Advertisement

Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 179–187 | Cite as

Assessment of Exploratory Activity and Anxiety in Rats with Different Levels of Impulsive Behavior

  • A. A. Levandovskaya
  • M. I. Zaichenko
  • G. Kh. Merzhanova
  • S. V. Salozhin
Article
  • 111 Downloads

Selection of a pedal to obtain reinforcement depending on its value and delay time was used to divide rats into three groups. Animals selecting the valuable but delayed reinforcement in more than 70% of cases were assigned to the self-controlled groups, while those making this choice in fewer than 30% of case were assigned to the impulsive group and rats showing no preference in choosing reinforcement were members of the ambivalent group. The levels of orientational-exploratory activity and anxiety in rats with different types of behavior were then assessed in an elevated plus maze, on acquisition of a conditioned fear reaction (fear conditioning), and in a neophagophobia test (novelty suppressed feeding). The animals which were least active and most anxious in all tests were those of the self-controlled group. Ambivalent rats were the least anxious in the elevated plus maze test and produced the greatest number of successful trials in terms of finding and eating food in the novel context, as compared with rats of the other groups. Impulsive animals demonstrated more marked freezing reactions on acquisition of the conditioned fear reaction in the fear conditioning test and found food more quickly in the novel context.

Keywords

impulsivity rats anxiety behavioral study elevated plus maze acquisition of conditioned fear reaction feeding behavior in a novel context 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. I. Zaichenko, G. L. Vanetsian, and G. Kh. Merzhanova, “Differences in the behavior of impulsive and self-controlled rats in the open field and light–dark chamber tests,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 61, No. 3, 340–350 (2011).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. I. Zaichenko and G. Kh. Merzhanova, “Effects of blockade of D1/D2 dopamine receptors on the behavior of rats with different levels of impulsivity and self-control,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 61, No. 5, 1–10 (2011).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. I. Zaichenko, G. Kh. Merzhanova, and A. V. Demina, “Studies of the behavior of impulsive’ and ‘self-controlled’ animals using the ‘emotional resonance’ test,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 60, No. 2, 192–200 (2010).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. V. Kaluev, Stress, Anxiety, and Behavior (current problems in modeling anxious behavior in animals), CSK, Kiev (1998).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. W. Dalley, A. C. Mar, D. Economidou, and T. W. Robbins, “Neurobehavioral mechanisms of impulsivity: frontostriatal systems and functional neurochemistry,” Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 90, 250–260 (2008).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. T. Dourish, S. S. Grewal, J. K. Shepherd, et al., “Benefits of ethological analysis of behaviour,” Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 16, No. 8, 260–261 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. L. Evenden, “Varieties of impulsivity,” Psychopharmacology (Berlin), 146, No. 4, 348–361 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Fernandez and S. E. File, “The influence of open arm ledges and maze experience in the elevated plus-maze,” Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 54, No. 1, 31–40 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. E. File, “The interplay of learning and anxiety in the elevated plus-maze,” Behav. Brain Res., 58, 199–202 (1993).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. A. Gray, “A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality,” in: A Model for personality, J. J. Eysenck (ed.), Berlin (1981), pp. 246–277.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Gray and N. McNaughton, “The neurophysiology of anxiety: reprise,” Nebr. Symp. Motiv., 43, 61–134 (1996).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Griebel, C. Belzung, R. Misslin, and E. Vogel, “The free-exploratory paradigm: an effective method for measuring neophobic behavior in mice and testing potential neophobia-reducing drugs,” Behav. Pharmacol., 4, 637–644 (1993).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. L. Huskinson and K. G. Anderson, “Effects of acute and chronic administration of diazepam on delay discounting in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats,” Behav. Pharmacol., 23, No. 4, 315–330 (2012).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. Hollander and J. Rosen, “Impulsivity,” J. Psychopharmacol., 14, Supplement 1, 39–44 (2000).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. R. Homberg, B. Arends, G. Wardeh, et al., “Individual differences in the effects of serotonergic anxiolytic drugs on the motivation to self-administer cocaine,” Neuroscience, 128, No. 1, 121–130 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. A. Kerman, S. M. Clinton, T. A. Bedrosian, et al., “High novelty-seeking predicts aggression and gene expression differences within defined serotonergic cell groups,” Brain Res., 1419, 34–45 (2011).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. Lever, S. Burton, and J. O’Keefe, “Rearing on hind legs, environmental novelty, and the hippocampal formation,” Rev. Neurosci., 17, No. 1–2, 111–113 (2006).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. G. Moeller, E. S. Barratt, D. M. Dougherty, et al., “Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity,” Am. J. Psychiatry, 158, No. 11, 1783–1793 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. C. Molander, A. March, A. Norbury, et al., “High impulsivity predicting vulnerability to cocaine addiction in rats: some relationship with novelty preference but not novelty reactivity, anxiety or stress,” Psychopharmacology (Berlin), 215, No. 4, 721–731 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. Nadal, D. Rotllant, C. Márquez, and A. Armario, “Perseverance of exploration in novel environments predicts morphine place conditioning in rats,” Behav. Brain Res., 165, No. 1, 72–79 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. Pattij and L. J. Vanderschuren, “The neuropharmacology of impulsive behaviour,” Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 29, 192–199 (2008).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. V. Piazzas, S. Maccari, J. M. Deminiere, et al., “Corticosterone levels determine individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 2088–2092 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. J. Rodgers and J. C. Cole, “The elevated plus-maze: pharmacology, methodology and ethology,” in: Ethology and Pharmacology, S. J. Cooper and C. A. Hendrie (eds.) John Willey and Sons, Chichester (1994), pp. 9–44.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. J. Rodgers, J. C. Cole, K. Aboualfa, and L. H. Stephenson, “Ethopharmacological analysis of the effects of putative ‘anxiogenic’ agents in the mouse elevated plus maze,” Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 52, No. 3, 1–9 (1995).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. J. Rodgers and J. K. Sheperd, “Influence of prior maze experience on behavior and response to diazepam in the elevated plus maze and light–dark tests of anxiety in mice,” Psychopharmacology, 113, 237–242 (1993).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. L. Schramm-Sapyta, M. C. Cauley, D. K. Stangl, et al., “Role of individual and developmental differences in voluntary cocaine intake in rats,” Psychopharmacology (Berlin), 215, No. 3, 493–504 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    K. Ueno, H. Tagashi, and M. Yoshioka, “Behavioral and pharmacological studies of juvenile stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats as an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder,” Nihon Shinkei Sqaishin Yakurigaku Zasshi, 23, No. 1, 47–55 (2003).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    C. A. Winstanley, J. W. Dalley, D. E. Theobald, and T. W. Robbins, “Fractionating impulsivity: contrasting effects of central 5-HT depletion on different measures of impulsive behavior,” Neuropsychopharmacology, 29, No. 7, 1331–1343 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    C. A. Winstanley, D. M. Eagle, and T. W. Robbins, “Behavioral models of impulsivity in relation to ADHD: translation between clinical and preclinical studies,” Clin. Psychol. Rev., 26, 379–395 (2006).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Levandovskaya
    • 1
  • M. I. Zaichenko
    • 1
  • G. Kh. Merzhanova
    • 1
  • S. V. Salozhin
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and NeurophysiologyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations