Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 541–548 | Cite as

Role of the motor cortex in the rearrangement of a natural movement coordination in dogs

  • O. G. Pavlova
  • V. N. Mats
  • V. N. Ponomarev


Chronic experiments on dogs were performed to study the activity of the shoulder muscles involved in elevating the forelimb used by the animal to lift a food-containing cup and keep it elevated during eating. At the early stage of acquisition of this operant reaction, limb-lifting occurred with an anticipatory upward head movement; lowering of the head to the feeder was associated with lowering of the lifted limb. The new coordination required for food to be obtained, i.e., maintaining the elevated limb in a posture with the head lowered, could only be achieved as a result of learning. In untrained dogs with the natural coordination, elevation of the limb occurred with activation of the deltoid and teres major muscles, teres minor being active on standing but ceasing its activity before limb elevation. During training the activity of the teres minor muscle changed to the opposite pattern. Limb elevation in the learned coordination was accompanied by activation of all three shoulder flexors. Lesioning of the motor cortex in the projection area of the “working” limb, but not in other areas, led to impairments of the acquired coordination and a new pattern of shoulder muscle activity. These data led to the conclusion that rearrangement of the initial coordination was linked with the formation of a new means of elevating the limb in which the muscle pattern was supported by the motor cortex.

Key words

motor cortex rearrangement of innate coordination electromyogram dogs 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    O. S. Adrianov and T. A. Mering, Atlas of the Dog Brain [in Russian], Medgiz, Moscow (1959).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. A. Bernshtein, The Structure of Movements [in Russian], State Medical Literature Press, Moscow (1947).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. E. Ioffe, Corticospinal Mechanisms of Operant Motor Reactions [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1975).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. G. Pavlova and V. N. Mats, “Role of projection areas of the motor cortex in the rearrangement of a natural coordination of head and forepaw movements in dogs,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 55, No. 6, 822–832 (2005).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O. G. Pavlova, A. G. Frolov, and A. V. Aleksandrov, “A natural coordination of head and paw movements in dogs and its rearrangement during training,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 51, No. 1, 40–51 (2001).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    O. G. Pavlova and O. V. Yuchkina, “Recording of electromyograms in chronic conditions in dogs,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 57, No. 2, 237–242 (2007).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. I. Popova, Operant Motor Reflexes; Conditioned Reflex Theory Aspects [in Russian], Author’s Abstract of Doctoral Thesis in Medical Sciences, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow (1970).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Armand and B. Kalby, “Recovery of distal skills after neonatal lesion of the sensorimotor cortex in the cat,” Neurosci. Lett., 138, 45–48 (1992).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. G. Chusid, C. G. de Guiterrez-Mahoney, and E. Robinson, “The ‘motor’ cortex of the dog,” Fed. Proc., 8, 25 (1949).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. E. Ioffe, “Pyramidal influence in establishment of new motor coordinations in dogs,” Physiol. Behav., 11, No. 2, 145–153 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Gorska, “Functional organization of cortical motor areas in the dog and puppies,” Acta Neurobiol. Exper., 34, 171–203 (1974).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. Gorska and E. Sybirska, “Effects of pyramidal lesions on forelimb movements in the cat,” Acta Neurobiol. Exper., 40, 843–859 (1980).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. G. Lawrence and H. G. J. M. Kuypers, “The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey,” Brain, 91, No. 1, 1–14 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. K. S. Lim, Ch.-N. Liu, and R. L. Moffitt, A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Dog’s Brain, Charles C. Thomas Publishers, Springfield, Illinois (1960).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. E. Miller, Anatomy of the Dog, W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, London (1964).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. B. Muir and R. N. Lemon, “Corticospinal neurons with a special role in precision grip,” Brain Res., 261, 312–316 (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. G. Phillips and R. Porter, Corticospinal Neurons: Their Role in Movement, Academic Press, London (1977).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. B. Thomson, G. E. Loeb, and J. R. Richmond, “Effect of neck posture on the activation of feline neck muscles during voluntary head turns,” J. Neurophysiol., 72, No. 4, 2004–2014 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Wieseldanger, “Some aspects of pyramidal tract functions in primates,” in: New Developments in EMG and Clinical Neurophysiology, J. E. Desmedt (ed.), S. Karger, Basel (1973), Vol. 3, pp. 159–174.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. P. Wise, Motor cortex. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, G. Adelman and B. H. Smith (eds.), Birkhauser, Inc., Boston (1999), pp. 1221–1223.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and NeurophysiologyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations