Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Use of a novel set of features based on texture anisotropy for identification of liver steatosis from ultrasound images: a simple method

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detection of fatty liver disease (steatosis) from the ultra sound (US) images using pattern recognition techniques is attempted by many authors. Different pre-processing methods, feature extraction, feature selection and classification models are reported in the literature. The present work uses a hitherto unexplored property of liver texture. A careful visual observation reveals that the liver texture is anisotropic. A novel set of features exploiting this anisotropy is explicitly proposed. These anisotropy features are derived from gray level difference histogram (GLDH), pair correlation function (PCF), probabilistic local directionality statistics and randomness of texture (GLCM-χ8). For comparison with other features, the most popular gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) derived features are also extracted. Accordingly, three alternative data sets are prepared to classify the images with five different classifiers –Bayesian, multilayer perceptron (MLP), probabilistic neural network (PNN), learning vector quantisation (LVQ) and support vector machine (SVM). A comparative evaluation in terms of specificity, sensitivity, discrimination score and accuracy has been made while classifying US images of human livers. On the basis of results this paper enumerates as to how the anisotropy feature provides better entity for classification purpose in the present context. It is also shown that the highest accuracy of 99% is obtained using anisotropy features with PNN. Anisotropy features leads to 100% sensitivity with PNN and SVM. The present classification system with anisotropy features outperforms the existing models available in the literature keeping in mind the simplicity of the algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acharya UR, Fujita H, Bhat S, Raghavendra U, Gudigar A, Molinari F, Vijayananthan A, Ng KH (2016) Decision support system for fatty liver disease using GIST descriptors extracted from ultrasound images. Inf Fusion 29:32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Acharya UR, Fujita H, Sudarshan VK, Mookiah MRK, Koh JE, Tan JH, Hagiwara Y, Chua CK, Junnarkar SP, Vijayananthan A, Ng KH (2016) An integrated index for identification of fatty liver disease using radon transform and discrete cosine transform features in ultrasound images. Inf Fusion 31:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Acharya UR, Raghavendra U, Fujita H, Hagiwara Y, Koh JE, Hong TJ, Sudarshan VK, Vijayananthan A, Yeong CH, Gudigar A, Ng KH (2016) Automated characterization of fatty liver disease and cirrhosis using curvelet transform and entropy features extracted from ultrasound images. Comput Biol Med 79:250–2508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Acharya UR, Sree SV, Ribeiro R, Krishnamurthi G, Marinho RT, Sanches J, Suri JS (2012) Data mining framework for fatty liver disease classification in ultrasound: a hybrid feature extraction paradigm. Med Phys 39(7):4255–4264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alivar A, Danyali H, Helfroush MS (2016) Hierarchical classification of normal fatty and heterogeneous liver diseases from ultrasound images using serial and parallel feature fusion. Biocybern and Biomed Eng 36(4):697–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Andrade A, Silva JS, Santos J, Belo-Soares P (2012) Classifier approaches for liver steatosis using ultrasound images. Procedia Tech 5:763–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aras B, Ertüzün A, Erçil A (1999) Higher order statistics based texture analysis method for defect inspection of textile products. In NSIP, pp. 858–862

  8. Araújo AR, Rosso N, Bedogni G, Tiribelli C, Bellentani S (2018) Global epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/non-alcoholic steato hepatitis: What we need in the future. Liver Int 38(S1):47–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arivazhagan S, Ganesan L (2003) Texture classification using wavelet transform. Pattern Recogn Lett 24(9–10):1513–1521

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. CRC press, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Celebi E, Alpkocak A (2000) Clustering of texture features for content-based image retrieval. In International Conference on Advances in Information Systems, Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 216–225

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP (2002) SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res 16:321–357

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Chetverikov D (1994) GLDH based analysis of texture anisotropy and symmetry: an experimental study. 12th IAPR International Conference on Computer Vision & Image Processing Proceedings of the IEEE 1: 444–448

  14. Clausi DA (1996) Texture segmentation of SAR sea ice imagery. PhD Thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clausi DA (2002) An analysis of co-occurrence texture statistics as a function of grey level quantization. Can J Remote Sens 28(1):45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cordón O, del Jesus MJ, Herrera F (1999) A proposal on reasoning methods in fuzzy rule-based classification systems. Int J Approx Reason 20(1):21–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Cui Y, Dong H, Zhou E (2008) An early fire detection method based on smoke texture analysis and discrimination. Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP'08) IEEE 3:95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Duseja A (2010) Non alcoholic fatty liver disease in India–a lot done yet more required! Indian J Gastroenterol 29(6):217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eleyan A, Demirel H (2011) Co-occurrence matrix and its statistical features as a new approach for face recognition. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci 19(1):97–107

    Google Scholar 

  21. Freund Y, Schapire RE (1995) A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. In: European conference on computational learning theory. Springer, Berlin, pp. 23–37

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gaitini D, Lederman M, Baruch Y, Ghersin E, Veitsman E, Kerner H, Shalem B, Yaniv G, Sarfaty C, Azhari H (2005) Computerised analysis of liver texture with correlation to needle biopsy. Eur J of Ultrasound 26(03):197–202

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gao S, Peng Y, Guo H, Liu W, Gao T, Xu Y, Tang X (2014) Texture analysis and classification of ultrasound liver images. Biomed Mater Eng 24(1):1209–1216

    Google Scholar 

  24. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 3(6):610–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Haykin S (2004) Neural Network- A comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, NewYork, p 41

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ho TK (1995) Random decision forests. 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Montreal, pp 278–282

    Google Scholar 

  27. Huang Y, Han X, Tian X, Zhao Z, Zhao J, Hao D (2010) Texture analysis of ultrasonic liver images based on spatial domain methods. 3rd International Congress Image and Signal Processing (CISP) IEEE 2:562–565

  28. Japkowicz N (2000) The Class Imbalance Problem: Significance and Strategies In Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IC-AI’2000): Special Track on Inductive Learning Las Vegas Nevada

  29. Kohonen T (1990) Improved versions of learning vector quantization. In IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks pp. 545–550

  30. Lee WL, Chen YC, Hsieh KS (2003) Ultrasonic liver tissues classification by fractal feature vector based on M-band wavelet transform. IEEE Trans on Med Imaging 22(3):382–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lehoucq R, Weiss J, Dubrulle B, Amon AL, Bouil A, Crassous J, Amitrano D, Graner F (2015) Analysis of image vs position scale and direction reveals pattern texture anisotropy. Front Phys 2:84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li G, Luo Y, Deng W, Xu X, Liu A, Song E (2008) Computer aided diagnosis of fatty liver ultrasonic images based on support vector machine. EMBS 2008, 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, pp. 4768–4771

  33. Li G, Luo Y, Deng W, Xu X, Liu A, Song E (2008) Computer aided diagnosis of fatty liver ultrasonic images based on support vector machine. In 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: 4768–4771

  34. Ling C, Li C (1998) Data Mining for Direct Marketing Problems and Solutions In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-98). AAAI Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Longstaff D, Walker R, Walker RF, Jackway P (1995) Improving co-occurrence matrix feature discrimination. In Proc of DICTA’95 3rd International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications

  36. Mitchell T (1997) Machine learning. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Moldovanu S, Moraru L, Bibicu D (2012) Computerized decision support in liver steatosis investigation. Int J Biol Biomed Eng 6(1):69–76

    Google Scholar 

  38. Neogi N, Adhikari A, Roy M (2016) Anisotropy of the texture in the ultra-sonogram of human livers. In IEEE International Conference on Information Science, pp. 114–119

  39. Ogawa K, Fukushima M, Kubota K, Hisa N (1998) Computer-aided diagnostic system for diffuse liver diseases with ultra sonography by neural networks. IEEE Trans on Nuclear Science 45(6):3069–3074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Owjimehr M, Danyali H, Helfroush MS (2015) An improved method for liver diseases detection by ultrasound image analysis. J Med Signals Sensors 5(1):21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Patel MB, Rodriguez JJ, Gmitro AF (2008) Effect of gray-level re-quantization on co-occurrence based texture analysis. In 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing: 585–588

  42. Ribeiro R, Marinho RT, Sanches JM (2012) Global and local detection of liver steatosis from ultrasound. Annual International Conference in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE 28:6547–6550

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1988) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Cognitive Modelling 5(3):1

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Saba L, Dey N, Ashour AS, Samanta S, Nath SS, Chakraborty S, Sanches J, Kumar D, Marinho R, Suri JS (2016) Automated stratification of liver disease in ultrasound: an online accurate feature classification paradigm. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 130:118–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sabih D, Hussain M (2012) Automated classification of liver disorders using ultrasound images. J Med Syst 36(5):3163–3172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sharma G, ul Hussain S, Jurie F (2012) Local higher-order statistics (LHS) for texture categorization and facial analysis. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, Berlin, pp. 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  47. Singh M, Singh S, Gupta S (2012) A new quantitative metric for liver classification from ultrasound images. Int J of Computer and Electrical Eng 4(4):605–607

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Singh M, Singh S, Gupta S (2014) An information fusion based method for liver classification using texture analysis of ultrasound images. Inf Fusion19:91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Specht DF (1990) Probabilistic neural networks. Neural Netw 3(1):109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tamura H, Mori S, Yamawaki T (1978) Textural features corresponding to visual perception. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 8(6):460–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tou JY, Lau PY, Tay YH (2007) Computer vision-based wood recognition system. In Proceedings of International workshop on advanced image technology

  52. Valckx FM, Thijssen JM (1997) Characterization of echographic image texture by cooccurrence matrix parameters. Ultrasound Med Biol 23(4):559–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wan J, Zhou S (2010) Features extraction based on wavelet packet transform for B-mode ultrasound liver images. IEEE 3rd International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP) 2:949–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Welch BL (1947) The generalization of student's' problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34(1/2):28–35

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Yeh WC, Huang SW, Li PC (2003) Liver fibrosis grade classification with B-mode ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 29(9):1229–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Yu F, Wang D, Shelhamer E, Darrell T (2018) Learning Rich Image Representation with Deep Layer Aggregation, ICLR

  57. Zucker SW, Terzopoulos D (1980) Finding structure in co-occurrence matrices for texture analysis. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 12(3):286–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Suparna Majumdar, Department of Radio diagnosis, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata-700026, India for providing the USG of livers for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Meghnad Saha Institute of Technology, Kolkata, India

    Nivedita Neogi

  2. West Bengal State University, Barasat, India

    Arunabha Adhikari

  3. Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata, India

    Madhusudan Roy

Authors
  1. Nivedita Neogi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arunabha Adhikari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Madhusudan Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arunabha Adhikari.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neogi, N., Adhikari, A. & Roy, M. Use of a novel set of features based on texture anisotropy for identification of liver steatosis from ultrasound images: a simple method. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 11105–11127 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6675-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6675-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation