Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 679–686 | Cite as

Reversible and Irreversible Stages in the Development of Amnesia after Disruption of the Reactivation of Associative Memory in Snails

  • S. V. Solntseva
  • V. P. Nikitin

Our previous studies on common snails have demonstrated that inhibition of NMDA glutamate receptors during reactivation of a skill consisting of refusal of a defined foodstuff leads to impairment of long-term memory. We report here our studies of the dynamics of the development of amnesia. Snails were trained to refuse a defined foodstuff and were injected 24 h later with the NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist MK-801, and were then presented with the conditioned food stimulus (a reminder). Testing on days 1 and 3 after exposure to MK-801 and the reminder showed gradual decreases in the number of refusals of the conditioned food stimulus. Repeat training of the animals to refuse the same foodstuff performed during these periods led to restoration of the skill seen after the initial training. The number of refusals by snails of the conditioned food stimulus 10 days after MK-801 and the reminder decreased to a minimal level. Repeat training at this time did not lead to the formation of a conditioned reflex to food. Thus, we have provided the first demonstration that impairment of the reactivation of long-term memory induces two stages in the development of amnesia. The first, reversible, stage, which lasted less than 10 days, was characterized by the potential for long-term memory to be restored by repeat training of the snails. The second, irreversible, stage developed 10 days after induction of amnesia and was characterized by disruption of the ability of long-term memory to be restored. These results may have practical value in terms of understanding the mechanisms of acute memory loss due to trauma and neurological diseases.

Key words

learning long-term memory reconsolidation amnesia NMDA glutamate receptors acute memory loss common snail 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. A. Saushkina, S. V. Solntseva, I. F. Komar’kov, V. P. Nikitin, and V. V. Sherstnev, “Different mechanisms are involved in contextual memory during reproduction of an associative skill in the common snail,” Neirokhimiya, 24, No. 4, 312–317 (2007).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. V. Solntseva and V. P. Nikitin, “Serotonin and NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists selectively impair reactivation of associative memory in the common snail,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh., 93, No. 10, 1101–1111 (2007).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. V. Solntseva, V. P. Nikitin, S. A. Kozyrev, A. V. Shevelkin, A. V. Lagutin, and V. V. Sherstnev, “Inhibition of protein synthesis during reactivation of associative memory in the common snail evokes transient or irreversible amnesia,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh., 92, No. 9, 1058–1068 (2006).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. M. Alberini, M. H. Milekic, and S. Tronel, “Mechanisms of memory stabilization and destabilization,” Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 63, No. 9, 999–1008 (2006).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. K. Andry and M. W. Luttges, “Memory traces: experimental separation by cycloheximide and electroconvulsive shock,” Science, 178, No. 60, 518–520 (1972).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. V. Anokhin, A. A. Tiunova, and S. P. R. Rose, “Reminder effects – reconsolidation or retrieval deficit? Pharmacological dissection with protein synthesis inhibitors following reminder for a passiveavoidance task in young chicks,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 15, No. 11, 1759–1765 (2002).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. M. Balaban, “Declarative and procedural memory in animals with simple nervous systems,” in: Psychology at the Turn of the Millennium, C. Hofsten (ed.), Academic Press, Stockholm (2002), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. N. Gainutdinova, R. R. Tagirova, A. I. Ismailova, L. N. Muranova, E. I. Samarova, K. L. Gainutdinov, and P. M. Balaban, “Reconsolidation of a context long-term memory in the terrestrial snail requires protein synthesis,” Learn. Mem., 12, No. 6, 620–625 (2005).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. E. Gold, “The many faces of amnesia,” Learn. Mem., 13, No. 5, 506–514 (2006).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. W. Graham, F. Wu, S. Schacher, and D. J. Goldberg, “Initiating morphological changes associated with long-term facilitation in Aplysia is independent of transcription or translation in the cell body,” J. Neurobiol., 64, No. 2, 202–212 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. D. Hawkins, E. R. Kandel, and C. H. Bailey, “Molecular mechanisms of memory storage in Aplysia,” Biol. Bull., 210, No. 3, 174–191 (2006).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. F. Lynch, “Long-term potentiation and memory,” Physiol. Rev., 84, No. 1, 87–136 (2004).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. A. Miller and J. D. Sweatt, “Amnesia or retrieval deficit? Implications of a molecular approach to the question of reconsolidation,” Learn. Mem., 13, No. 5, 498–505 (2006).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Nader, “A single standard for memory; the case for reconsolidation,” Debates in Neuroscience, 1, No. 1, 2–16 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Nader and S. H. Wang, “Fading in,” Learn. Mem., 13, No. 5, 530–553 (2006).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. E. Pedreira, L. M. Perez-Cuesta, and H. Maldonado, “Reactivation and reconsolidation of long-term memory in the crab Chasmagnathus: protein synthesis requirement and mediation by NMDA-type glutamatergic receptors,” J. Neurosci., 22, No. 18, 8305–8311 (2002).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Quartermain and B. S. McEwen, “Temporal characteristics of amnesia induced by protein synthesis inhibitor: determination by shock level,” Nature, 228, No. 5282, 677–678 (1970).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. L. Rechart, C. J. Sandoval, F. Bermudez-Rattoni, and A. Routtenberg, “Remodeling of hippocampal mossy fibers is selectively induced seven days after the acquisition of a spatial but not a cued reference memory task,” Learn. Mem., 14, No. 6, 416–421 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. C. Riccio, P. M. Millin, and A. R. Bogart, “Reconsolidation: a brief history, a retrieval view, and some recent issues,” Learn. Mem., 13, No. 5, 536–544 (2006).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. C. Riccio, P. M. Millin, and A. R. Bogart, “The substrate for longlasting memory: if not protein synthesis, then what?” Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., 89, No. 3, 225–233 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. J. Sara and B. Hars, “In memory of consolidation,” Learn. Mem., 13, No. 5, 515–521 (2006).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    L. R. Squire and S. H. Barondes, “Variable decay of memory and its recovery in cycloheximide-treated mice,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 69, No. 6, 1416–1420 (1972).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    T. Tada and M. Sheng, “Molecular mechanisms of dendritic spine morphogenesis,” Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 16, No. 1, 95–101 (2006).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    N. C. Tronson and J. R. Taylor, “Molecular mechanisms of memory reconsolidation,” Nat. Rev./Neuroscience, 8, No. 4, 262–275 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. L. Wainwright, J. H. Byrne, and L. J. Cleary, “Dissociation of morphological and physiological changes associated with long-term memory in Aplysia,” J. Neurophysiol., 92, No. 4, 2628–2632 (2004).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. L. Wainwright, H. Zhang, J. H. Byrne, and L. J. Cleary, “Localized neuronal outgrowth induced by long-term sensitization training in Aplysia,” J. Neurosci., 22, No. 10, 4132–4141 (2002).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    C. L. Waites, A. M. Craig, and C. C. Garner, “Mechanisms of vertebrate synaptogenesis,” Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 28, 251–274 (2005).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Anokhin Research Institute of Normal PhysiologyRussian Academy of Medical SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations