Advertisement

Natural Resources Research

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 109–123 | Cite as

Mapping Mineralization Probabilities using Multilayer Perceptrons

  • Andrew A. Skabar
Article

Abstract

Mineral-potential mapping is the process of combining a set of input maps, each representing a distinct geo-scientific variable, to produce a single map which ranks areas according to their potential to host mineral deposits of a particular type. The maps are combined using a mapping function that must be either provided by an expert (knowledge-driven approach), or induced from sample data (data-driven approach). Current data-driven approaches using multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) to represent the mapping function have several inherent problems: they are highly sensitive to the selection of training data; they do not utilize the contextual information provided by nondeposit data; and there is no objective interpretation of the values output by the MLP. This paper presents a new approach by which MLPs can be trained to output values that can be interpreted strictly as representing posterior probabilities. Other advantages of the approach are that it utilizes all data in the construction of the model, and thus eliminates any dependence on a particular selection of training data. The technique is applied to mapping gold mineralization potential in the Castlemaine region of Victoria, Australia, and results are compared with a method based on estimating probability density functions.

Keywords

Mineral exploration mineral-potential mapping neural networks 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baum, E. B., and Wilczek, F., 1988, Supervised learning of probability distributions by neural networks, in Anderson, D. Z., ed., Neural Information Processing Systems: Am. Ins. Physics, New York, p. 52–61.Google Scholar
  2. Bishop, C. M., 1995, Neural networks for pattern recognition: Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 482 p.Google Scholar
  3. Bonham-Carter, G. F., 1994, Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modeling with GIS: Pergamom Press, Oxford, 398 p.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, W. M., Gedeon, T. D., and Groves, D. I., 2003, Use of noise to augment training data: a neural network method of mineral–potential mapping in regions of limited known deposit examples: Natural Resources Research, v. 12, no. 2, p. 141–152.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, W. M., Gedeon, T. D., Groves, D. I., and Barnes, R. G., 2000, Artificial neural networks: a new method for mineral prospectivity mapping: Jour. Australian Earth Sciences, v. 47, no. 4, p. 757–770.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, I., and Cook, B., eds., 1988, Victorian geology excursion guide: Australian Acad. Science, Canberra, Australia, 489 p.Google Scholar
  7. Cochrane, G. W., Quick, G., and Spencer-Jones, D., eds., 1995, Introducing Victorian geology (2nd edn,): Geol. Soc. Australia Incorporated (Victorian Division), Melbourne, Australia, 304 p.Google Scholar
  8. Cybenko, G., 1989, Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function: Math. Control, Signals, and Systems, v. 2, p. 303–314.Google Scholar
  9. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B., 1977, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm: Jour. Roy. Statist. Soc. Series B, v. 39, p. 1–38.Google Scholar
  10. Duda, R. O., and Hart, P. E., 1973, Pattern recognition and scene analysis: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 482 p.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, D., and Pan, G., 1999, Mineral favorability mapping: a comparison of artificial neural networks, logistic regression, and discriminant analysis: Natural Resources Research, v. 8, no. 2, p. 93–109.Google Scholar
  12. Harris, D., Zurcher, L, Stanley, M., Marlow, J., and Pan, G., 2003, A comparative analysis of favorability mappings by weights of evidence, probabilistic neural networks, discriminant analysis, and logistic regression: Natural Resources Research, v. 12, no. 4, p. 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hopfield, J. J., 1987, Learning algorithms and probability distributions in feed-forward and feed-back networks: Proc. Nat. Acad. Sciences, v. 84, p. 8428–8433.Google Scholar
  14. Hornick, K., Stinchcombe, M., and White, H., 1989, Multilayer feed-forward networks are universal approximators: Neural Networks, v. 2, no. 5, p. 359–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Møller, M., 1993, A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning: Neural Networks, v. 6, no. 4, p. 523–533.Google Scholar
  16. Parzen, E., 1962, On estimation of a probability density function and mode: Ann. Math. Statistics, v. 33, no. 3, p. 1065–1076.Google Scholar
  17. Porwal, A., Carranza, E. J., and Hale, M. 2003, Artificial neural networks for mineral-potential mapping: a case study from the Aravalli Provence’ Western India: Natural Resources Research, v. 12, no. 3, p 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rumelhart, D. E., and McClelland, J. L., 1986, Parallel distributed processing: exploration in the microstructure of cognition (Vols. 1 & 2), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 611 p. and 547 p.Google Scholar
  19. Schumacher, M., Rossner, R., and Vach, W., 1996, Neural networks and logistic regression: part 1 & 2: Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, v. 21, p. 661–701.Google Scholar
  20. Singer, D. A., and Kouda, R., 1996, Application of a feed-forward neural network in the search for Kuroko deposits in the Hokoruko District, Japan: Math. Geology, v. 28, no. 8, p. 1017–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Singer, D. A., and Kouda, R., 1997, Classification of mineral deposits into types using mineralogy with a probabilistic neural network: Nonrenewable Resources, v. 6, no. 1, p. 27–32.Google Scholar
  22. Singer, D. A., and Kouda, R., 1999, A comparison of the weights-of-evidence method and probabilistic neural networks: Natural Resources Research, v. 8, no., 4, p. 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Skabar, A., 2000, Inductive learning techniques for mineral potential mapping: unpubl. docforal dissertation, School Electrical and Electronic Systems Engineering, Queensland Univ. Technology, Australia, 225 p.Google Scholar
  24. Specht, D. F., 1990, Probabilistic neural networks: Neural Networks, v. 3, no. 1, p. 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Titterington, D. M., Smith, A. F. M., and Makov, U. E., 1985, Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 243 p.Google Scholar
  26. Willman, C. E. 1995, Castlemaine Goldfield: Castlemaine-Chewton, Fryers Creek 1:10 000 Maps: Victoria Energy and Minerals, Geol. Survey Rept. 106.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Computer EngineeringLa Trobe UniversityVictoriaAustralia

Personalised recommendations