Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Base-driven leveling in Yiddish verb paradigms

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman, Farrell, and James P. Blevins. 2006. Paradigms and predictability. Paper presented at the 2006 meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Albuquerque, NM, Jan. 5–8.

  • Albright, Adam. 2002a. The identification of bases in morphological paradigms. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles. http://www.mit.edu/albright/papers/AlbrightDiss.html.

  • Albright, Adam. 2002b. Islands of reliability for regular morphology: evidence from Italian. Language. 78: 684–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albright, Adam. 2005. The morphological basis of paradigm leveling. In Paradigms in phonological theory, eds. Laura J. Downing, Tracy Alan Hall, and Renate Raffelsiefen, 17–43. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albright, Adam. 2008a. Explaining universal tendencies and language particulars in analogical change. In Language universals and language change, ed. Jeff Good, 144–181. London: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Albright, Adam. 2008b. Inflectional paradigms have bases too: evidence from Yiddish. In The bases of inflectional identity, eds. Asaf Bachrach and Andrew Nevins, 271–312. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albright, Adam, and Bruce Hayes. 2002. Modeling English past tense intuitions with minimal generalization. In SIGPHON 6: proceedings of the sixth meeting of the ACL special interest group in computational phonology, 58–69.

  • Baayen, R. Harald, Richard Piepenbrock, and Hedderik van Rijn. 1993. The CELEX lexical data base on CD-ROM. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baković, Eric. 1999. Assimilation to the unmarked. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 6.1, eds. Jim Alexander, Na-Rae Han, and Michelle Minnick Fox, 1–16

  • Baroni, Marco. 1998. The phonetic nature of the Northern Italian allophones [s] and [z] in words with variable realization: electroglottographic and acoustic evidence. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 96: 166–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behaghel, Otto. 1928. Geschichte der deutschen Sprache, 5th edn. No. 3 in Grundriss der germanischen Philologie, Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benua, Laura. 1997. Transderivational identity: phonological relations between words. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Benveniste, Émile. 1966. La nature des pronoms. In Problèmes de linguistique générale, 251–266. Saint-Amand: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besch, Werner. 1967. Sprachlandschaften und Sprachausgleich im 15. Jahrhundert: Studien zur Erforschung der spätmittelhochdeutschen Schreibdialekte und zur Entstehung der neuhochdeutschen Schriftsprache. Vol. 11 of Bibliotheca Germanica. Handbücher, Texte und Monographien aus dem Gebiete der germanischen Philologie. München: Francke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bin-Nun, Jechiel. 1973. Jiddisch und die deutschen Mundarten: unter besondere Berücksichtigung des ostgalizischen Jiddisch. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blevins, James P. 2000. Markedness and agreement. Transactions of the Philological Society 98: 233–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blevins, James P. 2006. Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42: 531–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, Otto. 1895. Zum deutschen Vokalismus. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 20: 80–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burzio, Luigi. 1994. Metrical consistency. In Proceedings of the DIMACS workshop on human language, ed. Eric Ristad. Providence: American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Matthew. 1970. Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica 22: 129–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clahsen, Harald, Fraibet, Aveledo, and Iggy Roca. 2002a. The development of regular and irregular verb inflection in Spanish child language. Journal of Child Language 29: 591–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clahsen, Harald, Peter Prüfert, Sonja Eisenbeiss, and Joana Cholin. 2002b. Strong stems in the German mental lexicon: evidence from child language acquisition and adult processing. In More than words. Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich, eds. Ingrid Kaufmann and Barbara Stiebels, 91–112. Berlin: Akadamie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dammers, Ulf, Walter Hoffmann, and Hans-Joachim Solms. 1988. Grammatik des Frühneuhochdeutschen. Vol. 4 of Flexion der starken und schwachen Verben. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinnsen, Daniel A., and Charles-Luce Jan. 1984. Phonological neutralization, phonetic implementation and individual differences. Journal of Phonetics 12(1): 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresher, B. Elan. 2000. Analogical levelling of vowel length in West Germanic. In Analogy, levelling, markedness: principles of change in phonology and morphology, ed. Aditi Lahiri. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, Robert Peter, Oskar Reichmann, Hans-Joachim Solms, and Klaus-Peter Wegera. 1993. Frühneuhochdeutsche Grammatik. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernestus, Mirjam, and R. Harald Baayen. 2003. Predicting the unpredictable: interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language 79: 5–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber, Alice, and Robert D. King. 1984. Yiddish and the settlement history of Ashkenazic Jewry. Mankind Quarterly 24: 393–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fertig, David. 2000. Morphological change up close: two and a half centuries of verbal inflection in Nuremberg. Vol. 422 of Linguistische Arbeiten. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follmann, Michael Ferdinand, ed. 1909. Wörterbuch der deutsch-lothringischen Mundarten. Vol. 12 of Quellen zur lothringischen Geschichte. Leipzig: Quelle und Meyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frakes, Jerold C. 2004. Early Yiddish texts: 1100–1750. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaeta, Livio. 2002. Umlaut extension in German modals as natural change. Diachronica 19: 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, Andrew. 2008. Paradigmatic uniformity and markedness. In Language universals and language change, ed. Jeff Good, 125–143. Oxford: University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, Alfred. 1912. Die starke Konjugation bei Johann Fischart. Halle: Hofbuchdruckerei C. A. Kaemmerer & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, Teodor. 1928. Di konsonantn asimilatsye in zats [Consonantal assimilation in sentences]. Filologishe shriftn 107–110.

  • Haines, James L. 1975. Proto-Yiddish and the history of Yiddish phonology: the front rounded vowel phonemes. No. 9 in Working papers in Yiddish and East European Jewish Studies. YIVO Institute for Jewish Research.

  • Hall, T. A., and John H. G. Scott. 2007. Inflectional paradigms have a base: evidence from Southern German dialects. Morphology 17: 151–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, Heidi, and Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: a feature-geometric analysis. Language 78: 482–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, James. 1974. Morphologization of phonological rules: an example from Chicano Spanish. In Linguistic studies in Romance languages, eds. R. Joe Campbell, Mark G. Goldin, and Mary Clayton Wang, 8–27. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Zellig S. 1951. Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Bruce. 1999. Phonological restructuring in Yidiɲ and its theoretical consequences. In The derivational residue in phonological optimality theory, eds. Ben Hermans and Marc van Oostendorp, 175–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, Marvin I. 1965. The Yiddish language in Northern Poland: its geography and history. Bloomington: Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoenigswald, Henry. 1960. Language change and linguistic reconstruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, Joan. 1980. Child morphology and morphophonemic change. In Historical morphology, ed. Jacek Fisiak, 157–187. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itô, Junko, and Armin Mester. 1995. The core-periphery structure of the lexicon and constraints on reranking. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics [UMOP] 18: papers in Optimality Theory, eds. Jill Beckman, Suzanne Urbanczyk, and Laura Walsh Dickey, 181–209. Amherst: GLSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itô, Junko, and Armin Mester. 2002. The phonological lexicon. In A handbook of Japanese linguistics, ed. Natsuko Tsujimura, 62–100. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Neil G. 1989. Hebrew-Aramaic origin verbs in Yiddish: the interplay of inherited form and synchronic phonology. Mediterranean Language Review 4–5: 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Neil G. 1990. Economy in Yiddish vocalism: a study in the interplay of Hebrew and non-Hebrew components, Mediterranean language and culture monograph series. Otto: Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Neil G. 1993. On pre-Yiddish standardization of quantity. Diachronica 10: 191–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Neil G. 2005. Yiddish: a linguistic introduction. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, Roman. 1932. Zur Structur des russischen Verbums. Charisteria Guilelmo Mathesio Quinquagenario 74–83.

  • Jasanoff, Jay H. 1973. The Germanic third weak class. Language 49: 850–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joesten, Maria. 1931. Untersuchungen zu ahd. (as.) ë, i, vor u der Folgesilbe und zur 1. Pers. Sg. Präs. Ind. der starken e-Verben (Kl. IIIb, IV, V). In Gießener Beiträge zur deutschen Philologie, No. 28. Gießen: Wilhem Schmitz Verlag. 1968 reprint, Swets & Zeitlinger N.V., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joos, Martin. 1952. The medieval sibilants. Language 28: 222–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kager, René. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kager, René. 2008. Lexical irregularity and the typology of contrast. In The nature of the word: essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky, eds. Kristin Hanson and Sharon Inkelas, 397–432. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Dovid. 1987. Grammar of the Yiddish language. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenstowicz, Michael. 1997. Base identity and uniform exponence: alternatives to cyclicity. In Current trends in phonology: models and methods, eds. Jacques Durand and Bernard Laks, 363–394. Salford: University of Salford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenstowicz, Michael, and Charles Kisseberth. 1977. Topics in phonological theory. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, Paul Oskar. 1903. Das starke Verb bei Grimmelshausen: Ein Beitrag zur Grammatik des Frühneuhochdeutschen. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Robert D.. 1969. Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Robert D. 1980. The history of final devoicing in Yiddish. In The field of Yiddish: studies in language, folklore, and literature, fourth collection, eds. Marvin I. Herzog, Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Dan Miron, and Ruth Wisse, 371–430. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1965. Phonological change. PhD thesis, MIT.

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Universals in linguistic theory, eds. Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms, 171–2002. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Reprinted in Kiparsky (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1974. Remarks on analogical change. In Historical linguistics II: theory and description in phonology. Proceedings of the first international conference on historial linguistics, Edinburg 2nd–7th, September 1973, eds. John M. Anderson and Ch. Jones, Vol. 12 of North-Holland Linguistic Series, 426–445. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Reprinted in Kiparsky (1982), 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1978. Analogical change as a problem for linguistic theory. In Linguistics in the seventies: directions and prospects. No. 8:2 in Studies in the linguistic sciences, 217–236. Urbana: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Illinois, Urbana. Reprinted in Kiparsky (1982), 217–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Explanation in phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisseberth, Charles. 1970. On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 291–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko, Heejeong. 2006. Base-output correspondence in Korean nominal inflection. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15(3): 195–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopkallı, Handan. 1993. A phonetic and phonological analysis of final devoicing in Turkish. PhD thesis, University of Michigan.

  • Kranzmayer, Eberhard. 1956. Historische Lautgeographie des gesamtbairischen Dialektraumes. Vienna: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. The nature of the so-called analogical processes. (Trans.: Margaret Winters, 1995), Diachronica, 12: 113–145

  • Lahiri, Aditi, and Bezalel Elan Dresher. 1984. Diachronic and synchronic implications of declension shifts. The Linguistic Review 3: 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, Alfred. 1895. Das Deminutivum der galizisch-jüdischen Mundart. Deutsche Mundarten 1: 46–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lass, Roger. 1980. Paradigm coherence and the conditioning of sound change. In Historical morphology, ed. Jacek Fisiak, 251–272. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levita [Bokher], Elia. 1541. Bovo D’Antona. Isny. Facsimile edition (1945) in Elye Bokher: Poetishe shafungen in Yidish, Ershter band: reproduktsye fun der ershter oysgobe ‘Bovo D’Antone’, Isny, 1541, mit a kurtsn araynfir fun Yuda A. Yofe, [Elye Bokher: Poetic words in Yiddish, Vol. 1: reproduction of the first edition ‘Bovo D’Antone’, Isny, 1541, with a short introduction by Judah A. Joffe] ed. Judah A. Joffe. New York: Judah A. Joffe Publication Committee.

  • Manaster Ramer, Alexis, and Meyer Wolf. 1997. Yiddish origins and the Austro-Bavarian problem. Folia Linguistica Historica 17: 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mańczak, Witold. 1958. Tendences générales des changements analogiques. Lingua 7: 298–325, 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mańczak, Witold. 1980. Laws of analogy. In Historical morphology, ed. Jacek Fisiak, 283–288. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, Gary, Steven Pinker, Michael Ullman, Michelle Hollander, T. John Rosen, and Fei Xu. 1992. Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

  • Marti, Werner. 1985. Berndeutsch-Grammatik für die heutige Mundart zwischen Thun und Jura. Bern: Francke Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayerthaler, Willi. 1981. Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion. English translation by Janice Siedler (1981), Morphological Naturalness. Ann Arbor: Karoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John J. 1998. Morpheme structure constraints and paradigm occultation. In CLS 32, Vol. II: the panels, eds. M. Catherine Gruber, Derrick Higgins, Kenneth Olson, and Tamra Wysocki. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John J. 2005. Optimal paradigms. In Paradigms in phonological theory, eds. Laura J. Downing, Tracy Alan Hall, and Renate Raffelsiefen, 170–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available from the Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-485.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, Martha. 2005. On markedness asymmetries in person and number. Language 81: 699–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mieses, Matthias. 1924. Die jiddische Sprache: Eine historische Grammatik des Idioms der integralen Juden Ost- und Mitteleuropas. Berlin/Vienna: Benjamin Harz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Richard E. 2005. Attraction to the unmarked in Old Spanish leveling. In Selected proceedings of the 7th Hispanic linguistics symposium, ed. David Eddington, 180–191. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. http://www.lingref.com/cpp/hls/7/paper1097.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordström, Torsten. 1911. Studien über die Ausbilding der neuhochdeutschen starken Präsensinflexion. Uppsala dissertation.

  • Nübling, Damaris. 2000. Prinzipien der Irregularisierung: Eine kontrastive Analyse von zehn Verben in zehn germanischen Sprachen. No. 415 in Linguistische Arbeiten. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osthoff, Hermann, and Karl Brugmann. 1878. Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen: Erster Theil. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Hermann. 1920. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 5th edn. Halle: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Hermann, Peter Wiehl, and Siegfried Grosse. 1989. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik, 23rd edn. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paunonen, Heikki. 1976. Allomorfien dynamiikkaa. Virittäjä 79: 82–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penny, Ralph. 2002. A history of the Spanish language, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penzl, Herbert. 1949. Umlaut and secondary umlaut in Old High German. Language 25: 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penzl, Herbert. 1968. Die mittelhochdeutschen Sibilanten und ihre Weiterentwicklung. Word 24: 340–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipp, Gerhard. 1980. Einführung ins Frühneuhochdeutsche: Sprachgeschichte, Grammatik, Texte. Heidelberg: Quelle und Meyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and rules: the ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Port, Robert, and Michael O’Dell. 1986. Neutralization of syllable-final voicing in German. Journal of Phonetics 13: 455–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilutski, Noah. 1917. Der yidisher konsonantizm [The Yiddish consonantism], No. 1 in Yidishe dialektologishe forshungen [Yiddish dialectological research]. Warsaw: Nayer Farlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 2004. Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokosch, Eduard. 1939. A comparative Germanic grammar. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockowitz, Anna C. 1979. 201 Yiddish verbs, fully conjugated in all the tenses. Woodbury: Barron’s Education Series, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, Charles V. J. 1982. Studies in historical German phonology: a phonological comparison of MHG and NHG with reference to modern dialects. Vol. 616 of European university studies, series I: German language and literature. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadock, Jerrold M. 1973. Word-final devoicing in the development of Yiddish. In Issues in linguistics: papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane, eds. Braj B. Kachru, Robert B. Lees, Yakov Malkiel, Angelina Pietrangeli, and Sol Saporta, 790–797. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, Edward. 1915. Notes on Judeo-German phonology. The Jewish Quarterly Review 6: 231–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, Jochem. 1974. Fragen zum paradigmatischen Ausgleich. Die Sprache 20: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirmunski, Viktor M. 1962. Deutsche Mundartkunde. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonderegger, Stefan. 2003. Althochdeutsche Sprache und Literatur: Eine Einführung in das älteste Deutsch: Darstellung und Grammatik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steriade, Donca. 2000. Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics/phonology boundary. In Papers in laboratory phonology V: acquisition and the lexicon, eds. Michael Broe and Janet Pierrehumbert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturgeon, Anne. 2003. Paradigm uniformity: evidence for inflectional bases. In WCCFL 22 Proceedings eds. Gina Garding and Mimu Tsujimura, 464–476. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, Edgar H. 1917. Linguistic change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Republished 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiersma, Peter. 1982. Local and general markedness. Language 58: 832–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vennemann, Theo. 1972. Phonetic analogy and conceptual analogy. In Schuchhardt, the Neogrammarians, and the transformational theory of phonological change: four essays by Hugo Schuchhardt, eds. Theo Vennemann and Terence H. Wilbur, No. 26 in Linguistische Forschungen, 183–204. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, Nigel. 1974. Analogy reconsidered. In Historical linguistics II: theory and description in phonology. Proceedings of the first international conference on historical linguistics. Edinburgh 2nd–7th, September 1973, eds. John M. Anderson and Charles Jones, Vol. 12b of North-Holland Linguistic Series, 426–445. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegera, Klaus-Peter. 1985. Morphologie des frühneuhochdeutschen. In Sprachgeschichte: Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung, Vol. 2, eds. Werner Besch, Oskar Reichmann, and Stefan Sonderegger, 1313–1322. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Chap. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinhold, Karl. 1883. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik, 2nd edn. Paderborn: Schöningh. Reprinted 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreich, Max. 1928. Vegn di daytshishe elementn in Yidish: leksikologisher etyud [Regarding the German elements in Yiddish: lexicological etude]. Tsaytshrift far di yidisher geshikhte, demografie un ekonomik, literatur-forshung, shprakhvisnshaft un etnografie. [Journal for Jewish History, Demography and Economics, Literature Research, Linguistics and Ethnography], 2–3: 677–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreich, Max. 1973. Geshikhte fun der yidisher shprakh: Bagrifn, faktn, metodn [History of the Yiddish language: concepts, facts, methods], Vol. 2. New York: Yidisher Visnshaftlikher Institut (YIVO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreich, Uriel. 1958. Yiddish and colonial German in Eastern Europe: the differential impact of Slavic. In American contributions to the fourth international congress of Slavicists, Moscow, September 1958, 369–421. ’s-Gravenhage: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreich, Uriel. 1990. Modern English-Yiddish, Yiddish-English dictionary. New York: YIVO Institute for Jewish Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzels, Leo. 1984. Paradigm leveling in Latin and Old French: a critical view of rule inversion. In Papers from the XIIth linguistic symposium on romance languages, ed. Philip Baldi, No. 26 in Current issues in linguistic theory, 579–599. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaretski, Ayzik. 1926. Praktishe yidishe gramatik far lerers un studentn. [Practical Yiddish grammar for teachers and students]. Moscow: Farlag Aktsionern Gezelshaft “Shul un Bukh”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehetner, Ludwig. 1985. Das bairische Dialektbuch. München: Verlag C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA

    Adam Albright

Authors
  1. Adam Albright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Albright.

Additional information

This paper has benefitted greatly from helpful discussion and pointers by Edward Flemming, Andrew Garrett, Bruce Hayes, Neil Jacobs, Michael Kenstowicz, Donca Steriade, and two anonymous reviewers; all remaining errors are, of course, my own.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Albright, A. Base-driven leveling in Yiddish verb paradigms. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 28, 475–537 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9107-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9107-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation