Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 6–9 | Cite as

Changes in the Severity of Hypoxic Brain Damage in Rats Due to Hypoxic Postconditioning

  • M. G. Vorobiev
  • E. A. Rybnikova
  • M. O. Samoilov

The aim of the present work was to assess the neuroprotective action of postconditioning (PostC) with moderate hypobaric hypoxia (360 mmHg, 2 h) in a model of severe hypoxic brain damage (180 mmHg, 3 h). PostC consisted of three sessions of moderate hypoxia with 24-h intervals using two schemes – PostC was started 3 h (early PostC) or 24 h (late PostC) after severe hypoxia. Histological methods and automated image analysis were used to assess the extent of neuron damage in the hippocampus and neocortex seven days after severe hypoxia. Severe hypoxia led to death of 24% of neurons in layer V of the neocortex, 26% of neurons in hippocampal field CA1, and 22% of neurons in hippocampal field CA4. Early PostC prevented neuron death in field CA1 and significantly decreased the number of dead cells in field CA4 (to 10%) and the neocortex (to 13%). Delayed PostC completely prevented neuron damage in hippocampal field CA4 and the neocortex and significantly but not completely in field CA1 (12% of neurons died). These results provide evidence that PostC with moderate hypobaric hypoxia had neuroprotective effects, decreasing the extent of damage to susceptible brain formations (the hippocampus and neocortex); the efficacy of neuroprotection depended on the timing of the first session of PostC.


hypobaric hypoxia postconditioning brain damage neuroprotection hippocampus neocortex 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    E. A. Rybnikova, L. I. Khozhai, E. I. Tyulkova, et al., “Effects of hypobaric hypoxia on the expression of early gene proteins and structural changes to brain neurons: the correcting effect of preconditioning,” Morfologiya, 125, No. 2, 10–15 (2004).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. O. Samoilov, E. A. Rybnikova, E. I. Tyulkova, et al., “Effects of hypobaric hypoxia on behavioral reactions and early gene expression in the rat brain: the correcting effects of preconditioning,” Dokl. Ros. Akad. Nauk., 81, No. 1, 1–3, (2001).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Chapuisat, M. A. Dronne, E. Grenier, et al., “In silico study of the influence of intensity and duration of blood flow reduction on cell death through necrosis or apoptosis during acute ischemic stroke,” Acta Biother., 58, No. 2–3, 171–190 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Leconte, E. Tixier, T. Freret, et al., “Delayed hypoxic postconditioning protects against cerebral ischemia in the mouse,” Stroke, 40, No. 10, 3349–3355 (2009).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Paxinos and C. Watson, The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, Academic Press, San Diego, 2nd edition (1986).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. A. Rybnikova, T. Gluschenko, E. Tyulkova, et al., “Preconditioning induces prolonged expression of transcription factors pCREB and NF-kappaB in the neocortex of rats before and following severe hypobaric hypoxia,” J. Neurochem., 106, No. 3, 1450–1458 (2008).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. A. Rybnikova, N. Sitnik, T. Gluschenko, et al., “The preconditioning modified neuronal expression of apoptosis-related proteins of Bcl-2 superfamily following severe hypobaric hypoxia in rats,” Brain Res., 1089, No. 1, 195–202 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. A. Rybnikova, L. Vataeva, E. Tyulkova, et al., “Preconditioning prevents impairment of passive avoidance learning and suppression of brain NGFI-A expression induced by severe hypoxia,” Behav. Brain Res., 160, No. 1, 107–114 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Zhao, “Ischemic postconditioning as a novel avenue to protect against brain injury after stroke,” J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 29, No. 5, 873–885 (2009).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Z. Q. Zhao, J. S. Corvera, M. E. Halkos, et al., “Inhibition of myocardial injury by ischemic postconditioning during reperfusion: comparison with ischemic preconditioning,” Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol., 285, No. 2, 579–588 (2003).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. G. Vorobiev
    • 1
  • E. A. Rybnikova
    • 1
  • M. O. Samoilov
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for the Regulation of Brain Neuron Function (Director: Professor M. O. Samoilov), I. P. Pavlov Institute of PhysiologyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations