Advertisement

Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 149–152 | Cite as

Structural Organization and Morphometric Characteristic of the Vertebral Canals in the Cervical Segment of the Spine

  • K. A. Zhandarov
  • A. V. Nikolaev
  • V. I. Tel’pukhov
  • M. V. Nelipa
Article
  • 9 Downloads

The aim of the present work was to study the topographic anatomical characteristics of the intervertebral canal. Studies were performed using 37 anatomical preparations including 185 intervertebral canals in section complexes of the of the cervical segment of the spines of people dying at age 58–78 years. Histological investigations were performed using 32 preparations of ligamentous structures. Five pairs of true intervertebral canals were identified in segments C2–C7. The mean parameters of intervertebral canals were: length 1.46–2.0 mm; outer opening 0.8–1.4 mm; inner opening 0.4–0.8 mm. Histological studies confirmed data showing that the structures observed were ligaments, with diameters ranging from 0.1 to 0.3 mm and length from 0.4 to 0.6 mm. Intervertebral canals could be divided into three groups: those with clearly defined true ligaments (46%), ligaments with additional false ligaments (fibrotic bands) compressing the spinal nerve (43%), and canals without ligaments but with bony and fibrotic protuberances compressing the spinal nerve (11%).

Keywords

spine cervical segment intervertebral canals lateral canal medial opening of intervertebral canal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. I. Anisimov, I. A. Norkin, V. N. Nikolenko, et al., “Topographical anatomical characteristics of the transverse openings of the cervical vertebrae in relation to age and gender,” Saratov. Nauch.-Med. Zh., 8, No. 2, 177–181 (2012).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. A. Belen’kii and E. L. Nasonov, “Dorsalgia in inflammatory diseases of the spine,” Russ. Med. Zh., 11, No. 7, 379–381 (2003).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. M. Vein, Pain Syndromes in Neurological Practice, MEDpress, Moscow (1999).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. I. Labzin, “Characteristics of structural components of the canal of the transverse processes of the cervical segment of the human spine,” Dalnevost. Med. Zh., No. 4, 14–16 (2006).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. S. Manvelov and A. V. Kadykov, “Tunnel syndromes,” Nevrol./Revmatol., No. 2, 64–67 (2014).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. L. Kolesnikov (ed.), International Anatomical Terminology, Meditsina, Moscow (2003).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kh. A. Musalatov and A. G. Aganesov, Surgical Rehabilitation of Radicular Syndrome in Osteochondrosis of the Lumbar Segment of the Spine. Microsurgical and Puncture Discectomy. Meditsina, Moscow (1988).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. V. Nikolaev, V. I. Tel’pukhov, Kh. A. Musalatov, et al., “Intraforaminal ligaments as an additional factor in the development of compression of the spinal roots,” Annaly Khirurgii, No. 6, 134–140 (1999).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. Ya. Protasov, “The spinal canal system,” in Patterns of Morphogenesis in the Support Organs of Spinal and Limb Structures at Different Stages of Ontogeny: Intercollegiate Thematic Collection, A. I. Borisevich (ed.), Yaroslavl State Univ., Yaroslavl (1983), pp. 30–36.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. T. Sampiev, Treatment of Combined Ligamentous Stenosis of Intervertebral Canals with Radicular Syndrome in the Lumbosacral Segment: Auth. Abstr. Master’s Thesis in Med. Sci., Moscow (1999).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Yu. Smirnov, D. R. Shtul’man, and G. Yu. Evzikov, “Lumbar stenosis (A review of the literature and analysis of our own observations),” Nevrol. Zh., 3, No. 4, 27–31 (1998).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. G. Giles, “Mechanisms of neurovascular compression within the spinal intervertebral canals,” J. Manipulat. Physiol. Ther., 23, 107–111 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Scapinelli, C. Stecco, A. Pozzuoli, et al., “The lumbar interspinous ligaments in humans: anatomical study and review of the literature,” Cells Tiss. Organs, 183, No. 1, 1–11 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. G. Teplick, Lumbar Spine CT and MRI, Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia (1992).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. A. Zhandarov
    • 1
  • A. V. Nikolaev
    • 1
  • V. I. Tel’pukhov
    • 1
  • M. V. Nelipa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Operative Surgery and Topographic AnatomySechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations