Advertisement

Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 35, Issue 8, pp 781–787 | Cite as

Ephaptic Feedback in Identified Synapses in Mollusk Neurons

  • N. I. Bravarenko
  • A. Yu. Malyshev
  • L. L. Voronin
  • P. M. Balaban
Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

The possible existence of intrasynaptic ephaptic feedback in the invertebrate CNS was studied. Intracellular recordings were made of excitatory postsynaptic potentials and currents arising on activation of the recently described monosynaptic connection between identified neurons in the snail CNS. In the presence of ephaptic feedback, tetanization of the postsynaptic neuron with hyperpolarizing impulses should activate presynaptic calcium channels, thus increasing the amplitude of excitatory postsynaptic potential, while sufficiently strong postsynaptic hyperpolarization applied during generation of the excitatory postsynaptic current should induce “supralinear” increases in its amplitude, as has been observed previously in rat hippocampal neurons. The first series of experiments involved delivery of 10 trains of hyperpolarizing postsynaptic impulses (40–50 mV, duration 0.5 sec, frequency 1 Hz, train duration 45 sec); significant changes in the amplitude of excitatory postsynaptic were not seen. In the second series of experiments, changes in the amplitude of the excitatory postsynaptic current were studied during hyperpolarization of the postsynaptic neuron. At a potential of −100 mV, the amplitude of the excitatory postsynaptic current increased significantly more than predicted by its “classical” linear relationship with membrane potential. This “supralinear” increase in the amplitude of the excitatory postsynaptic potential can be explained by the operation of ephaptic feedback and is the first evidence for this phenomenon in CNS synapses of invertebrates.

Key Words

ephaptic feedback monosynaptic connection identified neurons common snail 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    P. M. Balaban, N. I. Bravarenko, L. L. Voronin, and P. V. Gusev, “Long-term potentiation in the central nervous system of the snail after intracellular tetanization,” Dokl. Ros. Akad. Nauk., 343, No.4, 563–566 (1996).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. L. Voronin, “Intrasynaptic ephaptic feedback in central synapses,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 85, No.6, 729–742 (1999).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. L. Voronin, M. A. Volgushev, M. V. Sokolov, A. S. Kas’yanov, and M. V. Chistyakova, “The effects of postsynaptic hyperpolarization support the existence of intrasynaptic ephaptic feedback in central synapses,” Dokl. Ros. Akad. Nauk., 369, No.1, 126–129 (1999).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. V. Kul’chitskii, V. V. Maksimov, P. V. Maksimov, M. S. Lemak, and L. L. Voronin, “Correlation between paired responses supports the existence of positive ephaptic feedback in central synapses,” Dokl. Ros. Akad. Nauk., 389, No.1, 1–3 (2003).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Berretta, A. V. Rossokhin, E. Cherubini, A. V. Astrelin, and L. L. Voronin, “Long-term synaptic changes induced by intracellular tetanization of CA3 pyramidal neurones in hippocampal slices from juvenile rats,” Neurosci., 93, 469–477 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Berretta, A. V. Rossokhin, A. M. Kasyanov, M. V. Sokolov, E. Cherubini, and L. L. Voronin, “Postsynaptic hyperpolarization increases the strength of AMPA mediated synaptic transmission at large synapses between mossy fibres and CA3 pyramidal cells,” Neuropharmacology, 39, 2288–2301 (2000).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. V. P. Bliss and G. Collingridge, “A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus,” Nature, 361, 31–39 (1993).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. J. Bravarenko, P. V. Gusev, P. M. Balaban, and L. L. Voronin, “Postsynaptic induction of long-term synaptic facilitation in snail central neurons,” Neuroreport, 6, No.8, 1182–1186 (1995).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. L. Byzov and T. M. Shura-Bura, “Electrical feedback mechanism in the processing of signals in the outer plexiform layer of the retina,” Vision. Res., 26, 33–34 (1986).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. S. Chesnoy-Marchais, “Characterization of chloride conductance activated by hyperpolarization in Aplysia neurones,” J. Physiol. (London), 342, 277–308 (1983).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. M. Kasyanov, V. V. Maximov, A. L. Byzov, et al., “Intrasynaptic ephaptic feedback alters amplitude-voltage relations of mossy fibre responses in rat CA3 hippocampal neurones,” Neurosci., 101, No.2, 323–336 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    U. Kuhnt, A. M. Kleschevnikov, and L. L. Voronin, “Long-term enhancement of synaptic transmission in the hippocampus after tetanization of single neurones by intracellular current pulses,” Neurosci. Res. Commun., 14, 115–123 (1994).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Y. Malyshev and P. M. Balaban, “Identification of mechanoafferent neurons in terrestrial snail: response properties and synaptic connections,” J. Neurophysiol., 87, No.5, 2364–2371 (2002).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Malyshev, N. Bravarenko, and P. Balaban, “Dependence of synaptic facilitation postsynaptically induced in snail neurons on season and serotonin level,” Neuroreport, 8, No.5, 1179–1182 (1997).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. V. Maximov and A. L. Byzov, “Horizontal cell dynamics: what are the main factors?” Vision Res., 36, 4077–4087 (1996).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. Spruston and D. Johnston, “Perforated patch-clamp analysis of the passive membrane properties of three classes of hippocampal neurons,” J. Neurophysiol., 67, No.3, 508–529 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. Spruston, D. Jaffe, and D. Johnston, “Dendritic attenuation of synaptic potentials and currents: the role of passive membrane properties,” Trends Neurosci., 17, 161–166 (1994).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Volgushev, L. L. Voronin, M. Chistiakova, and W. Singer, “Induction of LTP and LTD in visual cortex neurones by intracellular tetanization,” Neuroreport, 5, 2069–2072 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Volgushev, L. L. Voronin, M, Chistiakova, and W. Singer, “Relations between long-term synaptic modifications and paired-pulse interactions in the rat neocortex,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 9, 751–760 (1997).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    L. L. Voronin, “On the quantal analysis of hippocampal long-term potentiation and related phenomena of synaptic plasticity,” Neurosci., 56, 275–304 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    L. L. Voronin, A. Byzov, A. Kleshevnikov, et al., “Neurophysiological analysis of long-term potentiation in mammalian brain,” Behav. Brain Res., 66, 45–52 (1995).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    L. L. Voronin, M. Volgushev, M. Sokolov, et al., “Evidence for an ephaptic feedback in cortical synapses: postsynaptic hyperpolarization alters the number of response failures and quantal content,” Neurosci., 92, No.2, 399–405 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. I. Wilson and R. A. Nicoll, “Endocannabinoid signaling in the brain,” Science, 296, 678–682 (2002).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. I. Bravarenko
    • 1
  • A. Yu. Malyshev
    • 1
  • L. L. Voronin
    • 1
  • P. M. Balaban
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and NeurophysiologyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations