Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reversible data hiding method using meaningful encrypted images

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Encrypted image-based reversible data hiding methods have recently been introduced to conduct research on data encryption. In these methods, an image provider generates encrypted images that are supplied to a data sender. The data sender embeds secret data into the images in order to securely communicate with a data receiver. The data receiver can extract secret data and recover the cover image from the encrypted images. Past research has shown that attackers can easily become suspicious in such cases since all images are scrambled during communication. In this paper, we propose a reversible data hiding method that uses meaningful encrypted images. The proposed method is independent from image provider, data sender, and data receiver respectively by separating the images used and the secret data hidden from each other. In addition, the proposed method reduces distortion during image encryption, and features a data embedding scheme to conceal the existence of secret data from attackers. Experimental results show that the proposed method has high embedding capacity and yields satisfactory image quality with a meaningful image.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alattar M (2004) Reversible watermark using the difference expansion of a generalized integer transform. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(8):1147–1156

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Oershi OM, Khoo BE (2013) Two-dimensional difference expansion (2D-DE) scheme with a characteristics-based threshold. Signal Process 93:154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alsmirat MA, Jararweh Y, Obaidat I, Gupta BB (2017) Internet of surveillance: a cloud supported large scale wireless surveillance system. J Supercomput 73(3):973–992

  4. Alsmirat MA, Jararweh Y, Ayyoub M (2017) Accelerating compute intensive medical imaging segmentation algorithms using hybrid CPU-GPU implementations. Multimed Tools Appl 76(3):3537–3555

  5. Atawneh S, Almomani A, Bazar HA, Sumari P (2017) Secure and imperceptible digital image steganographic algorithm based on diamond encoding in DWT domain. Multimed Tools Appl 76(18):18451–18472

  6. Cao X, Du L, Wei X, Meng D (2016) High capacity reversible data hiding in encrypted images by patch-level sparse representation. IEEE Trans Cybern 46(5):1132–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan CK, Cheng LM (2004) Hiding data in images by simple LSB substitution. Pattern Recognit 37:469–474

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang CC, Lin MH, Hu YC (2002) A fast and secure image hiding scheme based on LSB substitution. Int J Pattern Recognit 16:399–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang KC, Huang PS, Tu TM, Chang CP (2007) Adaptive image steganographic scheme based on tri-way pixel-value differencing. IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp 1165-1170

  10. Chang KC, Huang PS, Tu TM, Chang CP (2007) Image steganographic scheme using try-way pixel-value differencing and adaptive rules. Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing, pp 449-452

  11. Chen YC, Shiu CW, Horng G (2014) Encrypted signal-based reversible data hiding with public key cryptosystem. J Vis Commun Image Represent 25:1164–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hong W, Chen TS, Wu HY (2012) An improved reversible data hiding in encrypted images using side match. Signal Process Lett 19(4):199–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hsiao JY, Chan KF, Chang JM (2009) Block-based reversible data embedding. Signal Process 89:556–569

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu J, Li T (2015) Reversible steganography using extended image interpolation technique. Comput Electr Eng Comput Electr Eng 46:447–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu Y, Lee HK, Li J (2009) DE-based reversible data hiding with improved overflow location map. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 19(2):250–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang HC, Chang FC (2013) Hierarchy-based reversible data hiding. Expert Syst Appl 40(1):34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang HC, Fang WC (2011) Authenticity preservation with histogram-based reversible data hiding and quadtree concepts. Sensors 11(10):9717–9731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang LC, Tseng LY, Hwang MS (2013) A reversible data hiding method by histogram shifting in high quality medical images. J Syst Softw 86:716–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jana B (2016) High payload reversible data hiding scheme using weighted matrix. Optik 127:3347–3358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jung KH, Yoo KY (2009) Data hiding method using image interpolation. Comput Stand Interfaces 31(2):465–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ker A (2005) Steganalysis of LSB matching in grayscale images. IEEE Signal Process Lett 12:441–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khodaei M, Faez K (2012) New adaptive steganographic method using least-significant-bit substation and pixel-value differencing. IET Image Process 6(5):677–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee CF, Chen HC (2012) Adjustable prediction-based reversible data hiding. Digital Signal Process 22(6):941–953

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee CF, Huang YL (2012) An efficient image interpolation increasing payload in reversible data hiding. Expert Syst Appl 39(8):6712–6719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee YP, Lee JC, Chen WK, Chang KC, Su IJ, Chang CP (2012) High-payload image hiding with quality recovery using tri-way pixel-value differencing. Inform Sci 191:214–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li X, Yang B, Zeng T (2011) Efficient reversible data watermarking based on adaptive prediction-error expansion and pixel selection. IEEE Trans Image Process 20(12):3524–3533

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Li X, Li J, Li B, Yang B (2013) High-fidelity reversible data hiding scheme based on pixel-value-ordering and prediction-error expansion. Signal Process 93:198–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liao X, Wen QY, Zhang J (2011) A steganographic method for digital images with four-pixel differencing and modified LSB substitution. J Vis Commun Image Represent 22:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin CC, Tai WL, Chang CC (2008) Multilevel reversible data hiding based on histogram modification of difference images. Pattern Recognit 41:3582–3591

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu L, Chen T, Zhu S, Hong W, Si X (2016) A reversible data hiding method using improved neighbor mean interpolation and random-block division. Inf Technol J 13:2374–2384

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lu TC (2017) An interpolation-based lossless hiding scheme based on message recoding mechanism. Optik 130:1377–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lu TC, Chang CC, Huang YH (2014) High capacity reversible hiding scheme based on interpolation, difference expansion and histogram methods. Multimedia Tools and Applications 72:417–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lu TC, Tseng CY, Wu JH (2015) Dual imaging-based reversible hiding technique using LSB matching. Signal Process 108:77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lu TC, Lin MC, Huang CC, Deng KM (2016) Reversible data hiding based on image interpolation with a secret message reduction strategy. Int J Comput Softw Eng 1:102–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Luo H, Yu FX, Chen H, Huang ZL, Li H, Wang PH (2011) Reversible data hiding based on block median preservation. Inform Sci 181:308–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ma K, Zhang W, Zhao X (2013) Reversible data hiding in encrypted images by reserving room before encryption. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 8(3):553–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Malik A, Sikka G, Verma HK (2017) An image interpolation based reversible data hiding scheme using pixel value adjusting feature. Multimed Tools Appl 76(11):13025–13046

  38. Marin J, Shih FY (2014) Reversible data hiding techniques using multiple scanning difference value histogram modification. J Inf Hiding Multimedia Signal Process 5(3):451–460

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mielikainen J (2006) LSB matching revisited. IEEE Signal Process Lett 13:285–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Z. Ni, Y. Q. Shi, N. Ansari, and W. Su. (2003) Reversible data hiding. Proc. of International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pp. 912-915

  41. Qian Z, Zhang X (2016) Reversible data hiding in encrypted images with distributed source encoding. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 26(4):636–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sabeen GPV, Sajila MK, Bindiya MV (2016) A two stage data hiding scheme with high capacity based on interpolation and difference expansion. Procedia Technol 24:1311–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tang M, Hu J, Song W, Zeng S (1745-1754) Reversible and adaptive image steganographic method. AEU Int J Electron Commun 69(12):2015

    Google Scholar 

  44. Thodi DM, Rodriguez JJ (2007) Expansion embedding techniques for reversible watermarking. IEEE Trans Image Process 16(3):721–730

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Tian J (2003) Reversible data embedding using a difference expansion. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 13(8):890–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tsai YY, Chen JT, Kuo YC, Chan CS (2014) A generalized image interpolation-based reversible data hiding scheme with high embedding capacity and image quality. KSII Trans Internet Inf Syst 8(9):3286–3301

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wang RZ, Lin CF, Lin JC (2001) Image hiding by optimal LSB substitution and genetic algorithm. Pattern Recognit 34:671–683

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang CM, Wu NI, Tsai CS, Hwang MS (2008) A high quality steganographic method with pixel-value differencing and modulus function. J Syst Softw 81:150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Weng SW, Pan JS (2014) Reversible watermarking based on eight improved prediction modes. J Inf Hiding Multimedia Signal Process 5(3):527–533

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wu DC, Tsai WH (2003) A steganographic method for images by pixel-value differencing. Pattern Recogn Lett 24:1613–1626

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Wu NI, Wu KC, Wang CM (2002) Exploring pixel-value differencing and base decomposition for low distortion data embedding. Appl Soft Comput 12:942–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wu HC, Wu NI, Tsai CS, Hwang MS (2005) Image steganographic scheme based on pixel-value differencing and LSB replacement methods. IEE Processing Visualization, Image Signal Process 152:611–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yang CH, Weng CY (2006) A steganographic method for digital images by multi-pixel differencing. IEE International Computer Symposium, pp 831-836

  54. Yang CN, Hsu SC, Kim C (2017) Improving stego image quality in image interpolation based data hiding. Comput Stand Interfaces 50:209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang X (2011) Reversible data hiding in encrypted images. IEEE Signal Process Lett 18(4):255–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang X (2012) Separable reversible data hiding in encrypted image. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 7(2):826–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhao Z, Luo H, Lu ZM, Pan JS (2011) Reversible data hiding based on multilevel histogram modification and sequential recovery. AEU Int J Electron Commun 65(10):814–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to anonymous reviewers for useful suggestions.

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2015R1D1A1A01058019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Technology Development, Gyeongju Smart Media Center, 587-18 Gyeonggam-ro, Gyeongju-si, Gyeongbuk, 38118, Republic of Korea

    Sang-Ho Shin

  2. Department of Cyber Security, Kyungil University, 50 Gamasil-gil, Hayang-eup, Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongbuk, 38428, Republic of Korea

    Ki-Hyun Jung

Authors
  1. Sang-Ho Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ki-Hyun Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ki-Hyun Jung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, SH., Jung, KH. Reversible data hiding method using meaningful encrypted images. Multimed Tools Appl 77, 14841–14857 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5065-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5065-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation