A study on operational ability comparing drone-centric and user-centric control in external piloting

Abstract

Drone manipulation can be divided into external piloting and internal piloting. Internal piloting is a technique where a user monitors the status of a drone and controls it. On the other hand, external piloting is a technique in which the user controls a drone from the point of view of the user. In this case, external piloting can cause the operator to make a mistake regarding the operation of the drone due to the difference in viewpoint between the user and the drone when operating the drone. Therefore, this paper proposes a method to solve this difficulty of drone operation by mismatching the viewpoint between the drones and the users. We compare the user-centric method of con-trolling the drones considering the user’s point of view and the drone-centric method of controlling the drones considering the drone’s point of view. Through this experiment, we demonstrate the excellence of a user-centric point of view. Additional study includes whether the difficulty of drone manipulation can be overcome by learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

References

  1. 1.

    Baiocchi V, Dominici D, Mormile M (2013) UAV application in post-seismic environment. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 1:W2

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Canan JW (1999) Seeing more, and risking less, with UAVs. Aerosp AM 37(10):26–31

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    DJI - The World Leader in Camera Drones/Quadcopters for Aerial Photography. http://www.dji.com/cendence. Accessed 18 Mar 2020

  4. 4.

    DJI Products (2020) Available online: http://www.dji.com/products. Accessed 18 Mar 2020

  5. 5.

    DJI’s Spark Is a Hand-Gesture Controlled Drone that Flies Off Your Hand - The Drive, http://www.thedrive.com/aerial/10674/djis-spark-is-a-hand-gesture-controlled-drone-that-flies-off-your-hand. Accessed 18 Mar 2020

  6. 6.

    Ercoline W, Olson W, Delauer E, Fale C, Tvaryanas A (2006) Spatial disorientation in uninhabited aerial vehicles. Human factors of remotely operat-ed vehicles, a framework for analysis and preliminary empirical study. Aviat Space Environ Med 77(3):12

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Garcia A, Mattison E, Ghose K (2015) High-speed vision-based autonomous indoor navigation of a quadcopter. In 2015 international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), pp 338-347. IEEE

  8. 8.

    Hanafi D, Qetkeaw M, Ghazali R, Than MNM, Utomo WM, Omar R (2013) Simple GUI wireless controller of quadcopter

  9. 9.

    Hing JT, Oh PY (2009) Development of an unmanned aerial vehicle piloting system with integrated motion cueing for training and pilot evaluation. J Intell Robot Syst 54(1–3):3–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-008-9252-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Holton AE, Lawson S, Love C (2015) Unmanned aerial vehicles: opportunities, barriers, and the future of “drone journalism”. Journal Pract 9(5):634–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.980596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hyneman J (2002) U.S. Patent No. 6,458,008. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kim BH, Kim M, Jo S (2014) Quadcopter flight control using a low-cost hybrid interface with EEG-based classification and eye tracking. Comput Biol Med 51:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lee B, Kim E, Nam C, Shin D (2017) User-centric drone controller for preventing operation mistake, proceeding of the sixth international conference on advances in computing, control and networking, ACC 2017, pp 157-160

  14. 14.

    Li H, Wang B, Liu L, Tian G, Zheng T, Zhang J (2013) The design and application of SmartCopter: an unmanned helicopter based robot for transmission line inspection. In 2013 Chinese Automation Congress, pp 697-702. IEEE

  15. 15.

    Mogili UR, Deepak BBVL (2018) Review on application of drone systems in precision agriculture. Procedia Comput Sci 133:502–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Newcome LR (2004) Unmanned aviation: a brief history of unmanned aerial vehicles. General Publication

  17. 17.

    Ribeiro R, Ramos J, Safadinho D, de Jesus Pereira AM (2018) UAV for everyone: an intuitive control alternative for drone racing competitions. In 2018 2nd international conference on technology and innovation in sports, health and wellbeing (TISHW), pp 1-8). IEEE

  18. 18.

    Rosales C, Gimenez J, Rossomando F, Soria C, Sarcinelli-Filho M, Carelli R (2019) UAVs formation control with dynamic compensation using Neuro adaptive SMC. In 2019 international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), pp 93-99. IEEE

  19. 19.

    Saakes D, Choudhary V, Sakamoto D, Inami M, Lgarashi T (2013) A teleoperating interface for ground vehicles using autonomous flying cameras. In: Artificial reality and Telexistence (ICAT), 2013 23rd international conference on, pp 13–19

  20. 20.

    Santos MC, Santana LV, Martins MM, Brandão AS, Sarcinelli-Filho M (2015) Estimating and controlling uav position using rgb-d/imu data fusion with decentralized information/kalman filter. In 2015 IEEE international conference on industrial technology (ICIT), pp 232–239. IEEE.

  21. 21.

    Shukla A, Xiaoqian H, Karki H (2016) Autonomous tracking and navigation controller for an unmanned aerial vehicle based on visual data for inspection of oil and gas pipelines. In 2016 16th international conference on control, automation and systems (ICCAS), pp 194-200. IEEE

  22. 22.

    Swing Quadcopter Minidrone. https://www.parrot.com/global/minidrones/parrot-swing#perform-the-greatest-aerobatic-manoeuvres. Accessed 18 Mar 2020

  23. 23.

    Weibel RE, Hansman RJ (2006) Safety considerations for operation of unmanned aerial vehicles in the national airspace system

  24. 24.

    Williams KW (2006) Human factors implications of unmanned aircraft accidents: flight-control problems (No. DOT/FAA/AM-06/8). Federnal Aviation Administration Oklahoma City of Civle Aeromecial Inst

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by INHA UNIVERSITY Research Grant.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Choonsung Nam.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suh, M., Nam, C. A study on operational ability comparing drone-centric and user-centric control in external piloting. Multimed Tools Appl (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09119-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Drone piloting
  • User-centric
  • Drone-centric
  • External piloting
  • Operational ability
  • Learning effect