Journal of Nanoparticle Research

, Volume 8, Issue 3–4, pp 445–453 | Cite as

Catalytic behavior of nickel nanoparticles: gasborne vs. supported state

  • Alfred P. Weber
  • Parisa Davoodi
  • Martin Seipenbusch
  • Gerhard Kasper


To study the pure catalytic activity of metallic nanoparticles, the formation of methane on gasborne Ni nanoparticles, so called aerosol catalysis experiments, were performed. Beside effects typical for the methanation such as poisoning of the particle surface at temperatures above 385°C, the maximum of the catalytic activity was observed for Ni particles of about 14 nm, i.e. in a size range, which is quite uncommon for typical nanoeffects of metallic particles. To clarify, which catalytic phenomena are related to the aerosol state, the same reaction was performed on supported Ni nanoparticles, which were also generated and conditioned in the gas phase and deposited on a SiO2 surface by thermophoresis. For these supported particles, the same reaction conditions were established as before for the gasborne Ni nanoparticles. However, differences in the mass transport characteristics of educt and product molecules to the particles were encountered and led to lower overall reaction rates. While qualitatively poisoning kinetics and activation energies agreed for both cases, significant differences were observed for the size dependence of the catalytic activity and for the sintering kinetics. The observed shift of the optimum size for the methanation from 14 nm (aerosol) to 25 nm (on support) can be explained by different adsorption enthalpies of the educt gases on aerosol and supported Ni nanoparticles, respectively.


aerosol catalysis supported nanoparticles adsorption effects methanation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The support of this work by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) is greatly appreciated.


  1. Bhatia S., Bakhshi N.N., Mathews J.F. (1978). Characterization and methanation activity of supported Nickel catalysts. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 56: 575–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eischens R.P., Francis S.A., Pliskin W.A. (1956). The effect of surface coverage on the spectra of chemisorbed CO. Adv. Catal. 60: 194–201Google Scholar
  3. Glikin M.A. (1996). Aerosol catalysis. Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering 30: 390–394Google Scholar
  4. Goodman D.W., Kelley R.D., Madey T.E., Yates J.T., Jr. (1980). Kinetics of the hydrogenation of CO over a single crystal nickel catalyst. J. Catal. 63: 226–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hilger A.,Cüppers N., Tenfelde M.,Kreibig U. (2000). Surface and interface effects in the optical properties of silver nanoparticles. European Physical Journal D - Atoms Molecules Clusters and Optical Physics 10(1): 115–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hippe C., Lamber R., Schulz-Ekloff G., Schubert U.(1997). Influence of the strong metal-support interaction on the CO chemisorption at a Pt/SiO2 catalyst. Catal. Lett. 43: 195–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kauffeldt, E. & Th. Kauffeldt, 2004. A new concept to perform gas phase processing using an in-situ formed quasi steady state high active catalytic surface on a nanometer scale. Proceedings of the conference on ‘Nanoparticles from the Vapor Phase Synthesis with Chemical and Biochemical Applications’, 8–13 August, Davos, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  8. Levdanskii V. (2002). Dependence of the condensation (sticking) coefficient on the radius of small aerosol particles. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics 75(4): 792–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. O’Neill C.E.,Yates D.J.C. (1961). The effect of the support on the infrared spectra of carbon monoxide adsorbed on Nickel. J. Phys. Chem. 65: 901–906Google Scholar
  10. Polizzotti R.S.,Schwarz J.A. (1982). Hydrogenation of CO to methane: Kinetic studies on polycrystalline nickel foils. J. Catal. 77: 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Seipenbusch M.,Weber A.P., Schiel A., Kasper G. (2003). Influence of the gas atmosphere on restructuring and sintering kinetics of nickel and platinum aerosol nanoparticle agglomerates. J. Aerosol Sci. 34(12): 1699–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Seipenbusch, M., 2003. Katalytische und photoelektrische Aktivität gasgetragener Nanopartikel-Agglomerate. Ph.D. thesis, University of Karlsruhe, Shaker VerlagGoogle Scholar
  13. Thomas J.M.,Thomas W.J. (1997). Principles and practice of heterogeneous catalysis. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  14. Valden M., Lai X., Goodman D.W. (1998). Onset of catalytic activity of gold clusters on titania with the appearance of nonmetallic properties. Science 281(5383): 1647–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vannice M.A. (1976). The catalytic synthesis of hydrocarbons fron carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 14: 153–191Google Scholar
  16. Weber A.P., Seipenbusch M., Thanner Ch., Kasper G.(1999). Aerosol catalysis on nickel nanoparticles. J. Nanoparticle Res. 1: 253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Weber A.P.,Seipenbusch M.,Kasper G. (2001a). Correlation between catalytic activity and surface state of gasborne Ni nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. Technol. 24 (7): 702–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weber A.P., Seipenbusch M., Kasper G. (2001b). Application of aerosol techniques to study the catalytic formation of methane on gasborne nickel nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. A 105: 8958–8963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wu, N.-L., 2001. Sol-gel synthesis and characterization of metal oxide nanocrystallites. Proceedings 6th WCCE, MelbourneGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfred P. Weber
    • 1
  • Parisa Davoodi
    • 1
  • Martin Seipenbusch
    • 1
  • Gerhard Kasper
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Mechanische Verfahrenstechnik und MechanikUniversität Karlsruhe (TH)KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations