Interactions and Firing Patterns of Rabbit Amygdalar Neurons in Unconditioned Fear Manifested as Freezing
The characteristics of the operation of the amygdalar neural network in unconditioned fear were identified by studying the interactions and nature of the spike activity of individual neurons in the basal and central nuclei of the amygdala in rabbits during freezing (fear), active unconditioned motor reactions (absence of fear), and in response to emotionally significant stimuli, as well as in calm waking. When rabbits froze, there were specific changes in the interactions of close-lying amygdalar neurons as compared with other states; these changes were not seen in the spike activity of individual neurons. Freezing increased the numbers of short-latency (up to 100 msec) excitatory connections and decreased the numbers of long-latency (250–450 msec) inhibitory connections. Neuron interactions were seen at frequencies in the delta2 range (2–4 Hz) more often in this state than in others. When the animals made active motor responses to the stimulus, there were decreases in the numbers of interacting neurons and increases in the numbers of longlatency (200–250 msec) excitatory and short-latency (50–200 msec) inhibitory connections, and a greater proportion of interactions occurred at frequencies of the theta1 range more frequently than in other states. Thus, the balance between the excitatory and inhibitory components of the amygdalar neural network is important for the occurrence of fear.
Key wordsamygdala neuron interaction freezing orientational-investigative reactions unconditioned shaking reflex
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.P. Bogach and B. L. Ganzha, “High-frequency synchronized activity in the amygdala as an EEG parameter of a number of psychophysiological states,” in: Problems in Hypothalamic Physiology [in Russian], Universitet, Kiev (1973), pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
- 2.Y. Buresh, M. Petarn, and I. Zakhar, Electrophysiological Study Methods [Russian translation], Foreign Literature Press, Moscow (1962).Google Scholar
- 3.D. A. Zhukov, “The psychogenetics of stress,” in: Behavioral and Endocrine Correlates of Genetic Determinants of Stress Reactivity in Uncontrollable Situations [in Russian], St. Petersburg Center for Scientific and Technical Information, St. Petersburg (1996).Google Scholar
- 4.R. Yu. Ilyuchenok, M. A. Gilinskii, L. V. Loskutova, N. I. Dubrovina, and N. V. Volf, The Amygdaloid Complex (connections, behavior, memory) [in Russian], Nauka, Novosibirsk (1981).Google Scholar
- 5.I. V. Pavlova, “Interaction of neurons in the hippocampus and frontal cortex in emotionally negative situations in active and passive rabbits,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 59, No. 1, 75–86 (2009).Google Scholar
- 6.I. V. Pavlova, I. P. Levshina, G. L. Vanetsian,Yu. V. Pavlov, N. N. Shuikin, and E. A. Zyablitseva, “Effects of emotionally significant stimuli on behavior and respiration in rabbits with different movement activity in an open field,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 56, No. 1, 65–74 (2006).Google Scholar
- 7.P. V. Simonov, The Motivated Brain [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1987).Google Scholar
- 15.K. Jungling, T. Seidenbecher, L. Sosulina, J. Lesting, S. Sangha, S. D. Clark, N. Okamura, D. M. Duangdao, Y.-L. Xu, R. K. Reinscheid, and H. C. Pape, “Neuropeptide S-mediated control of fear expression and extinction: role of intercalated GABAergic neurons in the amygdala,” Neuron, 59, 298–310 (2008).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.G. Liebsch, R. Landgraf, R. Gerstberger, J. C. Probst, C. T. Wotjak, M. Engelmann, F. Holsboer, and A. Montkowski, “Chronic infusion of a CHR1 receptor antisense oligodeoxynucleotide into the central nucleus of the amygdale reduced anxiety-related behavior in socially defeated rats,” Regul. Pept., 59, No. 2, 229–239 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.C. E. Macedo, V. M. Castilho, M. A. De Souza e Silva, and M. L. Brandao, “Dual 5-HT mechanisms in basolateral and central nuclei of amygdale in the regulation of the defensive behavior induced by electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus,” Brain Res. Bull., 59, No. 3, 189–195 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.H. Van Lier, A. M. Coenen, and W. H. Drinkenburg, “Behavioral transitions modulate hippocampal electroencephalogram correlates of open field behavior in the rat: support for a sensorimotor function of hippocampal rhythmical synchronous activity,” J. Neurosci., 23, No. 6, 2459–2465 (2003).PubMedGoogle Scholar