Abstract
To ensure highest security in handheld devices, biometric authentication has emerged as a reliable methodology. Deployment of mobile biometric authentication struggles due to computational complexity. For a fast response from a mobile biometric authentication method, it is desired that the feature extraction and matching should take least time. In this article, the periocular region captured through frontal camera of a mobile device is considered under investigation for its suitability to produce a reduced feature that takes least time for feature extraction and matching. A recently developed feature Phase Intensive Local Pattern (PILP) is subjected to reduction giving birth to a feature termed as Reduced PILP (R-PILP), which yields a matching time speed-up of 1.56 times while the vector is 20% reduced without much loss in authentication accuracy. The same is supported by experiment on four publicly available databases. The performance is also compared with one global feature: Phase Intensive Global Pattern, and three local features: Scale Invariant Feature Transform, Speeded-up Robust Features, and PILP. The amount of reduction can be varied with the requirement of the system. The amount of reduction and the performance of the system bears a trade-off. Proposed R-PILP attempts to make periocular suitable for mobile devices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams J, Woodard DL, Dozier G, Miller PE, Bryant K, Glenn G (2010) Genetic - based type II feature extraction for periocular biometric recognition: less is more. In: 20th international conference on pattern recognition (ICPR), pp 205–208. doi:10.1109/ICPR.2010.59
Ahuja K, Islam R, Barbhuiya FA, Dey K (2017) Convolutional neural networks for ocular smartphone-based biometrics. Pattern Recogn Lett 91:17–26. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2017.04.002
Bakshi S, Sa PK, Majhi B (2014) Phase intensive global pattern for periocular recognition. In: Proceedings of the the 11th IEEE India conference (INDICON). doi:10.1109/INDICON.2014.7030362
Bakshi S, Sa PK, Majhi B (2015) A novel phase-intensive local pattern for periocular recognition under visible spectrum. Biocybernetics Biomed Eng 35(1):30–44. doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2014.05.003
BATH University database. http://www.bath.ac.uk/elec-eng/research/sipg/irisweb, last accessed on 4.4.2016
Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, Gool LV (2008) Speeded-up robust features (SURF). Comput Vis Image Underst 110(3):346–359. doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014
CASIA Database. http://www.cbsr.ia.ac.cn/english/irisdatabase.asp, last accessed on 4.4.2016
Hollingsworth KP, Bowyer KW, Flynn PJ (2010) Identifying useful features for recognition in near-infrared periocular images. In: 4th IEEE international conference on biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS). doi:10.1109/BTAS.2010.5634529
Hollingsworth KP, Darnell SS, Miller PE, Woodard DL, Bowyer KW, Flynn PJ (2010) Human and machine performance on periocular biometrics under near-infrared light and visible light. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 7:588–601. doi:10.1109/TIFS.2011.2173932
Jain AK, Flynn P, Ross A (2008) Handbook of biometrics. Springer. ISBN : 978-0-387-71040-2
Juefei-Xu F, Cha M, Heyman J, Venugopalan S, Abiantun R, Savvides M (2010) Robust local binary pattern feature sets for periocular biometric identification. In: 4th IEEE international conference on biometrics: theory, applications, and systems (BTAS). doi:10.1109/BTAS.2010.5634504
Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60(2):91–110. doi:10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94
Lu C, Lu Z (2008) Local feature extraction for iris recognition with automatic scale selection. Image Vis Comput 26(7):935–940. doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2007.10.011
Mahalingam G, Ricanek Jr K (2013) LBP-Based periocular recognition on challenging face datasets. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, 36. doi:10.1186/1687-5281-2013-36
Miller PE, Lyle JR, Pundlik SJ, Woodard DL (2010) Performance evaluation of local appearance based periocular recognition. In: 4th IEEE international conference on biometrics: theory, applications and systems (BTAS). doi:10.1109/BTAS.2010.5634536
Miller PE, Rawls AW, Pundlik SJ (2010) Personal identification using periocular skin texture. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM symposium on applied computing (SAC ’10), pp 1496–1500. doi:10.1145/1774088.1774408
Oh K, Oh B-S, Toh K-A, Yau W-Y, Eng H-L (2014) Combining sclera and periocular features for multi-modal identity verification. Neurocomputing 128:185–198. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2013.01.066
Ojala T, Pietikäinen M, Harwood D (1996) A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 29(1):51–59. doi:10.1016/0031-3203(95)00067-4
Padole CN, Proenca H (2012) Periocular recognition: analysis of performance degradation factors. In: 5Th IAPR international conference on biometrics (ICB), pp 439–445. doi:10.1109/ICB.2012.6199790
Park U, Ross A, Jain AK (2009) Periocular biometrics in the visible spectrum: a feasibility study. In: IEEE 3rd international conference on biometrics: theory, applications and systems (BTAS). doi:10.1109/BTAS.2009.5339068
Patel B, Maheshwari RP, Raman B (2017) Evaluation of periocular features for kinship verification in the wild. Comput Vis Image Underst. doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2017.04.009
Phillips JP, Moon H, Rizvi SA, Rauss PJ (2000) The FERET evaluation methodology for face-recognition algorithms. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22 (10):1090–1104. doi:10.1109/34.879790
Proenca H, Alexandre LA (2005) UBIRIS: a noisy iris image database. In: 13Th international conference on image analysis and processing (ICIAP 2005), pp 970–977. doi:10.1007/11553595_119
Proenca H, Alexandre LA (2007) Toward non-cooperative iris recognition: a classification approach using multiple signatures. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 29(4):607–612. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2007.1016
Proenca H, Filipe S, Santos R, Oliveira J, Alexandre LA (2010) The UBIRIS.v2: a database of visible wavelength iris images captured on-the-move and at-a-distance. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(8):1529–1535. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2009.66
Santos G, Grancho E, Bernardo MV, Fiadeiro PT (2014) Fusing iris and periocular information for cross-sensor recognition. Pattern Recogn Lett. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2014.09.012
Uzair M, Mahmood A, Mian A, McDonald C (2013) A compact discriminative representation for efficient image-set classification with application to biometric recognition. In: 6th IAPR international conference on biometrics (ICB). doi:10.1109/ICB.2013.6612959
Vatsa M, Singh R, Noore A (2008) Improving iris recognition performance using segmentation, quality enhancement, match score fusion, and indexing. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 38(4):1021–1035. doi:10.1109/TSMCB.2008.922059
Woodard DL, Pundlik SJ, Miller PE (2010) On the fusion of periocular and iris biometrics in non-ideal imagery. In: 20Th international conference on pattern recognition (ICPR), pp 201–204. doi:10.1109/ICPR.2010.58
Woodard DL, Pundlik SJ, Miller PE, Lyle JR (2011) Appearance - based periocular features in the context of face and non-ideal iris recognition. J Signal Image Video Process 5(4):443–455. doi:10.1007/s11760-011-0248-2
Zhao Z, Kumar A (2017) Accurate periocular recognition under less constrained environment using semantics-assisted convolutional neural network. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 12(5):1017–1030. doi:10.1109/TIFS.2016.2636093
Acknowledgment
The research is funded by Grant no. 12(5)/2012-ESD by Department of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India. This research is an extension to:
S. Bakshi, P.K. Sa, and B. Majhi. A Novel Phase-intensive Local Pattern for Periocular Recognition under Visible Spectrum. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering 35(1):30–44, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2014.05.003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bakshi, S., Sa, P.K., Wang, H. et al. Fast periocular authentication in handheld devices with reduced phase intensive local pattern. Multimed Tools Appl 77, 17595–17623 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4965-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4965-6