Advertisement

Particle stranding ellipsis involves PF-deletion

  • Yosuke Sato
  • Masako Maeda
Article
  • 122 Downloads

Abstract

This paper develops a new phonological analysis of Particle Stranding Ellipsis (PSE) in Japanese as an alternative to the recent, purely structural analysis of the phenomenon (Sato 2012; Goto 2014). Drawing on Shibata’s (2014) observations, we propose that PSE results from a string-based deletion in the phonological component (see Mukai 2003 and An 2016), which has the function of aligning the left edge of the first Intermediate Phrase to that of the Utterance Phrase. We then turn to investigate the relationship between PSE and other better-studied cases of ellipsis in Japanese. We present various arguments, based on sloppy identity readings, wide scope negation, disjunction, and parallelism, to show that certain cases of PSE may well involve so-called argument ellipsis, one of the most intensively investigated phenomena in the latest generative literature on Japanese syntax (Oku 1998; Saito 2007; Takahashi 2008), arguing against the conceivable pro-drop alternative. The two results derived here strongly suggest that the derivation of PSE involves PF-deletion.

Keywords

Particle stranding ellipsis Phase theory Strict linear sensitivity String deletion Non-constituent deletion Argument ellipsis Japanese 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are most grateful to the NLLT associate editor Jason Merchant and a reviewer for invaluable feedback on an earlier version of this paper. We also thank Jun Abe, Duk-Ho An, Kamil Deen, Yoshi Dobashi, Mitcho Yoshitaka Erlewine, Yoshiki Fujiwara, Nobu Goto, Heidi Harley, Shin-Ichi Kitada, Si Kai Lee, Ted Levin, Hiroki Nomoto, Myung-Kwan Park, Keely New Zuo Qi, Naga Selvanathan, Daiko Takahashi, Kensuke Takita, Hideaki Yamashita and Masataka Yano as well as the audience members at the 19th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar (Seoul National University), at the 25th Japanese/Korean Linguistics Conference (University of Hawaii, Manoa), and at the Syntax/Semantics Reading Group at the Department of English Language and Literature of the National University of Singapore for helpful comments on the ideas presented here and discussions. We also thank Keely (again) for proofreading this paper. This research has been supported by the Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1 (grant #: R-103-000-124-112) awarded to Yosuke Sato as well as by the Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (grant #: 26770170) awarded to Masako Maeda. We blame all errors on the brutal humidity in Singapore. The first author thanks the second author for emailing him intriguing questions regarding PSE on March 11, 2017, which has led to this joint work reported here.

References

  1. Abe, Jun, and Hiroto Hoshi. 1997. Gapping and P-stranding. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6: 101–136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackema, Peter, and Krista Szendröi. 2002. Determiner sharing as an instance of dependent ellipsis. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 3–34. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. An, Duk-Ho. 2016. Extra deletion in fragment answers and its implications. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25: 313–350. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barros, Matthew, Patrick Elliot, and Gary Thoms. 2014. There is no island repair. Ms., Rutgers University, University of College London and University of Edinburgh. Available at http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/002100. Accessed 5 March 2018.
  5. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  6. Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  7. Fujii, Tomohiro. 2016. Hukubun no koozoo to umekomihobun no bunrui [The structure of complementation and the classification of embedded complements]. In Nihongo bunpoo handobukku: Gengoriron to gengokakutoku no kanten kara [The handbook of Japanese grammar: From the perspectives of linguistic theory and language acquisition], eds. Keiko Murasugi, Mamoru Saito, Yoichi Miyamoto, and Kensuke Takita, 2–37. Tokyo: Kaitakusya. Google Scholar
  8. Fukui, Naoki, and Hiromu Sakai. 2003. The visibility guideline for functional categories: Verb raising in Japanese and related issues. Lingua 113: 321–375. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goto, Nobu. 2014. A note on particle stranding ellipsis. In Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar (SICOGG), ed. Bum-Sik Park, Vol. 14, 78–97. Seoul: Hankuk Publishing. Google Scholar
  10. Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  11. Hankamer, Jorge, and Ivan Sag. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–426. Google Scholar
  12. Hattori, Shiro. 1960. Gengogaku no Hoohoo [Methods in linguistics]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten Publishers. Google Scholar
  13. Hoji, Hajime. 1985. Logical form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese. PhD diss., University of Washington. Google Scholar
  14. Hoji, Hajime. 1990. Theories of anaphora and aspects of Japanese syntax. Ms., University of Southern California. Google Scholar
  15. Hoji, Hajime. 1991. KARE. In Interdisciplinary approaches to languages: Essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda, eds. Carol Georgopoulos and Roberta Ishihara, 287–304. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoji, Hajime. 1995. Demonstrative binding and Principle B. In North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 25, ed. Jill Beckman, 255–271. Amherst: GLSA. Google Scholar
  17. Hoji, Hajime. 1998. Null objects and sloppy identity in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 127–152. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hornstein, Norbert, and Amy Weinberg. 1981. Case theory and preposition stranding. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 55–92. Google Scholar
  19. Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil A. 1990. Incomplete VP deletion and gapping. Linguistic Analysis 20: 64–81. Google Scholar
  20. Jun, Sun-Ah. 1993. The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. PhD diss., Ohio State University. Google Scholar
  21. Kim, Jeong-Seok. 1997. Syntactic focus movement and ellipsis: A minimalist approach. PhD diss., University of Connecticut, Storrs. Google Scholar
  22. Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  23. Kuroda, S.-Y. 1965. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. PhD diss., MIT. Google Scholar
  24. Maeda, Masako. 2017. Argument ellipsis and scope economy. Ms., Kyushu Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
  25. Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 661–738. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Merchant, Jason. 2013. Diagnosing ellipsis. In Diagnosing syntax, eds. Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng and Norbert Corver, 537–542. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller, Philip, and Geoffrey Pullum. 2014. Exophoric VP ellipsis. In The core and the periphery: Data-driven perspectives on syntax inspired by Ivan A. Sag, eds. Philip Hofmeister and Elisabeth Norcliffe, 5–32. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Google Scholar
  28. Mukai, Emi. 2003. On verbless conjunction in Japanese. In North East Linguistic Society (NELS), eds. Makoto Kadowaki and Shigeto Kawahara. Vol. 33, 205–224. Amherst: GLSA. Google Scholar
  29. Nagahara, Hiroyuki. 1994. Phonological phrasing in Japanese. PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles. Google Scholar
  30. Nasu, Norio. 2012. Topic particle stranding and the structure of CP. In Main clause phenomena: New horizons, eds. Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman, and Rachel Nye, 205–228. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar
  31. Oku, Satoshi. 1998. A theory of selection and reconstruction in the minimalist perspective. PhD diss., University of Connecticut. Google Scholar
  32. Pierrehumbert, Janet, and Mary Beckman. 1988. Japanese tone structure. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  33. Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar: A handbook of generative syntax, ed. Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rizzi, Luigi. 2005. Phase theory and the privilege of the root. In Organizing grammar: Linguistic studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, eds. Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Cover, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz, and Jan Koster, 529–537. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  35. Saito, Mamoru. 2004. Genitive subjects in Japanese: Implications for the theory of null objects. In Non-nominative subjects, eds. Peri Bhaskarao and Karumuri Venkata Subbarao. Vol. 2, 103–118. Amsterdam: Benjamin. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saito, Mamoru. 2007. Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Language Research 43: 203–227. Google Scholar
  37. Sakamoto, Yuta. 2016. Scope and disjunction feed an even more argument for argument ellipsis in Japanese. In Japanese/Korean linguistics 23, eds. Michael Kenstowicz, Theodore Levin, and Ryo Masuda. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Google Scholar
  38. Sakamoto, Yuta, and Hiroaki Saito. 2017. Overtly stranded but covertly not. Paper presented at the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 35, University of Calgary. Available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxzV2BrxFnu0RFh1NGtuOUI4enM/view. Accessed 5 March 2018.
  39. Sato, Yosuke. 2012. Particle-stranding ellipsis in Japanese, phase theory, and the privilege of the root. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 495–504. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sato, Yosuke, and Jason Ginsburg. 2007. A new type of nominal ellipsis in Japanese. In Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics (FAJL) 4, eds. Yoichi Miyamoto and Masao Ochi, 197–204. Cambridge: MITWPL. Google Scholar
  41. Sato, Yosuke, and Masako Maeda. 2018. Dependent string-deletion in Japanese gapping. Ms., National University of Singapore and Kyushu Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
  42. Selkirk, Elisabeth, and Koichi Tateishi. 1991. Syntax and downstep in Japanese. In Interdisciplinary approaches to language: Essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda, 519–543. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shibata, Yoshiyuki. 2014. A phonological approach to particle stranding ellipsis in Japanese. Poster presented at Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics (FAJL) 7. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics and International Christian University. Google Scholar
  44. Shibata, Yoshiyuki. 2015. Exploring syntax from the interfaces. PhD diss., University of Connecticut, Storrs. Google Scholar
  45. Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1978. Nihongo-no bunseki [Analyses of the Japanese language]. Tokyo: Taishukan. Google Scholar
  46. Sohn, Keun-Won. 1994. On gapping and right node raising. In Explorations in generative grammar: A Festschrift for Dong-Whee Yang, eds. Young-Sun Kim, Byung-Choon Lee, Kyoung-Jae Lee, Yun Kwon Yang, and Jong-Yurl Yoon, 589–611. Seoul: Hankuk Publishing. Google Scholar
  47. Takahashi, Daiko. 2008. Noun phrase ellipsis. In The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics, eds. Shigeru Miyagawa and Mamoru Saito, 394–422. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  48. Takahashi, Daiko. 2012. Looking at argument ellipsis derivationally. Talk presented at the 15th Workshop of the International Research Project on Comparative Syntax and Language Acquisition. Nanzan University. Available at http://www.ad.cyberhome.ne.jp/~d-takahashi/DTSyntaxLab/Research.html. Accessed 5 March 2018.
  49. Takahashi, Daiko. 2013a. A note on parallelism for elliptic arguments. In Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics (FAJL) 6, eds. Kazuko Yatsushiro and Uli Sauerland, 203–213. Cambridge: MITWPL. Google Scholar
  50. Takahashi, Daiko. 2013b. Comparative syntax of argument ellipsis. Paper presented at the NINJAL project Linguistic variation within the confines of the language faculty: A study in Japanese first language acquisition and parametric syntax. Tokyo: NINJAL. Google Scholar
  51. Takahashi, Daiko. 2016. Ko shoryaku [Argument ellipsis]. In Nihongo bunpoo handobukku: Gengoriron to gengokakutoku no kanten kara [The handbook of Japanese grammar: From the perspectives of linguistic theory and language acquisition], eds. Keiko Murasugi, Mamoru Saito, Yoichi Miyamoto, and Kensuke Takita, 228–264. Tokyo: Kaitakusha. Google Scholar
  52. Takita, Kensuke. 2018. Antecedent-contained clausal argument ellipsis. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 27(1): 1–32. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vance, Timothy. 1993. Are Japanese particles clitics? Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 27: 3–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Williams, Edwin. 1997. Blocking and anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 577–628. Google Scholar
  55. Yoshida, Tomoyuki. 2004. Syudai no syooryaku gensho: Hikaku toogoron teki koosatu [The phenomenon of topic ellipsis: A comparative syntactic consideration]. In Nihongo Kyooikugaku no Siten [Perspectives on Japanese language pedagogy], eds. The Editorial Committee of Annals, 291–305. Tokyo: Tokyodo. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Kyushu Institute of TechnologyFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations