Quantitative inversion of reservoir properties plays a crucial role in the efficient development of tight sandstone reservoirs. Based on the theories of statistical rock physics and extended elastic impedance (EEI), a complete workflow for quantitative prediction of reservoir properties is developed and the key steps thereof are provided here. The square of S-velocity to P-velocity ratio (K), which is consistent with geological setting of a study area, is obtained from statistics of well data, the value of angle \(\chi\) most relevant to lithology and porosity is produced automatically by evaluating correlations of reservoir parameters with EEI, and the formulas that fit EEI with clay volume and with porosity are obtained. Then, angle \(\chi\) is applied to relevant EEI reflection coefficient data from amplitude variation with offset attribute cubes, the EEI related to clay volume and porosity is obtained through model-based constrained inversion on these data cubes, fitting formulas from well analysis are used to convert EEI data cubes to clay volume and porosity data cubes, and finally, the parameters of a tight sandstone reservoir are predicted quantitatively. The prediction results are consistent with production data from existing wells, indicating that the method proposed here is reliable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Abbasi, S. S., Liu, J., Hameed, N., & Ehsan, M. (2018). A modified approach for elastic impedance inversion due to the variation in value of K. Earth Sciences Research Journal,22, 205–213.
Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., & Mavko, G. (2010). Quantitative seismic interpretation: Applying rock physics tools to reduce interpretation risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ba, J., Xu, W., Fu, L., Carcione, J. E. M., & Zhang, L. (2017). Rock anelasticity due to patchy saturation and fabric heterogeneity: A double double-porosity model of wave propagation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,122, 1949–1976.
Ba, J., Zhao, J., Carcione, J. E. M., & Huang, X. (2016). Compressional wave dispersion due to rock matrix stiffening by clay squirt flow. Geophysical Research Letters,43, 6186–6195.
Bachrach, R. (2006). Joint estimation of porosity and saturation using stochastic rock-physics modeling. Geophysics,71, O53–O63.
Bian, C., Wang, H., Yin, P., & Lin, H. (2009). Formation conditions of large-scale gas accumulation in the Xujiahe formation of Guang’an gas field. Natural Gas Industry,29, 19–22.
Chi, X., & Han, D. (2009). Lithology and fluid differentiation using a rock physics template. The Leading Edge,28, 60–65.
Connolly, P. (1999). Elastic impedance. The Leading Edge,18, 438–452.
Dai, J., Yu, C., Huang, S., Gong, D., Wu, W., Fang, C., et al. (2014). Geological and geochemical characteristics of large gas fields in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,41, 1–13.
Grana, D., & Rossa, E. (2010). Probabilistic petrophysical-properties estimation integrating statistical rock physics with seismic inversion. Geophysics,75, O21–O37.
Gupta, S. D., Chatterjee, R., & Farooqui, M. Y. (2012). Rock physics template (RPT) analysis of well logs and seismic data for lithology and fluid classification in Cambay Basin. International Journal of Earth Sciences,101, 1407–1426.
Hermana, M., Lubis, L. A., Ghosh, D. P., & Sum, C. W. (2016). New rock physics template for better hydrocarbon prediction. In Offshore technology conference Asia.
Jiang, Y., Guo, G., Chen, H., Tao, Y., & Liu, H. (2007). Origin of high-quality reservoirs of the second and fourth member sand-stones, Xujiahe Formation, Upper Triassic in the center of Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,14, 18–21.
Jiang, R., Ouyang, Y., Zeng, Q., Huang, J., He, P., & Ba, J. (2017). Application of the Russell fluid factor in tight sandstone gas detection. Natural Gas Industry,37, 76–81.
Jiang, Z., & Qi, Y. (2016). Application of curve reconstruction inversion to lateral prediction of unconventional reservoir. Marine Geology Frontiers,32, 64–70.
Larsen, A. L., Ulvmoen, M., Omre, H., & Buland, A. (2006). Bayesian lithology/fluid prediction and simulation on the basis of a Markov-chain prior model. Geophysics,71, R69–R78.
Li, H., Zhang, J., Cai, S., & Pan, H. (2019). 3D rock physics template for reservoirs with complex pore structure. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,62, 2711–2723.
Liu, B., Li, J., Wei, X., & Zheng, S. (2009). The application of stochastic seismic inversion in reservoir the application of stochastic seismic inversion in reservoir prediction. Progress in Geophysics,24, 581–589.
Mukerji, T., Jørstad, A., Avseth, P., Mavko, G., & Granli, J. R. (2001). Mapping lithofacies and pore-fluid probabilities in a North Sea reservoir: Seismic inversions and statistical rock physics. Geophysics,66, 988–1001.
O Degaard, E., & Avseth, P. (2003). Interpretation of elastic inversion results using rock physics templates. In 65th EAGE conference and exhibition.
Pan, X., Zhang, G., & Cui, Y. (2019). Azimuthal attenuation elastic impedance inversion for fluid and fracture characterization based on modified linear-slip theory. Geofluids,2019, 1–18.
Pranata, G. D., Rosid, M. S., & Martian, D. (2017). Optimization of distribution and characterization of sand reservoir by using extended elastic impedance method in “G” old field. In AIP conference proceedings, 1862. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4991294.
Ross, C. P. (2002). Comparison of popular AVO attributes, AVO inversion, and calibrated AVO predictions. The Leading Edge,21, 244–252.
Russell, B., & Hampson, D. (1991). Comparison of poststack seismic inversion methods.
Shen, C., Mei, L., Xu, Z., & Tang, J. (2007). Architecture and tectonic evolution of composite basin-mountain system in Sichuan basin and its adjacent areas. Geotectonica et Metallogenia,31, 288–299.
Shuey, R. T. (1985). A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations. Geophysics,50, 609–614.
Smith, G. C., & Gidlow, P. M. (1987). Weighted stacking for rock property estimation and detection of gas. Geophysical Prospecting,35, 993–1014.
Song, W., Wang, X., Du, Y., & Fu, J. (2002). Inversion of reservoir parameters by integrative application of seismic attribution and logging data. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,37, 491–494.
Spikes, K., Mukerji, T., Dvorkin, J., & Mavko, G. (2007). Probabilistic seismic inversion based on rock-physics models. Geophysics,72, R87–R97.
Stovas, A., Landrø, M., & Avseth, P. (2006). AVO attribute inversion for finely layered reservoirs. Geophysics,71, C25–C36.
Sun, S., & Peng, S. (2007). Inversion of geostatistics based on simulated annealing algorithm. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,42, 38–43.
Syed, I. A., Seth, K., & Furuya, K. (2015). Volcanic rock characterisation using the concept of Extended Elastic Impedance: A case study from a Middle Jurassic gas reservoir in offshore Western Australia. In ASEG extended abstracts.
Veeken, P. C., & Rauch-Davies, M. (2006). AVO attribute analysis and seismic reservoir characterization. First Break,24, 41–52.
Wan, X., Wang, L., Liu, J., Jian, X., & Chai, W. (2015). Porosity prediction of Mesozoic sandstone and mudstone with overlapped wave impedance: A case study of × block in North Yellow Sea Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,36, 545–549.
Wang, W., Lv, Y., Fu, G., Sun, T., Wang, C., Liu, Z., et al. (2017). New method of using quasi-acoustic inversion for calculating the shale content and its application in evaluation of lateral sealing ability of fault. Progress in Geophysics,32, 737–744.
Whitcombe, D. N., Connolly, P. A., Reagan, R. L., & Redshaw, T. C. (2002). Extended elastic impedance for fluid and lithology prediction. Geophysics,67, 63–67.
Wu, M., Fu, L., & Li, W. (2008). A high-resolution nonlinear inversion method of reservoir parameters and its application to oil/gas exploration. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,51, 546–557.
Wu, F., Li, Y., Wang, D., Chen, H., & Yao, M. (2011a). Application of AVO attribute to the detection of tight sandstone reservoirs. Natural Gas Industry,31, 55–57.
Wu, D., Li, Y., Wu, Z., Xiong, Y., You, W., & Li, X. (2004). Research on the neural network algorithm of joint inversion of seismic and log data. Natural Gas Industry,24, 55–57.
Wu, Q., Wu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2011b). Reservoir parameter prediction by multi-attribute based on hybrid learning algorithm of feed-forward network. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition),33, 68–72.
Xu, W., Yang, H., & Chen, Z. (2007). Characteristics of the sixth member of Xujiahe formation gas reservoirs in Guang’an area and its development tactics. Natural Gas Industry,27, 19–21.
Yang, H., Wang, D., Zhang, M., Wang, Y., Liu, L., & Zhang, M. (2017). Seismic prediction method of pore fluid in tight gas reservoirs, Ordos Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,44, 544–551.
Yang, H., Yan, Q., Li, M., & Zhang, J. (2005). Predicting reservoir parameters by applying the modified neural network learning method. Natural Gas Industry,25, 37–39.
Yang, X., Zhao, W., Zou, C., Li, W., & Tao, S. (2007). Comparison of formation conditions of “sweet point” reservoirs in Sulige gas field and Xiangxi group gas field in the central Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry,27, 4–7.
Yu, W., Feng, L., & Du, Y. (2019). Application of the wave impedance inversion based on the characteristic curve reconstruction in the complex reservoir prediction. Science Technology and Engineering,19, 58–65.
Yuan, S., Liu, Y., Zhang, Z., Luo, C., & Wang, S. (2019a). Pre-stack stochastic frequency-dependent velocity inversion with rock-physics constraints and statistical associated hydrocarbon attributes. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters,16, 140–144.
Yuan, S., Wang, S., Luo, Y., Wei, W., & Wang, G. (2019b). Impedance inversion by using the low-frequency full-waveform inversion result as an a priori model. Geophysics,84, R149–R164.
Zhang, J., Yin, X., Zhang, G., Gu, Y., & Fan, X. (2020). Prediction method of physical parameters based on linearized rock physics inversion. Petroleum Exploration and Development,47, 59–67.
Zhao, W., Bian, C., & Xu, Z. (2013). Similarities and differences between natural gas accumulations in Sulige gas field in Ordos Basin and Xujiahe gas field in central Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development,40, 400–408.
Zhao, W., & Zhang, G. (2003). Basic features of petroleum geology in the superimposed petroliferous basins of China and their research methodologies. Petroleum Exploration and Development,30, 1–8.
Zhu, G. (2017). Application of acoustic curve reconstruction in reservoir prediction. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration,39, 383–387.
Zou, C., Zhao, Q., Chen, J., Li, J., Yang, Z., Sun, Q., et al. (2018). Natural gas in China: Development trend and strategic forecast. Natural Gas Industry,38, 1–11.
The study was funded by the Chinese National Science and Technology Major Project (Grant Number 2016ZX05047002). I am grateful to PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company for providing the research data and samples.
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, R., Liu, C., Zhang, J. et al. Quantitative Reservoir Characterization of Tight Sandstone Using Extended Elastic Impedance. Nat Resour Res (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-020-09711-6
- Extended elastic impedance
- Tight sandstone
- Quantitative reservoir characterization
- Model-based constrained inversion
- AVO attributes