Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 115–118 | Cite as

Use of P300 Cognitive Evoked Potentials in the Diagnosis of Impairments of Higher Mental Functions after Cardiac Surgery in Conditions of Cardiopulmonary Bypass

  • Yu. I. Buziashvili
  • Yu. A. Aleksakhina
  • S. G. Ambat'ello
  • S. T. Matskeplishvili


A total of 40 patients with ischemic heart disease undergoing aortocoronary shunting surgery in conditions of cardiopulmonary bypass were studied. Parameters of the P300 cognitive evoked potentials were studied before surgery and 7–9 days after surgery. Neurological and neuropsychological assessments were also performed. The most significant parameters of the P300 potential were found to be the latencies of the P3 and N2 components, increases in which showed positive correlations with the extent of the developing cognitive deficit. Evidence supporting the neuroprotective effects of Trasylol given during surgery was obtained. Patients given Trasylol showed less marked cognitive deficit and smaller changes in P300 parameters. Analysis of the P300 cognitive evoked potential can be recommended for detecting early cognitive dysfunction and assessing the efficacy of neuroprotective therapy in patients undergoing surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Key words

cognitive evoked potentials P300 cognitive functions sequelae of cardiac surgery 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L. A. Bokeriya and R. G. Gudkova, Concepts of the Development of Cardiovascular Surgery in Russia, 2002–2006 [in Russian], A. N. Bakulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery Press, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences (2001), p. 4.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. V. Gnezditskii, Evoked Brain Potentials Clinical Practice [in Russian], Taganrog (1997).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. V. Egorov, V. V. Gnezditskii, Yu. M. Koptelov, et al., “Analysis of dipole sources of CEP (P300) in the human brain,” in: Proceedings of the Conference on Current Progress in Methods of Non-Invasive Diagnosis in Medicine [in Russian], Gurzuf, Yalta (Ukraine) (1996), pp. 106–108.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Engelhardt et al., “P300-mapping — a neurophysiological tool to quantify cerebral dysfunction after coronary artery bypass grafting,” Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., 9, 12–17 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. S. Goodin and M. J. Aminoff, “Electrophysiological differences between demented and nondemented patients with Parkinson's disease,” Ann. Neurol., 21, 90–94 (1987).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. S. Goodin and M. J. Aminoff, “Electrophysiological differences between subtypes of dementia,” Brain, 109, 1103–1113 (1986).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Grimm, et al., “Normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass is beneficial for cognitive brain function after coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomised trial,” Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., 18, No.3, 270–275 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. S. Isbir, R. Dogan, M. Demircin, et al., “Aprotinin reduces the IL-8 after coronary artery bypass grafting,” Cardiovasc. Surg., 9, 403–406 (2001).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Kostulas, S. H. Pelidou, P. Kivisakk, et al., “Increased IL-1beta, IL-8, and IL-17 mRNA expression in blood mononuclear cells observed in a prospective ischemic stroke study,” Stroke, 30, 2174–2179 (1999).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Newman, “The incidence and nature of neuropsychological morbidity following cardiac surgery,” Perfusion, 4, 93–100 (1989).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Polich, “Meta-analysis of P300 normative sign studies,” Psychophysiology, 33, 1–20 (1996).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Polich, “P300 in clinical applications: meaning, method and measurement,” in: Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Fields, E. Niedermeyer and F. Lopes da Silva (eds.), Baltimore (1993).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Polich and A. Kok, “Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review,” Biol. Psychol., 41, 103–146 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. S. Rasmussen et al., “Do blood levels of neuron-specific enolase and S-100 protein reflect cognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass?” Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand., 43, 495–500 (1999).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. J. Shaw et al., “The incidence and nature of neurological morbidity following cardiac surgery: a review,” Perfusion, 4, 83–91 (1989).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. J. Shaw: “The neurological sequelae of cardiopulmonary bypass: The Newcastle experience,” in: Cardiac Surgery and the Brain, London (1993), pp. 24–33.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. R. J. Swanwick, M. Rowan, R. F. Coen, et al., “Clinical applications of electrophysiological markers in the differential diagnosis of depression and very mild Alzheimer's disease,” J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr., 60, 82–86 (1996).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. M. Taylor, “Cardiac surgery and the brain: an introduction,” in: Cardiac Surgery and the Brain, London (1993), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    I. Toner et al., “Cerebral functional changes following cardiac surgery: neuropsychological and EEG assessment,” Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., 13, 13–20 (1998).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. I. Buziashvili
    • 1
  • Yu. A. Aleksakhina
    • 1
  • S. G. Ambat'ello
    • 1
  • S. T. Matskeplishvili
    • 1
  1. 1.A. N. Bakulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular SurgeryRussian Academy of Medical SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations