Advertisement

Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 711–733 | Cite as

About the primitives of aspect across languages

  • María J. Arche
Article

Abstract

This introduction presents the matter that this Topic/Comment issue addresses—namely, the encoding of aspectual information in the syntax and morphology. The main aim of this issue is to shed light on the identification of the semantic primitives underlying the most prominent viewpoint aspectual forms referred to in the literature (e.g., Imperfect, Perfective, Perfect, and Neutral), and to give a principled explanation of the way in which these semantic primitives are represented in the syntax and mapped onto the morphology. The introduction surveys and compares the different proposals that the authors in the issue defend in this regard and discusses the need of finer grained analyses so that more accurate crosslinguistic correspondences, which are crucial for answering questions in realms such as that of second language acquisition, can be established.

Keywords

Viewpoint Aspect Formal analysis Semantic primitives of Aspect Syntax of Aspect Morphology of Aspect 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I want to express my gratitude to all those who have made this Topic/Comment issue possible. Special thanks go to Hamida Demirdache, Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria, Tim Stowell and Ivano Caponigro for their input and support since the very beginning, when I was preparing the proposal for this issue; to Marcel den Dikken for his continuous encouragement and advice, punctually commenting on my every query. Many thanks to Ana Arregui and Marcel den Dikken for their comments on this introduction as well as to Elizabeth Laurençot and Teresa O’Neill for editorial assistance. Thanks to all the reviewers for accepting the job and for the generosity of their questions and comments to the authors, which have increased the quality of the papers. Thank you to all the contributors for their work, patience, and friendly correspondence throughout the process. My work in this special issue is dedicated to the memory of my son Pablo, stillborn when I was working on it, to his two brothers, Ignacio and Javier, and my husband, Rafa, for having had me wrapped in cotton wool since.

References

  1. Altshuler, Daniel. 2014. A typology of partitive aspectual operators. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. doi: 10.1007/s11049-014-9232-1. (This issue). Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, Roger W., and Yasuhiro Shirai. 1996. Primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: the pidgin/creole connection. In Handbook of second language acquisition, eds. William C. Ritchie and Tej K. Bhatia, 527–570. San Diego: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, Edna. 2012. Markedness. In The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, ed. Robert I. Binnik, 212–236. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  4. Arche, María J. 2006. Individuals in time: tense, aspect, and the individual/stage distinction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arche, María J. 2013. The construction of viewpoint aspect: the imperfective revisited. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. doi: 10.1007/s11049-013-9209-5. (This issue). Google Scholar
  6. Arregui, Ana. 2014. Aspectual operators across languages: a commentary on the paper by Daniel Altshuler. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. doi: 10.1007/s11049-014-9235-y. (This issue). Google Scholar
  7. Arregui, Ana, María Luisa Rivero, and Andrés Salanova. 2014. Crosslinguistic variation in imperfectivity. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. doi: 10.1007/s11049-013-9226-4. Google Scholar
  8. Arunachalam, Sudha, and Kothari, Anubha. 2010. Telicity and event culmination in Hindi perfectives. In: Proceedings of verb 2010, interdisciplinary workshop on verbs: the identification and representation of verb features, eds. Pier Marco Bertinetto, Anna Korhonen, Alessandro Lenci, Alissa Melinger, Sabine Schulte im Walde, and Aline Villavicencio, 16–19. Google Scholar
  9. Baker, Mark, and Lisa Travis. 1997. Mood as verbal definiteness in a tenseless language. Natural Language Semantics 5: 213–269. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1994. Statives, progressives, and habituals. Linguistics 32: 391–423. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 2001. On a frequent misunderstanding in the temporal-aspectual domain: the perfective-telic confusion. In Semantic interfaces, eds. Carlo Cecchetto, Gennaro Chierchia, and Maria T. Guasti, 177–210. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Google Scholar
  12. Bertinetto, Pier Marco, and Alessandro Lenci. 2012. Habituality, pluractionality, and imperfectivity. In The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, ed. Robert I. Binnik, 852–880. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  13. Bittner, Maria. 2003. Word order and incremental update. In Proceedings from Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 39, eds. Jonathon E. Cihlar, David Kaiser, Irene Kimbara, and Amy Franklin, 634–664. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  14. Bittner, Maria. 2005. Future discourse in a tenseless language. Journal of Semantics 22: 339–388. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bittner, Maria. 2006. Ontology for human talk and thought (not robotics). Theoretical Linguistics 32: 47–56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bittner, Maria. 2009. Tense, mood, and centering. Accessed at http://philpapers.org/rec/BITTMC.
  17. Bittner, Maria. 2014. Temporality: universals and variation. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  18. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2002. The grammar of time reference in Yukatek Maya. Munich: LINCOM. Google Scholar
  19. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2013. Aspect vs. relative tense: the case reopened. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. doi: 10.1007/s11049-013-9210-z. (This issue). Google Scholar
  20. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, and Mary D. Swift. 2004. Event realization and default aspect. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 263–296. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Boneh, Nora, and Edit Doron. 2010. Modal and temporal aspects of habituality. In Syntax, lexical semantics, and event structure, eds. Malka Rappaport-Hovav, Edit Doron, and Ivy Sichel, 338–363. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Borer, Hagit. 1998. Deriving passive without theta roles. In Morphology and its relations to phonology and syntax, eds. Steven G. Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari, and Patrick M. Farrell, 60–99. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Google Scholar
  23. Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Borik, Olga, and Maarten Jenssen. 2008. The nature of termination: the case of the Romance simple past. Presented at Chronos 2008. Google Scholar
  25. Borik, Olga, and Tanya Reinhart. 2004. Telicity and perfectivity: two independent systems. In Proceedings of LOLA 8 (symposium on logic and language), eds. László Hunyadi, György Rákosi, and Enikő Tóth, 13–34. Debrecen, Hungary. Google Scholar
  26. Broekhuis, Hans, and Henk J. Verkuyl. 2013. Binary tense and modality. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. doi: 10.1007/s11049-013-9213-9. (This issue). Google Scholar
  27. Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of the grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  28. Chung, Sandra, and Alan Timberlake. 1985. Tense, aspect, and mood. In Language typology and syntactic description, ed. Timothy Shopen. Vol. 3 of Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 202–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  29. Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. Restructuring and functional structure. In Structures and beyond: the cartography of syntactic structures, ed. Adriana Belletti. Vol. 3 of Oxford studies in comparative syntax, 132–191. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  30. Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: an introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  31. Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dahl, Östen. 1984. Temporal distance: remoteness distinctions in tense-aspect systems. Linguistics 21: 102–122. Google Scholar
  33. Dahl, Eystein. 2010. Time, tense, and aspect in early Vedic grammar: exploring inflectional semantics in the Rigveda. Brill Academic Publishers. doi: 10.1163/ej.9789004178144.i-475. Google Scholar
  34. Dahl, Östen, and Viveka Velupillai. 2011. Perfective/imperfective aspect. In The world atlas of language structures online, eds. Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, feature 65A. Accessed at http://wals.info/feature/65A. Google Scholar
  35. Declerck, Renaat. 1989. Boundedness and the structure of situations. Leuvense Bijdragen 78: 275–304. Google Scholar
  36. Demirdache, Hamida, and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria. 2000. The primitives of temporal relations. In Step by step: essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 157–186. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  37. Demirdache, Hamida, and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria. 2007. The syntax of time arguments. Lingua 117: 330–366. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Demirdache, Hamida, and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria. 2014. Aspect and temporal anaphora. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. doi: 10.1007/s11049-014-9231-2. (This issue). Google Scholar
  39. Depraetere, Ilse. 1995. On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 1–19. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. de Swart, Helen. 1998. Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16: 347–385. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ferreira, Marcelo. 2005. Event quantification and plurality. PhD diss., MIT, Cambridge. Google Scholar
  42. Filip, Hana. 2003. Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11: 55–101. Google Scholar
  43. Fortescue, Michael. 1984. West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm. Google Scholar
  44. Gehrke, Berit. 2008. Goals and sources are aspectually equal: evidence from Czech and Russian prefixes. Lingua 118: 1664–1689. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2012. Greek future and modal concord. In Proceedings of international conference on Greek linguistics (ICGL) 10, 6–61. Democritus University of Thrace. Google Scholar
  46. Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2014. The futurity of the present and the modality of the future: a commentary on the paper by Hans Broekhuis and Henk Verkuyl. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. doi: 10.1007/s11049-014-9234-z. (This issue). Google Scholar
  47. Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Alda Mari. 2012. The evidential nature of reasoning with the future. Ms. University of Chicago and ENS Paris. Google Scholar
  48. Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Alda Mari. 2013. Knowing the future: epistemic and metaphysical dimensions. Ms., University of Chicago and ENS Paris. Google Scholar
  49. Giorgi, Alessandra, and Fabio Pianesi. 1997. Tense and aspect: from semantics to morphosyntax. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  50. Hale, Kenneth. 1986. Notes on world view and semantic categories: some Warlpiri examples. In Features and projections, eds. Pieter Muysken and Henk C. van Riemsdijk, 233–254. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar
  51. Holt, Jens. 1943. Études d’aspect. Acta Jutlandica 15: 1–84. Copenhagen: Universitetsforlaget I and Aarhus: Ejnar Munskgaard. Google Scholar
  52. Kamp, Hans, and Christian Rohrer. 1983. Tense in texts. In Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, eds. Rainer Bäerle, Christoph Schwarze, and Arnim von Stechow, 250–269. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  53. Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  54. Klein, Wolfgang. 1995. A time-relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language 71: 669–695. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Klein, Wolfgang. 2009. How time is encoded. In The expression of time, eds. Wolfgang Klein and Ping Li, 39–82. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Klein, Wolfgang. 2014. Is aspect time-relational? Commentary on Jürgen Bohnemeyer: aspect vs. relative tense: the case reopened. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. doi: 10.1007/s11049-014-9240-1. (This issue). Google Scholar
  57. Kratzer, Angelika. 1989. An investigation of the lumps of thought. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 607–653. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kratzer, Angelika. 2011. Situations in natural language semantics. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Accessed at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/situations-semantics/. Google Scholar
  59. Krifka, Manfred. 1998. The origins of telicity. In Events and grammar, ed. Susan Rothstein, 197–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lardiere, Donna. 2000. Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In Second language acquisition and linguistic theory, ed. John Archibald, 102–129. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  61. Lardiere, Donna. 2007. Acquiring (or assembling) functional categories in second language acquisition. In Proceedings of the 2nd conference on generative approaches to language acquisition North America (GALANA), eds. Alyona Belikova, Luisa Meroni, and Mari Umeda, 233–244. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Google Scholar
  62. Lardiere, Donna. 2008. Feature-assembly in second language acquisition. In The role of formal features in second language acquisition, eds. Juana Liceras, Helen Goodluck, and Helmut Zobl, 107–140. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  63. Lin, Jo-Wang. 2012. Tenselessness. In The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, ed. Robert I. Binnik, 669–695. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  64. Mourelatos, Alexander P. 1978. Events, processes and states. Linguistics and Philosophy 2: 415–434. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ogihara, Toshiyuki. 1999. Tense and aspect. In The handbook of Japanese linguistics, ed. Natsuko Tsujimura, 326–348. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  66. Partee, Barbara. 1973. Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. Journal of Philosophy 70: 601–609. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Partee, Barbara. 1984. Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 243–286. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Piñón, Christopher. 1997. Achievements in an event semantics. In Proceedings of SALT VII, ed. Aaron Lawson, 276–293. Ithaca: Cornell University. Google Scholar
  69. Pratas, Fernanda. 2014. The perfective, the progressive and the (dis)closure of situations: comment on the paper by María J. Arche. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. doi: 10.1007/s11049-014-9236-x. (This issue). Google Scholar
  70. Pratas, Fernanda, and Nina Hyams. 2010. Introduction to the acquisition of finiteness in Capeverdean. In Language acquisition and development: proceedings of GALA 2009, eds. João Costa, Ana Castro, Maria Lobo, and Fernanda Pratas, 378–390. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press. Google Scholar
  71. Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: a first-phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rassudova, Olga. 1968. Upotreblenie vidov glagola. Moscow: Mežduharodnyj seminar prepodavatelej russkogo jazyka zarubežnykh stran. Google Scholar
  73. Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of symbolic logic. New York: The Free Press. Google Scholar
  74. Reis Silva, Maria Amélia, and Lisa Matthewson. 2007. An instantaneous present tense in Blackfoot. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on the semantics of underrepresented languages in the Americas, ed. Amy Rose Deal. Vol. 35 of University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics, 191–214. Amherst: GLSA Publications. Google Scholar
  75. Ritter, Elisabeth, and Sara Rosen. 2000. Event structure and ergativity. In Events as grammatical objects, eds. Carol Tenny and James Pustejovsky, 187–238. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Google Scholar
  76. Ritter, Elisabeth, and Martina Wiltschko. 2004. The lack of tense as a syntactic category: evidence from Blackfoot and Halkomelem. Paper presented at the 39th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, North Vancouver and the Canadian Linguistics Association Annual Meeting, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg. Google Scholar
  77. Ritter, Elisabeth, and Martina Wiltschko. 2009. Varieties of infl: tense, location, and person. In Alternatives to cartography, eds. Jeroen van Craenenbroeck and Henk van Riemsdijk, 153–202. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Salaberry, Rafael and Yasuhiro Shirai, eds. 2002. Tense-aspect morphology in L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar
  79. Schwartz, Bonnie, and Rex A. Sprouse. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research 12: 40–72. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shaer, Benjamin. 2003. Toward the tenseless analysis of a tenseless language. In Proceedings of SULA 2, eds. Jan Anderssen, Paula Menéndez Benito, and Adam Werle, 139–156. Amherst: GLSA Publications. Google Scholar
  81. Smith, Carlota. 1991. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stowell, Timothy A. 1993. Syntax of tense. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles. Google Scholar
  83. Stowell, Timothy A. 1996. The phrase-structure of tense. In Phrase structure and the lexicon, eds. Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring. Studies in natural language and linguistic theory, 277–291. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stowell, Timothy A. 2007. The syntactic expression of tense. Lingua 117: 437–463. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stowell, Timothy A. 2008. Where the past is in the perfect. In Tiempos compuestos y formas verbales complejas, ed. Ángeles Carrasco Gutierrez. Vol. 34 of Lingüistica Iberoamericana, 103–118. Madrid: Vervuet. Google Scholar
  86. Stowell, Timothy A. 2014. Capturing simultaneity: a commentary on the paper by Hamida Demirdache and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. doi: 10.1007/s11049-014-9241-0. (This issue). Google Scholar
  87. ter Meulen, Alice G. B. 1995. Representing time in natural language. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  88. Te Winkel, Lammert Allard. 1866. Over de wijzen en tijden der werkwoorden. De Taalgids 8: 66–75. Google Scholar
  89. Travis, Lisa. 1994. Event phrase and a theory of functional categories. In Proceedings of the 1994 annual conference of the Canadian linguistic association. Toronto working papers in linguistics, 559–570. Toronto. Google Scholar
  90. Verkuyl, Henk J. 1993. A theory of aspectuality: the interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Verkuyl, Henk J. 2008. Binary tense. Vol. 187 of CSLI lecture notes. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GreenwichLondonUK

Personalised recommendations