Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 203–207 | Cite as

Protein Synthesis-Dependent Reactivation of a Contextual Conditioned Reflex in the Common Snail

  • T. Kh. Gainutdinova
  • R. R. Tagirova
  • A. I. Ismailova
  • L. N. Muranova
  • Kh. L. Gainutdinov
  • P. M. Balaban


We report here a study of the effects of blockade of protein synthesis with anisomycin during reactivation of a contextual conditioned reflex in the common snail. The amplitudes of the defensive reactions of snails to standard tactile stimulation before training were identical in two conditions: 1) testing of responses of snails fixed by the shell to a plastic ball floating in water and 2) on the surface of the terrarium glass. After applying electric shocks to the snails' skin for 5 days, a significant difference in responses reflecting the formation of a contextual conditioned reflex was seen in only one of the contexts. Placing trained snails in the same context (reminding) two days after training with simultaneous injection of anisomycin led to significant weakening of training, while control injections of physiological saline produced no such changes. These data suggest that the mechanisms of memory consolidation after training and reminding are not identical.

Key words

learning contextual conditioned reflex protein synthesis blockade anisomycin 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. M. Balaban and I. S. Zakharov, Learning and Development — A Basis for Two Phenomena [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1991).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. V. Shevelkin, “Facilitation of defensive reactions during food consumption in common snails: involvement of glucose and gastrin/cholecystokinin-like peptide,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 42, No.6, 1235–1249 (1992).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. V. Anokhin, A. A. Tiunova, and S. P. Rose, “Reminder effects-reconsolidation or retrieval deficit? Pharmacological dissection with protein synthesis inhibitors following reminder for a passive-avoidance task in young chicks,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 15, No.11, 1759–1765 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. I. Arshavsky, “Cellular and network properties in the functioning of the nervous system: from central pattern generators to cognition,” Brain Res. Rev., 41, No.2, 229–267 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. M. Balaban, “Declarative and procedural memory in animals with simple nervous systems,” in: Psychology at the Turn of the Millennium, C. Hofsten (ed.), Academic Press, Stockholm (2002), Vol. 1, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. M. Balaban, “Cellular mechanisms of behavioral plasticity in terrestrial snail,” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 26, No.5, 597–630 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. M. Balaban and N. I. Bravarenko, “Long-term sensitization and environmental conditioning in terrestrial cells,” Exptl. Brain Res., 96, No.2, 487–493 (1993).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Bourtchouladze, T. Abel, and N. Berman, “Different training procedures recruit either one or two critical periods for contextual memory consolidation, each of which requires protein synthesis and PKA,” Learn. Mem., 5, No.2, 365–374 (1998).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. J. Carew and M. A. Sutton, “Molecular stepping stones in memory consolidation,” Nat. Neurosci., 4, No.8, 769–771 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Crow, J. J. Xue-Bian, and V. Siddiq, “Protein synthesis-dependent and mRNA synthesis-independent intermediate phase of memory in Hermissenda,” J. Neurophysiol., 82, No.3, 495–500 (1999).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. P. Davis and L. R. Squire, “Protein synthesis and memory: a review,” Psychological. Bull., 96, No.4, 518–559 (1984).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. Hamakawa, M. A. Woodin, and M. C. Bjorgum, “Excitatory synaptogenesis between identified Lymnaea neurons requires extrinsic trophic factors and is mediated by receptor tyrosine kinases,” J. Neurosci., 19, No.21, 9306–9312 (1999).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Maulshagen, G. R. Parker, and T. J. Carew, “Dynamics of induction and expression of long-term synaptic facilitation in Aplysia,” J. Neurosci., 16, No.18, 7099–7108 (1996).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. L. McGaugh, “Memory-a century of consolidation,” Science, 287, No.5451, 248–251 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. R. Misanin, R. R. Miller, and D. J. Lewis, “Retrograde amnesia produced by electroconvulsive shock after reactivation of a consolidated memory trace,” Science, 160, No.827, 554–555 (1968).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Nader, G. E. Schafe, and J. E. LeDoux, “Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval,” Nature, 406, No.6797, 722–726 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Quevedo, M. R. M. Vianno, and R. Roesler, “Two time windows of anisomycine-induced amnesia for inhibitory avoidance training in rats: protection from amnesia by pretraining but not pre-exposure to the task apparatus,” Learn. Mem., 6, No.4, 600–607 (1999).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. J. Sara, “Retrieval and reconsolidation: toward a neurobiology of remembering,” Learn. Mem., 7, No.1, 73–84 (2000).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. A. Sutton and T. J. Carew, “Parallel molecular pathways mediate expression of distinct forms of intermediate-term facilitation at tail sensory-motor synapses in Aplysia,” 26, No.1, 219–231 (2000).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. A. Sutton, J. Ide, S. E. Masters, and T. J. Carew, “Interaction between amount and pattern of training in the induction of intermediate-and long-term memory for sensitization in Aplysia,” Learn. Mem., 9, No.1, 29–40 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. M. Taubenfield, M. H. Milekic, B. Monti, and C. M. Alberini, “The consolidation of new but not reactivated memory requires hippocampal C/EBPbeta,” Nat. Neurosci., 8, No.8, 813–818 (2001).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. A. Tiunova, K. V. Anokhin, and S. P. Rose, “Two critical periods of protein and glycoprotein synthesis in memory consolidation for visual categorization learning in chick,” Learn. Mem., 4, No.4, 401–410 (1998).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Kh. Gainutdinova
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. R. Tagirova
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. I. Ismailova
    • 1
    • 2
  • L. N. Muranova
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kh. L. Gainutdinov
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. M. Balaban
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Kazan' Physicotechnical Institute, Kazan' Scientific CenterRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and NeurophysiologyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations