Journal of Nanoparticle Research

, Volume 12, Issue 8, pp 2907–2917 | Cite as

Quenching of porous silicon photoluminescence by molecular oxygen and dependence of this phenomenon on storing media and method of preparation of pSi photosensitizer

  • María Balaguer
  • Eugenia Matveeva
Research Paper


The quenching of porous silicon photoluminescence (pSi PL) by molecular oxygen has been studied in different storing media in an attempt to clarify the mechanism of the energy transfer from the silicon photosensitizer to the oxygen acceptor. Luminescent materials have been prepared by two methods: electrochemical anodizing and chemical etching. Different structural forms were used: porous layers on silicon wafer and two kinds of differently prepared powder. Dry air and liquid water were employed as storing media; quenching behaviour was under observation until total degradation of quenching properties. Singlet oxygen molecules generation through energy transfer from photoluminescent pSi was the only photosensitizing mechanism observed under dry gas conditions. This PL quenching process was preferentially developed at 760 nm (1.63 eV) that corresponds to the formation of the 1Σ singlet oxygen state. Oxidation of the pSi photosensitizer was the main factor that led to its total deactivation in a time scale of few weeks. Regarding water medium, different photosensitizing behaviour was observed. In watery conditions, two preferred energy levels were found: the one detected in dry gas and another centred at approximately 2.2 eV (550 nm). Formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) different from singlet oxygen, such as superoxide anion or superoxide radical, can be responsible for the second one. This second quenching process developed gradually after the initial contact of pSi photosensitizer with water and then degraded. The process lasted only several hours. Therefore, functionalization of the pSi photosensitizer is probably required to stabilize its PL and quenching properties in the watery physiological conditions required for biomedical applications.


Porous silicon Si nanocrystals Ageing Oxidation Dissolution Photoluminescence Quenching Energy transfer Singlet oxygen Reactive oxygen species Sensors 



This work is a part of the project PSY-NANO-Si (NMP4-CT-2004-013875) financed by the European Community and co-financed by Ministry of Education and Science of Spain (MAT2006-27447E) and Valencian Community (ACOMP/2007/209). The authors acknowledge the fruitful discussions with Dr. V. Chirvony and are thankful to Dr. L. Bychto and Dr. E. Pastor for samples preparation.


  1. Balaguer M, Pastor E, Bychto L, Atienzar P, Miranda MA, Matveeva E, Chirvony VS (2008) Durability and photophysical properties of surfactant-covered porous silicon particles in aqueous suspensions. Phys Status Solidi A 205:2585–2588CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Bisi O, Ossicini S, Pavesi L (2000) Porous silicon: a quantum sponge structure for silicon based optoelectronics. Surf Sci Rep 38:1–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolwell GP, Wojtaszek P (1997) Mechanism for the generation of reactive oxygen species in plant defense—a broad perspective. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 51:347–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brezová V, Gabcova S, Dvoranová D, Staško A (2005) Reactive oxygen species produced upon photoexcitation of sunscreens containing titanium dioxide (an EPR study). J Photochem Photobiol B 79:121–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bychto L, Balaguer M, Pastor E, Chirvony V, Matveeva E (2008) Influence of preparation and storage conditions on photoluminescence of porous silicon powder with embedded Si nanocrystals. J Nanopart Res 10:1241–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Canham LT (1990) Silicon quantum wire array fabrication by electrochemical dissolution of wafers. Appl Phys Lett 57:1046–1048CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Canham LT (1995) Bioactive silicon structure fabrication through nanoetching techniques. Adv Mater 7:1033–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chatterjee DK, Fong LS, Zhang Y (2008) Nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy: an emerging paradigm. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:1627–1637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen SY, Huang YH, Lai HK, Li C, Wang JY (2007) Investigation of passivation of porous silicon at room temperature. Solid State Commun 142:358–362CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Chirvony V, Chyrvonaya A, Ovejero J, Matveeva E, Goller B, Kovalev D, Huygens A, Witte Pd (2007) Surfactant-modified hydrophilic nano-structured porous silicon for photosensitized formation of singlet oxygen in water. Adv Mater 19:2967–2972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cullis AG, Canham LT, Calcott PDJ (1997) The structural and luminescence properties of porous silicon. J Appl Phys 82:909–965CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Debarge L, Stoquer JP, Slaoui A, Stalmans L, Poortmans J (1998) Rapid thermal oxidation of porous silicon for surface passivation. Mater Sci Semicon Process 1:281–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Froner E, Adamo R, Gaburro Z, Margesin B, Pavesi L, Rigo A, Scarpa M (2006) Luminescence of porous silicon derived nanocrystals dispersed in water: dependence on initial porous silicon oxidation. J Nanopart Res 8:1071–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fujii M, Usui M, Hayashi S, Gross E, Kovalev D, Künzner N, Diener J, Timoshenko VY (2005) Singlet oxygen formation by porous Si in solution. Phys Status Solidi A 202:1385–1389CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerdes R, Wöhrle D, Spiller W, Schneider G, Schnurpfeil G, Schulz-Ekloff G (1997) Photooxidation of phenol and monochlorophenols in oxygen-saturated aqueous solutions by different photosensitizers. J Photochem Photobiol A 111:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giovannozzi AM, Rocchia M (2008) Effect of the reaction time, reagent concentration and sample thickness on the thermal derivatisation of p+ porous silicon with α-undecene and ω-carboxy alkenes: a FTIR investigation. Sens Actuators B 130:795–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Girotti AW (2001) Photosensitized oxidation of membrane lipids: reaction pathways, cytotoxic effects, and cytoprotective mechanisms. J Photochem Photobiol B 63:103–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hory MA, Hkrino R, Ligeon M, Muller F, Gaspard F, Mihalcescu I, Vial JC (1995) Fourier transform IR monitoring of porous silicon passivation during post-treatments such as anodic oxidation and contact with organic solvents. Thin Solid Films 255:200–203CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Hotze EM, Labille J, Alvarez P, Wiesner MR (2008) mechanism of photochemistry and reactive oxygen production by fullerene suspension in water. Environ Sci Technol 42:4175–4180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Katona Z, Grofcsik A, Baranyai P, Bitter I, Grabner G, Kubinyi M, Vidóczy T (1998) Triplet state spectroscopic studies on some 5, 10, 15, 20-tetrakis(methoxyphenyl)porphyrins. J Mol Struct 450:41–45CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Sakka S, Kitsigi T, Yamamuro T (1990) Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W. J Biomed Mater Res 24:721–734CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kovalev D, Fujii M (2005) Silicon nanocrystals: photosensitizers for oxygen molecules. Adv Mater 17:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kovalev D, Gross E, Künzner N, Koch F, Timoshenko VY, Fujii M (2002) Resonant electronic energy transfer from excitons confined in silicon nanocrystals to oxygen molecules. Phys Rev Lett 89:137401–137404CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mártire DO, Ganzalez MC (2000) Electron transfer reaction of singlet molecular oxygen with phenols. J Phys Org Chem 13:208–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matysik J, Alia A, Bhalu B, Mohanty P (2002) Molecular mechanism of quenching of reactive oxygen species by proline under stress in plants. Curr Sci 82:525–532Google Scholar
  26. Nagano T, Arakane K, Ryu A, Masunaga T, Shinmoto K, Mashiko S, Hirobe M (1994) Comparison of singlet oxygen production efficiency of C60 with other photosensitizers, based on 1268 nm emission. Chem Pharm Bull 42:2291–2294Google Scholar
  27. Nahidi M, Kolasinski KW (2006) Effect of stain etchant composition on the photoluminescence and morphology of porous silicon. J Electrochem Soc 153:C19–C26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ogata YH, Tsuboi T, Sakka T, Naito S (2000) Oxidation of porous silicon in dry and wet environments under mild temperature conditions. J Porous Mater 7:63–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pastor E, Balaguer M, Bychto L, Salonen J, Lehto VP, Matveeva E, Chirvony V (2008) Porous silicon for photosensitized formation of singlet oxygen in water and in simulated body fluid: two methods of modification by undecylenic acid. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 8:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prestidge CA, Barnes TJ, Lau CH, Barnett C, Loni A, Canham L (2007) Mesoporous silicon: a platform for delivery of therapeutics. Exp Opin Drug Deliv 4:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Salonen J, Lehto VP (2008) Fabrication and chemical surface modification of mesoporous silicon for biomedical applications. Chem Eng J 137:162–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Salonen J, Lehto VP, Laine E (1997) The room temperature oxidation of porous silicon. Appl Surf Sci 120:191–198CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  33. Stewart MP, Robins EG, Geders TW, Allen MJ, Choi HC, Buriak JM (2000) Three methods for stabilization and functionalization of porous silicon surfaces via hydrosilylation and electrografting reactions. Phys Status Solidi A 182:109–115CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. Torres-Costa V, Salonen J, Lehto VP, Martín-Palma RJ, Martínez-Duart JM (2008) Passivation of nanostructured silicon optical devices by thermal carbonization. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 111:636–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vázsonyi É, Szilágyi E, Petrik P, Horváth ZE, Lohner T, Fried M, Jalsovszky G (2001) Porous silicon formation by stain etching. Thin Solid Films 388:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wolkin MV, Jorne J, Fauchet PM, Allan G, Delerue C (1999) Electronic states and luminescence in porous silicon quantum dots: the role of oxygen. Phys Rev Lett 82:197–200CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanophotonics Technology CenterTechnical University of ValenciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.EM-Silicon Nano-Technologies, S.L.PaternaSpain
  3. 3.Instituto de Tecnología Química (UPV-CSIC)ValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations