  37. Tinker P.B. 1975. Soil chemistry of phosphorus and mycorrhizal effects on plant growth. In: Sanders F.E., Mosse B. and Tinker P.B. (eds) Endomycorrizas Academic Press, London, pp. 353–371.Google Scholar
  38. Wealth of India 1985. A Dictionary of Indian Raw Materials and Industrial Products. Raw Materials, Vol. 1. A Publication and Information Directorate CSIR, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations