Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 296–303 | Cite as

Assessment of the Velocity of Traveling Waves in the High-Frequency Cochlea of the Dolphin

  • V. V. Popov
  • A. Ya. Supin

Short-latency auditory evoked potentials (SLAEP) produced in response to sound impulses with strictly specifi ed 0.5-oct frequency bands, from 11.2–16 to 90–128 kHz, were recorded in bottle-nose dolphins. Using stimuli of constant intensity, SLAEP amplitude depended on the spectral frequency of the stimulus: the higher the frequency, the greater the amplitude. Response shape showed little dependence on spectral band, though the response delay changed with frequency: the higher the frequency, the shorter the delay. The differences in delays between the responses to low-frequency (11.2–16 kHz) and high-frequency (90–128 kHz) stimuli was 0.3 msec. This difference in response delays could be attributed to the propagation time of the traveling wave in the cochlea; the results obtained here were used to calculate the velocity of the traveling wave. These assessments of velocity were from 38.2 oct/msec at the proximal (high-frequency) end of the basilar membrane to 2.8 oct/msec at the distal (low-frequency) end. Comparison of traveling wave velocities in humans and dolphins showed that traveling wave velocity was not linked to the location on the cochlea, but to the characteristic frequency.


hearing cochlea dolphin traveling wave 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    V. V. Popov and A. Ya. Supin, Hearing in Whales and Dolphins, KMK Press, Moscow (2013).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. W. Au, The Sonar of Dolphins, Springer Verlag, New York (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Békésy, “The variation of phase along the basilar membrane with sinusoidal vibration,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 19, 452–460 (1947).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Burkard and K. Hecox, “The effect of broadband noise on human brainstem auditory evoked response. II. frequency specifi city,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 74, 1214–1223 (1983).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Davis and S. K. Hirsh, “The audiometric utility of brainstem responses to low-frequency sounds,” Audiology, 15, 181–195 (1976).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Don and J. J. Eggermont, “Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in man using high-pass noise masking,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 63, 1084–1092 (1978).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. S. Donaldson and R. A. Ruth, “Derived band auditory brain-stem response estimates of traveling wave velocity in humans. I. Normalhearing subjects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 93, 940–951 (1993).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. J. Eggermont, “Electrocochleography,” in: Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1976), Vol. V/III.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. J. Eggermont, “Narrow-band AP latencies in normal and recruiting human ears,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 65, 463–470 (1979).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Elberling, “Action potentials along the cochlear partition recorded from the ear canal in man,” Scand. Audiol., 3, 3–19 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. J. Gould and O. A. Sobhy, “Using the derived auditory brain stem response to estimate traveling wave velocity,” Ear Hear., 13, 96–101 (1992).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. D. Greenwood, “Critical bandwidth and the frequency coordinates of the basilar membrane,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 33, 1344–1356 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. J. Parker and A. R. D. Thornton, “Cochlear travelling wave velocities calculated from the derived components of the cochlear nerve and brainstem evoked responses of the human auditory system,” Scand. Audiol., 7, 67–70 (1978).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Picton, J. Ouellette, G. Hamel, and A. Smoth, “Brainstem evoked potentials to tone pips in notched noise,” J. Otolaryngol., 8, 289–314 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. V. Popov and A. Ya. Supin, “Auditory brain stem responses in characterization of dolphin hearing,” J. Comp. Physiol. A, 166, 385–393 (1990).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. V. Popov, A. Ya. Supin, and V. O. Klishin, “ABR frequency tuning curves in dolphins,” J. Comp. Physiol. A, 173, 649–656 (1993).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    V. V. Popov, A. Ya. Supin, and V. O. Klishin, “Frequency tuning curves of the dolphin’s hearing: Envelope-following response study,” J. Comp. Physiol. A, 178, 571–578 (1995).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. V. Popov, A. Ya. Supin, and V. O. Klishin, “Frequency tuning of the dolphin’s hearing as revealed by auditory brain-stem response with notch-noise masking,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 102, 3759–3801 (1997).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. V. Popov, A. Ya. Supin, and A. M. Mass, The Sensory Physiology of Aquatic Mammals, Kluwer, Boston (2001).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Ya. Supin, M. B. Tarakanov, and M. G. Pletenko, “Frequency resolving power of the dolphin’s hearing measured by rippled noise,” Aquatic Mammals, 22, No. 3, 141–152 (1997).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. C. Teas, D. H. Eldredge, and H. Davis, “Cochlear responses to acoustic transients,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 34, 1428–1489 (1962).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. G. Wever, J. G. McCormick, H. Palin, and S. H. Ridgway, “The cochlea of the dolphin Tursiops truncatus: The basilar membrane,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 68, 2708–2711 (1971).PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. V. Popov
    • 1
  • A. Ya. Supin
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Problems in Ecology and EvolutionRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations