Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the Cognitive Capacities of Immature and Young Mature Male Hamadryas Baboons

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Studies of the dynamics of cognitive processes in experiments on primates can be useful for establishing the biological roots of mental processes occurring in adolescents. Experiments were performed using 12 male hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas) aged from 45 to 67 months. Levels of cognitive capacities were determined in males using the following tests: tests for the ability to establish the position of a reward in space, which can be defined as “spatial” tests; tests for learning ability; a test for exploratory activity. Results obtained from comparison of cognitive capacities in immature and young mature male hamadryas baboons showed that some of the cognitive capacities were age-dependent and that there was no synchronicity in the development of cognitive capacities. In particular, mature males were significantly more successful in solving “spatial” tests than males under the age of puberty. There were no differences in solutions to tests for exploratory activity and the ability to learn skills between immature and young mature males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. E. Anikaev, V. G. Chalyan, and N. V. Meishvili, “A comparative study of the cognitive abilities of hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas) and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) in the solution of manipulation tasks,” Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Univ. Ser. XXIII Antropol., 4, 93–102 (2013).

  2. A. E. Anikaev, V. G. Chalyan, and N. V. Meishvili, “A comparative study of the ability to solve tasks of the Piaget ‘A not B error’ type in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas),” in: From the Beginnings to the Present. 130 Years of the Organization of the Psychological Society at Moscow University: Proc. Jubilee Conf. (2015), Vol. 5, pp. 401–403.

  3. A. E. Anikaev, V. G. Chalyan, and N. V. Meishvili, “A comparative study of the ability to make conscious choices in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas),” Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Univ. Ser. XXIII Antropol., 4, 74–87 (2014).

  4. Z. A. Zorina and A. A. Smirnova, “History and methods in the experimental study of thought in animals,” in: Contemporary Experimental Psychology, V. A. Barabanshchikov (ed.), Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences Press, Moscow (2000).

  5. W. Köhler, The Mentality of Apes [Russian translation], Communist Academy Press, Moscow (1930).

  6. B. A. Lapin, L. N. Norkina, G. M. Cherkovich, et al., Monkeys in Medical and Biological Experiments, USSR Academy of Medical Sciences, Sukhumi (1963).

  7. A. E. Anikaev, V. G. Chalyan, and N. V. Meishvili, “Study of hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas) ability to solve object manipulation tasks,” Bull. Exp. Biol. Med., 159, No. 1, 85–86 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Banerjee, C. F. Chabris, V. E. Johnson, et al., “General intelligence in another primate: individual differences across cognitive task performance in a New World monkey (Saguinus oedipus),” PLoS One, 4, No. 6, e5883 (2009).

  9. S.-J. Blakemore, S. Burnett, and R. E. Dahl, “The role of puberty in the developing adolescent brain,” Hum. Brain Mapp., 31, No. 6, 926–933 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Blaser and C. Heyser, “Spontaneous object recognition: a promising approach to the comparative study of memory,” Front. Behav. Neurosci., 9, 183 (2015).

  11. J. J. Buccafusco, “Estimation of working memory in macaques for studying drugs for the treatment of cognitive disorders,” J. Alzheimers Dis., 15, No. 4, 709–720 (2008).

  12. V. G. Chalyan and N. V. Meishvili, “Hierarchical relationships in free-ranging hamadryas baboon males,” Baltic J. Lab. Anim. Sci., 11, 74–80 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. J. Chelonis, M. P. Gillam, and M. G. Paule, “The effects of prenatal cocaine exposure on reversal learning using a simple visual discrimination task in rhesus monkeys,” Neurotoxicol. Teratol., 25, No. 4, 437–446 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. P. F. Ferrari, E. Koehler, L. Fogassi, and V. Gallese, “The ability to follow eye gaze and its emergence during development in macaque monkeys,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, No. 25, 13997–14002 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. M. S. Golub, S. L. Germann, and C. L. Hogrefe, “Endocrine disruption and cognitive function in adolescent female rhesus monkeys,” Neurotoxicol. Teratol., 26, No. 6, 799–809 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Hayashi and T. Matsuzawa, “Cognitive development in object manipulation by infant chimpanzees,” Ann. Cogn., 6, 225–233 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Konrad, C. Firk, and P. J. Uhlaas, “Brain development during adolescence,” Dtsch. Arztebl. Int., 110, No. 25, 425–431 (2013).

  18. H. Kummer, Social Organization of Hamadryas Baboons. A Field Study, Chicago University Press, Chicago (1968).

  19. B. Luna, K. E. Garver, T. A. Urban, et al., “Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood,” Child Dev., 75, No. 5, 1357–1372 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. L. Malkova, E. Heuer, and R. C. Saunders, “Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of rhesus monkey brain development,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 24, No. 11, 3204–3212 (2006).

  21. L. Steinberg, “Cognitive and affective development in adolescence,” Trends Cogn. Sci., 9, No. 2, 69–74 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Tomasello, “Primate cognition: Introduction to the issue,” Cognitive Sci., 24, No. 3, 351–361 (2000).

  23. M. H. Weed, R. Bryant, and S. Perry, “Cognitive development in macaques: attentional set-shifting in juvenile and adult rhesus monkeys,” Neuroscience, 157, No. 1, 22–28 (2008).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. E. Anikaev.

Additional information

Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 103, No. 6, pp. 635–644, June, 2017.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anikaev, A.E., Chalyan, V.G. & Meishvili, N.V. Comparison of the Cognitive Capacities of Immature and Young Mature Male Hamadryas Baboons. Neurosci Behav Physi 49, 299–305 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-019-00732-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-019-00732-0

Keywords

Navigation