Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 77, Issue 20, pp 27181–27214 | Cite as

Hybrid blind robust image watermarking technique based on DFT-DCT and Arnold transform

  • Mohamed Hamidi
  • Mohamed El Haziti
  • Hocine Cherifi
  • Mohammed El Hassouni
Article

Abstract

In this paper, a robust blind image watermarking method is proposed for copyright protection of digital images. This hybrid method relies on combining two well-known transforms that are the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) and the discrete cosine transform (DCT). The motivation behind this combination is to enhance the imperceptibility and the robustness. The imperceptibility requirement is achieved by using magnitudes of DFT coefficients while the robustness improvement is ensured by applying DCT to the DFT coefficients magnitude. The watermark is embedded by modifying the coefficients of the middle band of the DCT using a secret key. The security of the proposed method is enhanced by applying Arnold transform (AT) to the watermark before embedding. Experiments were conducted on natural and textured images. Results show that, compared with state-of-the-art methods, the proposed method is robust to a wide range of attacks while preserving high imperceptibility.

Keywords

Image watermarking Copyright protection Hybrid method Discrete Fourier transform (DFT) Discrete cosine transform (DCT) Arnold transform 

References

  1. 1.
    Ali M, Ahn CW, Pant M (2014) A robust image watermarking technique using SVD and differential evolution in DCT domain. Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics 125(1):428–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barni M, Bartolini F, Piva A (2001) Improved wavelet-based watermarking through pixel-wise masking. IEEE Trans Image Process 10(5):783–791CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brodatz P (1966) Textures: a photographic album for artists and designers. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cedillo-Hernandez M, Garcia-Ugalde F, Nakano-Miyatake M, Perez-Meana H (2012) Robust digital image watermarking using interest points and DFT domain. In: 35th IEEE international conference on telecommunications and signal processing (TSP), pp 715–719Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cox IJ, Kilian J, Leighton F, Shamoon T (1997) Secure spread spectrum watermarking for multimedia. IEEE Trans Image Process 6(12):1673–1687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cox I, Miller M, Bloom J, Fridrich J, Kalker T (2007) Digital watermarking and steganography. Morgan Kaufmann, San MateoGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Das C, Panigrahi S, Sharma VK, Mahapatra KK (2014) A novel blind robust image watermarking in DCT domain using inter-block coefficient correlation. AEU-Int J Electron C 68(3):244–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dyson FJ, Falk H (1992) Period of a discrete cat mapping. Am Math Mon 99(7):603–614MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feng LP, Zheng LB, Cao P (2010) A DWT-DCT based blind watermarking algorithm for copyright protection. In: Third IEEE international conference on computer science and information technology (ICCSIT), vol 7, pp 455–458Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gangadhar Y, Akula VG, Reddy PC (2018) An evolutionary programming approach for securing medical images using watermarking scheme in invariant discrete wavelet transformation. Biomed Signal Process Control 43:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hsu CT, Wu JL (1999) Hidden digital watermarks in images. IEEE Trans Image Process 8(1):58–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jia SL (2014) A novel blind color images watermarking based on SVD. Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics 125(12):2868–2874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khayam SA (2003) The discrete cosine transform (DCT): theory and application. Michigan State University, p 114Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumar C, Singh AK, Kumar P (2018) A recent survey on image watermarking techniques and its application in e-governance. Multimed Tools Appl 77(3):3597–3622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kutter M, Petitcolas FA (1999) Fair benchmark for image watermarking systems. In: Electronic imaging, international society for optics and photonics, pp 226–239Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li M, Liang T, He YJ (2013) Arnold transform based image scrambling method. In: Third international conference on multimedia technologyGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin WH, Wang YR (2009) A wavelet-tree-based watermarking method using distance vector of binary cluster. Expert Systems with Applications 36(6):9869–9878MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu L, Cheng L, Liu Y, Jia Y, Rosenblum DS (2016) Recognizing complex activities by a probabilistic interval-based model. In: AAAI, vol 30, pp 1266–1272Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu Y, Nie L, Liu L, Rosenblum DS (2016) From action to activity: sensor-based activity recognition. Neurocomputing 181:108–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pereira S, Pun T (2000) Robust template matching for affine resistant image watermarks. IEEE Trans Image Process 9(6):1123–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Poljicak A, Mandic L, Agic D (2011) Discrete Fourier transform–based watermarking method with an optimal implementation radius. J Electron Imaging 20 (3):033008–033008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Press WH (1989) Numerical recipes in Pascal: the art of scientific computing, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Qi X, Xin X (2011) A quantization-based semi-fragile watermarking scheme for image content authentication. J Vis Commun Image Represent 22(2):187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roy S, Pal AK (2017) A robust blind hybrid image watermarking scheme in RDWT-DCT domain using Arnold scrambling. Multimed Tools Appl 76(3):3577–3616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saha BJ, Kabi KK, Pradhan C (2014) Non blind watermarking technique using enhanced one time pad in DWT domain. In: 2014 international conference on computing, communication and networking technologies (ICCCNT). IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sahraee MJ, Ghofrani S (2013) A robust blind watermarking method using quantization of distance between wavelet coefficients. Signal, Image and Video Processing 7(4):799–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Singh D, Singh SK (2017) DWT-SVD and DCT based robust and blind watermarking scheme for copyright protection. Multimed Tools Appl 76(11):13001–13024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Singh AK, Dave M, Mohan A (2014) Hybrid technique for robust and imperceptible image watermarking in DWT-DCT-SVD domain. Natl Acad Sci Lett 37 (4):351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Singh AK, Dave M, Mohan A (2016) Hybrid technique for robust and imperceptible multiple watermarking using medical images. Multimed Tools Appl 75 (14):8381–8401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Singh AK, Dave M, Mohan A (2015) Robust and secure multiple watermarking in wavelet domain. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics 5(2):406–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Singh AK, Kumar B, Dave M, Mohan A (2015) Robust and imperceptible dual watermarking for telemedicine applications. Wirel Pers Commun 80(4):1415–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Singh AK, Kumar B, Singh SK, Ghrera SP, Mohan A (2016) Multiple watermarking technique for securing online social network contents using Back Propagation Neural Network. Future Generat Comput Syst. Elsevier.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.11.023
  33. 33.
    Singh S, Rathore VS, Singh R (2017) Hybrid NSCT domain multiple watermarking for medical images. Multimed Tools Appl 76(3):3557–3575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Singh S, Rathore VS, Singh R, Singh MK (2017) Hybrid semi-blind image watermarking in redundant wavelet domain. Multimed Tools Appl 76(18):19113–19137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Singh AK, Kumar B, Singh G, Mohan A (eds) (2017) Medical image watermarking: techniques and applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Su Q, Chen B (2017) Robust color image watermarking technique in the spatial domain. Soft Comput 22(1):91–106MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Urvoy M, Goudia D, Autrusseau F (2014) Perceptual DFT watermarking with improved detection and robustness to geometrical distortions. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 9(7):1108–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang SH, Lin YP (2004) Wavelet tree quantization for copyright protection watermarking. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(2):154–165MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Weber AG (1997) The usc-sipi image database: http://sipi.usc.edu/services/database/Database.html. Signal and Image Processing Institute at the University of Southern California
  41. 41.
    Xiao D, Shih FY (2012) An improved hierarchical fragile watermarking scheme using chaotic sequence sorting and subblock post-processing. Opt Commun 285(10):2596–2606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zear A, Singh AK, Kumar P (2018) A proposed secure multiple watermarking technique based on DWT, DCT and SVD for application in medicine. Multimed Tools Appl 77(4):4863–4882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhang Q, Li Y, Wei X (2012) An improved robust and adaptive watermarking algorithm based on dct. Journal of Applied Research and Technology 10(3):405–415Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LRIT-CNRST URAC 29, Rabat IT Center, Faculty of SciencesMohammed V UniversityRabatMorocco
  2. 2.LRIT-CNRST URAC 29, Rabat IT Center, ESTMohammed V UniversityRabatMorocco
  3. 3.Laboratoire Electronique, Informatique et Image (Le2i) UMR 6306 CNRSUniversity of BurgundyDijonFrance
  4. 4.LRIT-CNRST URAC 29, Rabat IT Center, FLSHMohammed V UniversityRabatMorocco

Personalised recommendations