Abstract
Nanotechnology will be an increasing part of the everyday lives of most people in the world. There is a general recognition that few people understand the implications of the technology, the technology itself or even the definition of the word. This lack of understanding stems from a lack of knowledge about science in general but more specifically difficulty in grasping the size scale and symbolism of nanotechnology. A potential key to informing the general public is establishing the ability to comprehend the scale of nanotechnology. Transitioning from the macro to the nanoscale seems to require an ability to comprehend scales of one-billion. Scaling is a skill not common in most individuals and tests of their ability to extrapolate size based upon scaling a common object demonstrates that most individuals cannot scale to the extent needed to make the transition to nanoscale. Symbolism is another important vehicle to providing the general public with a basis to understand the concepts of nanotechnology. With increasing age, individuals are able to draw representations of atomic scale objects, but these tend to be iconic and the different representations not easily translated. Ball and stick models are most recognized by the public, which provides an opportunity to present not only useful symbolism but also a reference point for the atomic scale.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous (2003) Nanotechnology faces GM-style backlash. IEE Rev 49(3)
Bainbridge W (2002) Public attitudes toward nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 4:561–570
Beer V (1987) Great expectations: Do museums know what visitors are doing? Curator 30(3):206–215
Booth JL, Siegler RS (2006) Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. Dev Psych 41(6):189–201
Cobb M, Macoubrie J (2004) Public perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits and trust. J Nanopart Res 6:395–405
Cohen DJ, Ferrell JM et al (2002) What very small numbers mean. J Exp Psych 131(3):424–442
Crommie MF, Lutz CP et al (1993) Confinement of electrons to quantum corrals on a metal surface. Science 262(5131):218–220
DeLoache JS, Kolstad V et al (1991) Physical similarity and young children’s understanding of scale models. Child Dev 62:111–126
DeLoache JS, Uttal DH et al (2004) Scale errors offer evidence for a perception-action dissociation early in life. Science 304:1027–1029
DeVellis RF (2003). Scale development: theory and applications. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Dowling A (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. Available http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm
Ferk V, Vrtacnik M et al (2003) Students’ understanding of molecular structure representations. In J Sci Educ 25(10):1227–1245
Friedman SM, Egold BP (2005) Nanotechnology: risks and the media. IEEE Tech Soc Magazine 24(4):5–11
Harrison AG, Treagust DF (2000) Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: a case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Sci Edu 84(3):352–381
Kesidou S, Roseman JE (2003) Projecte 201 analyses of middle-school science textbooks: a response to holliday. J Res Sci Teach 40(5):535–543
Kjolberg K, Wickson F (2007) Social and ethical interactions with nano: mapping the early literature. NanoEthics 1:89–104
Knight H, Pierce J (2003) To kill a technology. The Engineer 291:24–29
Kozma R, Russell J (1997) Multimedia and understanding: expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. J Res Sci Teach 34(9):949–968
Krajcik J, Stevens S et al (2007) Big Ideas in Nanoscience. Retrieved November 26, Available http://www.nanoed.org/news/docs/011207/JoeKrajcik-NSF_Nano_Big_IDEA.pdf
Laszlo P (2000) Playing with molecular models. Int J Phil Chem 6(1):85–97
Mills K, Fledderman C (2005) Getting the best from nanotechnology: approaching social and ethical implications openly and proactively. IEEE Tech Soc Magazine 24(4):18–26
Morrissey SR (2004) Harnessing nanotechnology. Chem Eng News 82(16):30–33
Parr D (2005) Will nanotechnology make the world a better place? Trends Biotechnol 23(8):395–398
Pasachoff JM (2003) What should students learn? Stellar magnitudes. Astro Educ Rev 2(2):162–165
Robinson WR (2000) Learning about atoms, molecules and chemical bonds: a case study of multiple-model use. J Chem Educ 77(9):1110–1111
Roco MC (2003a) Broader Societal Issues of Nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 5(3–4):181–189
Roco MC (2003b) Public affairs forum—national nanotechnology initiative to advance broad societal goals. MRS Bull 28(6):416
Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2005) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: maximizing human benefit. J Nanopart Res 7(1):1–13
Rodriguez MA, Niaz M (2004) A Reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for general physics textbooks: a history and philosophy of science perspective. J Sci Educ Tech 13(3):409–424
Scheufele DA, Lewenstein BV (2005) The public and nanotechnology: how citizens make sense of emerging technologies. J Nanopart Res 7:659–667
Schulz WG (2004) Nanotechnology under the scope. Chem Eng News 82(10):23–24
Selin C (2007) Expectations and the emergence of nanotechnology. Sci Tech Human Values 32(2):196–200
Service RF (2004) Nanotech forum aims to head off replay of past blunders. Science 306(5698):955
Thurs DP (2007) Tiny tech, transcendent tech. Sci Commun 29(1):65–95
Toumey C (2007) Cubism at the nanoscale. Nature Nanotech 2:587–589
Waldron AM, Spencer D et al (2006) The current state of pubic understanding of nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 8:569–575
Wilkinson C, Allan S et al (2007) From uncertainty to risk?: scientific and news media portrayals of nanopart safety. Health Risk Soc 9(2):145–157
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by that National Science Foundation. The author thanks Anna Waldron for her help in conducting these studies and Natalie Broadwater for data analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Batt, C.A., Waldron, A.M. & Broadwater, N. Numbers, scale and symbols: the public understanding of nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 10, 1141–1148 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-007-9344-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-007-9344-1