Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 37, Issue 6, pp 559–570 | Cite as

A new mechanism of synapse-specific neuronal plasticity

  • V. P. Nikitin


According to current concepts, long-term memory is based on structural-functional changes in particular synaptic connections between neurons in the brain (synapse-specific plasticity), which depend on the processes of translation and transcription. Studies on neurons in the mollusk Aplysia and the mammalian hippocampus have addressed a mechanism of synapse-specific plasticity which does not require synapse-specific molecular genetic processes. Stimulation of a synapse has been shown to lead to activation of intracellular second messengers in the synapse as well as “synaptic tagging”-the formation of mechanisms “recognizing” transcription products. In the neuron body, second messengers induce the synthesis of RNA and protein molecules which are widely distributed in neuron processes and which are inserted selectively only into stimulation-tagged synapses, evoking long-term changes in their functional and morphological characteristics. The results of our studies on common snail defensive behavior command neurons LPl1 and RPl1 suggest the existence of another mechanism controlling synapse-specific plasticity. On acquisition of sensitization, a number of second messengers and the genes controlled by them are involved in supporting the plasticity of defined synaptic inputs of these neurons in snails. The processes of induction of long-term facilitation in the sensory inputs of neurons from chemoreceptors on the head have been shown to involve cAMP and cAMP-dependent transcription factors of the immediate early gene C/EBP (CAAT/enhancer binding protein), while the mechanisms controlling the other sensory input of neurons LPl1 and RPl1-from mechanoreceptors on the head-involve protein kinase C and protein kinase C-dependent transcription factor SRF (serum response factor). The immediate early gene zif268 is involved in controlling the inputs from both chemo-and mechanoreceptors on the head. These results are regarded as experimental support for the hypothesis that the molecular mechanisms of synapse-specific plasticity during learning may form on the basis of a selective neurochemical “projection” of the synaptic connections onto defined genes in the neuron.

Key words

learning nociceptive sensitization mollusk neuron synapse-specific plasticity intracellular second messengers transcription factors CAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) serum response factor (SRF) zif268 (erg-1) 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. K. Anokhin, “Systems analysis of the integrative activity of neurons,” Usp. Fiziol. Nauk., 5, No. 2, 5–92 (1974).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. N. Grinkevich, “Formation of C/EBP transcription factors and possibly pathways for the regulation of their activity on learning in Helix,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 51, No. 1, 81–88 (2001).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. N. Grinkevich, P. D. Lisachev, and T. I. Merkulova, “Formation of AP-1 transcription factors on learning in Helix,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 87, No. 6, 762–773 (2001).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. A. Maksimova and P. M. Balaban, Neuronal Mechanisms of the Plasticity of Behavior [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1983).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. P. Nikitin, “The transient stage of long-term synaptic facilitation in defensive behavior command neurons in sensitized snails,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 85, No. 1, 36–47 (1999).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. P. Nikitin and S. A. Kozyrev, “Dynamics of defensive and feeding reactions during the acquisition of sensitization in the common snail,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 41, No. 3, 478–489 (1991).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. P. Nikitin and S. A. Kozyrev, “Generalized and signal-specific long-term nociceptive sensitization in the common snail,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 45, No. 4, 732–741 (1995).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. P. Nikitin and S. A. Kozyrev, “The actions of cAMP on the excitability and responses of defensive behavior command neurons in the common snail, evoked by sensory stimulation,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 85, No. 2, 237–245 (1999).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. P. Nikitin and S. A. Kozyrev, “The critical role of intracellular calcium in the mechanisms of plasticity of defensive behavior command neurons LPl1 and RPl1 in the common snail in nociceptive sensitization,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 52, No. 3, 326–333 (2002).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. P. Nikitin and S. A. Kozyrev, “Selective involvement of opioid peptides in the mechanisms of synapse-specific plasticity in the common snail during the acquisition of sensitization,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 53, No. 6, 755–763 (2003).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. P. Nikitin and S. A. Kozyrev, “Induction of long-term synaptic facilitation in defensive behavior command neurons in the common snail during the acquisition of sensitization depends on RNA synthesis,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 54, No. 2, 260–268 (2004).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. P. Nikitin and S. A. Kozyrev, “Protein kinase C is selectively involved in the mechanisms of long-term synapse-specific plasticity,” Byull. Éksperim. Biol. Med., 139, No. 6, 639–642 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. P. Nikitin and S. A. Kozyrev, “Antisense oligonucleotides to mRNA for the immediate early gene zif268_selectively suppresses synaptic facilitation in neurons in sensitized snails,” in: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Neurocybernetics, Rostovon-Don (2005).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. P. Nikitin and S. A. Kozyrev, “The transcription factor serum response factor is selectively involved in the mechanisms of longterm synapse-specific plasticity,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 91, No. 11, 1252–1259 (2005).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. P. Nikitin, S. A. Kozyrev, and A. V. Shevelkin, “Antagonists of NMDA glutamate receptors selectively influence the synaptic mechanisms of nociceptive sensitization in snails,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 50, No. 4, 686–696 (2000).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. P. Nikitin, S. A. Kozyrev, and A. V. Shevelkin, “Inactivation of C/EBP transcription factors specifically influences synaptic plasticity of neurons in the common snail,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 90, No. 4, 455–462 (2004).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. S. Pivovarov, “Cholinoreceptors on snail neurons: identification, plasticity, and its regulation by opioids and second messengers,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 42, No. 6, 1271–1286 (1992).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. O. Samoilov, The Brain and Adaptation: Molecular-Cellular Mechanisms [in Russian], I. P. Pavlov Institute of Physiology, St. Petersburg (1999).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. N. Sokolov, “Architecture of the reflex arc,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 42, No. 6, 1064–1074 (1992).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. I. Solntseva, “The role of cAMP in the electrophysiological effects of morphine and enkephalins,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 43, No. 5, 946–952 (1993).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. V. Shevelkin, V. P. Nikitin, S. A. Kozyrev, M. O. Samoilov, and V. V. Sherstnev, “Serotonin imitates several of the neuronal effects of nociceptive sensitization in the common snail,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 47, No. 3, 532–542 (1997).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. M. Alberini, M. Ghirardi, R. Metz, and E. R. Kandel, “C/EBP is an immediate-early gene required for the consolidation of long-term facilitation in Aplysia,” Cell, 76, No. 6, 1099–1114 (1994).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. H. Bailey, M. Giustetto, Y.-Y. Huang, R. D. Hawkins, and E. R. Kandel, “Is heterosynaptic modulation essential for stabilizing hebbian plasticity and memory?” Nature Res. Neurosci., 1, No. 1, 11–20 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    P. M. Balaban, “Cellular mechanisms of behavioral plasticity in terrestrial snail,” Neurosci. Behav. Rev., 26, No. 5, 597–630 (2002).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. Barco, J. M. Alarcon, and E. R. Kandel, “Expression of constitutively active CREB protein facilitates the late phase of long-term potentiation by enhancing synaptic capture,” Cell, 108, No. 5, 689–703 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    G. Buchwalter, C. Gross, and B. Wasylyk, “Ets ternary complex transcription factors,” Gene, 324, No. 1, 1–14 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. H. Byrne and E. R. Kandel, “Presynaptic facilitation revisited: state and time dependence,” J. Neurosci., 16, No. 2, 425–435 (1996).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Cammarota, L. R. Bevilaqua, P. Ardenghi, G. Paratcha, M. Levi de Stein, I. Izquierdo, and J. H. Medina, “Learning-associated activation of nuclear MAPK, CREB and Elk-1, along with Fos production, in the rat hippocampus after a one-trial avoidance learning: abolition by NMDA receptor blockade,” Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 76, No. 1, 36–46 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. Casadio, K. C. Martin, M. Giustetto, H. Zhu, M. Chen, D. Bartsch, C. H. Bailey, and E. R. Kandel, “A transient, neuron-wide form of CREB-mediated long-term facilitation can be stabilized at specific synapses by local protein synthesis,” Cell, 99, No. 10, 221–237 (1999).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    H. P. Davis and L. R. Squire, “Protein synthesis and memory: A review,” Psychol. Bull., 96, No. 3, 518–558 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    S. Davis, P. Vanhoutte, C. Pages, J. Caboche, and S. Laroche, “The MAPK/ERK cascade targets both Elk-1 and cAMP response element-binding protein to control long-term potentiation-dependent gene expression in the dentate gyrus in vivo,” J. Neurosci., 20, No. 12, 4563–4572 (2000).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    W. R. Duan, M. Ito, Y. Park, E. T. Maizels, M. Hunzicker-Dunn, and L. J. Jameson, “GnRH regulates early growth response protein 1 transcription through multiple promoter elements,” Mol. Endocrinol., 16, No. 2, 221–223 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    F. Engert and T. Bonhoeffer, “Synapse specificity of long-term potentiation breaks down at short distances,” Nature, 388, No. 6639, 279–284 (1997).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    U. Frey and R. G. Morris, “Synaptic tagging and long-term potentiation,” Nature, 385, No. 6616, 533–536 (1997).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    P. Goelet, F. Castellucci, S. Schacher, and E. Kandel, “The long and short of long-term memory-a molecular framework,” Nature, 322, No. 6078, 419–422 (1986).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    E. R. Kandel, “The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses,” Science, 294, No. 5544, 1030–1038 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    M. Kavaliers, E. Choleris, and D. M. Saucier, “The NMDA receptor antagonist, NPC 12626, reduces the pronociceptive effects of orphanin FQ and kappa opiate antinociception in the land snail, Cepaea nemoralis,” Peptides, 18, No. 7, 943–947 (1997).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    J. A. Lee, H. K. Kim, K. H. Kim, J. H. Han, Y. S. Lee, C. S. Lim, D. J. Chang, T. K. Kubo, and B. K. Kaang, “Overexpression of and RNA interference with the CCAAT enhancer-binding protein on long-term facilitation of Aplysia sensory to motor synapses,” Learn. Mem., 8, No. 4, 220–226 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    D. Lichtstein and D. Rodbard, “A second look at the second messenger hypothesis,” Life Sci., 40, No. 24, 2041–2051 (1987).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    M. F. Lynch, “Long-term potentiation and memory,” Physiol. Rev., 84, No. 1, 87–137 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    S. Marinesco and T. J. Carew, “Serotonin release evoked by tail nerve stimulation in the CNS of Aplysia: characterization and relationship to heterosynaptic plasticity,” J. Neurosci., 22, No. 6, 2299–2312 (2002).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    K. C. Martin, A. Casadio, H. E. Y. Zhu, J. C. Rose, M. Chen, C. H. Bailey, and E. R. Kandel, “Synapse-specific, long-term facilitation of Aplysia sensory to motor synapses: a function for local protein synthesis in memory storage,” Cell, 91, No. 7, 927–938 (1997).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    K. C. Martin and K. S. Kosik, “Synaptic tagging-who’s it? Nature Reviews,” Nature Reviews Neurosci., 3, No. 10, 813–820 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    J. B. Rosen, “The neurobiology of conditioned and unconditioned fear: a neurobehavioral system analysis of the amygdala,” Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev., 3, No. 1, 23–41 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    E. M. Schuman, “Synapse specificity and long-term information storage,” Neuron, 18, No. 3, 339–342 (1997).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    W. S. Sossin, “Mechanisms for the generation of synapse specificity in long-term memory: the implications of a requirement for transcription,” Trends Neurosci., 19, No. 6, 215–218 (1996).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    O. Steward and E. M. Schuman, “Compartmentalized synthesis and degradation of proteins in neurons,” Neuron, 40, No. 10, 347–359 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    S. Sugita, D. A. Baxter, and J. H. Byrne, “Modulation of a cAMP/protein kinase A cascade by protein kinase C in sensory neurons of Aplysia,” J. Neurosci., 17, No. 19, 7237–7244 (1997).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    S. M. Taubendfeld, K. A. Wiig, B. Monti, B. Dolan, G. Pollonini, and C. M. Alberini, “Fornix-dependent induction of hippocampal CCAAT enhancer-binding protein [beta] and [delta] co-localizes with phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein and accompanies long-term memory consolidation,” J. Neurosci., 21. No. 1, 84–91 (2001).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    A. L. Vaccarino, G. A. Olson, R. D. Olson, and A. J. Kastin, “Endogenous opiates: 1998,” Peptides, 20, No. 10, 1527–1574 (1999).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    A. E. West, E. C. Griffith, and M. E. Greenberg, “Regulation of transcription factors by neuronal activity,” Nature Rev. Neurosci., 3, No. 12, 921–931 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    R. Yuste and W. Denk, “Dendritic spines as basic functional units of neuronal integration,” Nature, 375, No. 6355, 682–684 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. P. Nikitin
    • 1
  1. 1.P. K. Anokhin Research Institute of Normal PhysiologyRussian Academy of Medical SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations