The estimation of nanoparticle agglomerates’ size in fluidized beds remains an open challenge, mainly due to the difficulty of characterizing the inter-agglomerate van der Waals force. The current approach is to describe micron-sized nanoparticle agglomerates as micron-sized particles with 0.1–0.2-μm asperities. This simplification does not capture the influence of the particle size on the van der Waals attraction between agglomerates. In this paper, we propose a new description where the agglomerates are micron-sized particles with nanoparticles on the surface, acting as asperities. As opposed to previous models, here the van der Waals force between agglomerates decreases with an increase in the particle size. We have also included an additional force due to the hydrogen bond formation between the surfaces of hydrophilic and dry nanoparticles. The average size of the fluidized agglomerates has been estimated equating the attractive force obtained from this method to the weight of the individual agglomerates. The results have been compared to 54 experimental values, most of them collected from the literature. Our model approximates without a systematic error the size of most of the nanopowders, both in conventional and centrifugal fluidized beds, outperforming current models. Although simple, the model is able to capture the influence of the nanoparticle size, particle density, and Hamaker coefficient on the inter-agglomerate forces.
Van der Waals Hydrogen bond Fluidization Aggregates Interaction Nanoparticle processing Modeling and simulation
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/ 2007–2013) / ERC Grant, Agreement no 279632.
Ackler HD, French RH, Chiang YM (1996) Comparisons of hamaker constants for ceramic systems with intervening vacuum or water: from force laws and physical properties. J Colloid Interface Sci 179(2):460–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellanos A (2005) The relationship between attractive interparticle forces and bulk behaviour in dry and uncharged fine powders. Adv Phys 54(4):263–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellanos A, Valverde JM, Quintanilla MAS (2001) Aggregation and sedimentation in gas-fluidized beds of cohesive powders. Phys Rev E 64:041,304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaouki J, Chavarie C, Klvana D, Pajonk G (1985) Effect of interparticle forces on the hydrodynamic behaviour of fluidized aerogels. Powder Technol 43(2):117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Martín L, Bouwman WG, van Ommen JR (2012) Two-level hierarchical structure in nano-powder agglomerates in gas media. In: Bulleting of the Americal Physical Society, vol 57Google Scholar
Espin MJ, Valverde JM, Quintanilla MAS, Castellanos A (2009) Electromechanics of fluidized beds of nanoparticles. Phys Rev E 79:011,304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth AJ, Rhodes MJ (2000) A simple model incorporating the effects of deformation and asperities into the van der waals force for macroscopic spherical solid particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 223(1):133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French RH, Cannon RM, DeNoyer LK, Chiang YM (1994) Full spectral calculation of non-retarded hamaker constants for ceramic systems from interband transition strengths. Solid State Ion 75:13–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedlander SK (2000) Smoke, dust, and haze: fundamentals of aerosol dynamics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
Shabanian J, Jafari R, Chaouki J (2012) Fluidization of ultrafine powders. Int Rev Chem Eng 4(1):16–50Google Scholar
Tahmasebpoor M, de Martín L, Talebi M, Mostoufi N, van Ommen JR (2013) The role of the hydrogen bond in dense nanoparticle-gas suspensions. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:5788–5793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valverde JM, Castellanos A (2006) Fluidization of nanoparticles: a modified Richardson–Zaki law. AIChE J 52(2):838–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valverde JM, Castellanos A (2008a) Fluidization of nanoparticles: A simple equation for estimating the size of agglomerates. Chem Eng J 140(13):296–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valverde JM, Castellanos A (2008b) A modified Richardson–Zaki equation for fluidization of geldart B magnetic particles. Powder Technol 181(3):347–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Ommen JR, Valverde JM, Pfeffer R (2012) Fluidization of nanopowders: a review. J Nanopart Res 14(3):737–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang XS, Palero V, Soria J, Rhodes MJ (2006a) Laser-based planar imaging of nano-particle fluidization: Part I. Determination of aggregate size and shape. Chem Eng Sci 61(16):5476–5486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang XS, Palero V, Soria J, Rhodes MJ (2006b) Laser-based planar imaging of nano-particle fluidization: Part II. Mechanistic analysis of nanoparticle aggregation. Chem Eng Sci 61(24):8040–8049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu MK, Friedlander SK (1993) Note on the power law equation for fractal-like aerosol agglomerates. J Colloid Interface Sci 159(1):246–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao W, Guangsheng G, Fei W, Jun W (2002) Fluidization and agglomerate structure of SiO2 nanoparticles. Powder Technol 124(12):152–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou L, Zhang F, Zhou T, Kage H, Mawatari Y (2013) A model for estimating agglomerate sizes of non-magnetic nanoparticles in magnetic fluidized beds. Korean J Chem Eng 30(2):501–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar