Antibacterial effects of chitosan–tripolyphosphate nanoparticles: impact of particle size molecular weight
- 532 Downloads
This study revealed not only the antibacterial potential of smaller chitosan–tripolyphosphate nanoparticles (CS–TPP NPs) over larger ones, but also the attempt has been made to demonstrate antibacterial mechanism of action of CS–TPP NPs on the bacterial cell membrane. Several aspects of low-molecular-weight (LMW) and high-molecular-weight (HMW) CS–TPP NPs were evaluated by their interactions with selected Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The interaction of CS–TPP NPs with synthetic phospholipid membranes was also evaluated using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The permeabilities of the bacterial outer and inner membranes were evaluated by determining the uptake of a fluorescent probe, 1-N-phenylnaphthylamine, and the release of cytoplasmic β-galactosidase. The morphology of the bacteria treated with LMW and HMW CS–TPP NPs was investigated using transmission electron microscopy. Flow cytometric analysis was also performed for the quantification of dead and surviving bacteria. These studies indicated that the antibacterial effects of LMW CS–TPP NPs (196 and 394 nm) were superior to those HMW CS–TPP NPs (598 and 872 nm). These data indicated that the antibacterial activity of CS–TPP NPs was negatively correlated with particle size and molecular weight, and that CS–TPP NPs represent a promising antimicrobial adjunct.
KeywordsChitosan Nanoparticles Particle size Molecular weight Antibacterial
This work was supported and funded by a grant (02-01-02-SF0737) from the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), Malaysia and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
- Chung YC, Su YP, Chen CC, Jia G, Wang HL, Wu JC, Lin JC (2004) Relationship between antibacterial activity of chitosan and surface characteristic of cell wall. Acta Phrmacol Sinc 27:932–936Google Scholar
- Feldhaus M, Siegel R (2004) Flow cytometric screening of yeast surface display libraries. Methods Mol Biol 263:311–332Google Scholar
- Ing LY, Zin NM, Sarwar A, Katas H (2012) Antifungal activity of chitosan nanoparticles and correlation with their physical properties. Int J Biomater 1–9. doi: 10.1155/2012/632698
- Li JE, Wu WL, Wang ZY, Sun GL (2002) Apoptotic effect of As2S2 on K562 cells and its mechanism. Acta Pharmacol Sin 23:991–996Google Scholar
- Li XF, Feng XQ, Yang S, Fu GQ, Wang TP, Su ZX (2010) Chitosan kills Escherichia coli through damage to be of cell membrane mechanism. Carbohydr Polym 79:439–499Google Scholar
- Mohanraj VJ, Chen Y (2006) Nanoparticles—a review. Trop J Pharm Res 5:561–573Google Scholar
- Raja MAG, Katas H, Hamid ZA, Razali NA (2013) Physicochemical properties and in vitro cytotoxicity studies of chitosan as a potential carrier for dicer-substrate siRNA. J Nanomater 1–10. doi: 10.1155/2013/653892
- Shiloh MU, Ruan J, Nathan C (1997) Evaluation of bacterial survival and phagocyte function with a fluorescence-based microplate assay. Infect Immun 65(8):3193–3198Google Scholar