Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 75, Issue 16, pp 9757–9774 | Cite as

Automatic footprint detection approach for the calculation of arch index and plantar pressure in a flat rubber pad

  • Ke-Han Su
  • Thossaporn Kaewwichit
  • Chien-Hsun Tseng
  • Chong-Ching ChangEmail author
Article

Abstract

To obtain the Arch Index (AI) of footprint, the operation process through a Flat Rubber Pad (FRP) is manually time consuming to realize the necessary foot contact area. To deal with the problem, this paper developed an automatic footprint detection approach by employing the Otsu’s thresholding method and the three components of HSV color space to segment the foot contact boundary in a footprint image. In addition, the ink density pattern of the FRP footprint image represents the pressure with a qualitative description of plantar pressure; the higher the ink density, the higher the pressure. Based on the principle, this paper examined the relationship between the intensity of the gray footprint image and body weight so as to quantify the magnitude of plantar pressures. Therefore, the depths of ink on the footprint image are used for plantar pressure calculation. The experiments verified that the proposed approach incorporated with the FRP can simultaneously obtain both the arch index and the plantar pressure with better accuracy when compared with other existing methods. The advantages of the developed approach with the FRP are that it can help reduce operating time and cost, and automatically obtain the foot contact area for further foot-related calculation without clinical expertise.

Keyword

Flat rubber pad Automatic footprint detection Plantar pressure Arch index 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China, Taiwan, for support of this research under Grant Nos. NSC101-2221-E-024-002 and MOST 103-2221-E-415 -031. In particular, the authors would like to thank Dr. Prapai Jantrasakul for her assistance in English writing.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdul Razak AH, Zayegh A, Begg RK, Wahab Y (2012) Foot plantar pressure measurement system: A review. Sensors 12(7):9884–9912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bird AR, Payne CB (1999) Foot function and low back pain. Foot 9(4):175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bus SA, Ulbrecht JS, Cavanagh PR (2004) Pressure relief and load redistribution by custom-made insoles in diabetic patients with neuropathy and foot deformity. Clin Biomech 19(6):629–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM (1987) The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. J Biomech 20:547–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chae SH, Moon HM, Chung Y, Shin J, Pan SB (2014) Automatic lung segmentation for large-scale medical image management. Multimedia Tools Appl. doi: 10.1007/s11042-014-2201-1 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen W, Shi YQ, Xuan G (2007) Identifying computer graphics using HSV color model and statistical moments of characteristic functions. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. 1123–1126Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheng HD, Jiang XH, Sun Y, Wang J (2001) Color image segmentation: advances and prospects. Pattern recognition. Pattern Recogn 34(12):2259–2281CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chevalier TL H, Hodgins H, Chockalingam N (2010) Plantar pressure measurements using an in-shoe system and a pressure platform: A comparison. Gait Posture 31(3):397–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chevalier TL, Hodgins H, Chockalingam N (2010) Plantar pressure measurements using an in-shoe system and a pressure platform: A comparison. Gait Posture 31(3):397–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chuckpaiwong B, Nunley JA, Mall NA, Queen RM (2008) The effect of foot type on in-shoe plantar pressure during walking and running. Gait Posture 28(3):405–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Franco AH (1987) Pes cavus and pes planus analyses and treatment. Phys Ther 67(5):688–694Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gross KD, Felson DT, Niu J, Hunter DJ, Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Dufour AB, Gensure RH, Hannan MT (2011) Association of flat feet with knee pain and cartilage damage in older adults. Arthritis Care Res 63(7):937–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hessert MJ, Vyas M, Leach J, Hu K, Lipsitz LA, Novak V (2005) Foot pressure distribution during walking in young and old adults. BMC Geriatr 5(1):8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hills AP, Hennig EM, McDonald M, Bar-Or O (2001) Plantar pressure differences between obese and non-obese adults: a biomechanical analysis. J Int Assoc Study Obes 25(11):1674–1679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang CN, Lee MY, Chang CC (2011) Computer-aided design and manufacturing of customized insoles. Comput Graph Appl IEEE 31:74–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jonely H, Brismée JM, Sizer PS Jr, James CR (2011) Relationships between clinical measures of static foot posture and plantar pressure during static standing and walking. Clin Biomech 26(8):873–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kellis E (2001) Plantar pressure distribution during barefoot standing, walking and landing in preschool boys. Gait Posture 14(2):92–97MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin XL, Zhong W, Zhong WX (2009) Research of double-threshold segmentation of brazing-area defect of saw based on Otsu and HSV color space. In: International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, CISP’09. 2nd, IEEE 1–4Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lopes NV, Couto PA M d, Bustince H, Melo-Pinto P (2010) Automatic histogram threshold using fuzzy measures. Image Process IEEE Trans 19(1):199–204MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luccheseyz L, Mitray SK (2001) Color image segmentation: A state-of-the-art survey. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad (INSA-A) 67(2):207–221Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mathieson I, Upton D, Birchenough A (1999) Comparison of footprint parameters calculated from static and dynamic footprints. Foot 9(3):145–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McCrory JL, Young MJ, Boulton AJM, Cavanagh PR (1997) Arch index as a predictor of arch height. Foot 7(2):79–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Menz HB, Fotoohabadi MR, Wee E, Spink MJ (2012) Visual categorisation of the arch index: a simplified measure of foot posture in older people. J Foot Ankle Res 5(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mora M, Sbarbaro D (2005) A robust footprint detection using color images and neural networks. In Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis and Applications 311–318Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nigg BM, Cole GK, Nachbauer W (1993) Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running. J Biomech 26:909–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Otsu N (1975) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. Automatica, 23–27Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Razeghi M, Batt ME (2002) Foot type classification: a critical review of current methods. Gait Posture 15(3):282–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Riaz S, Lee SW (2013) A robust multimedia authentication and restoration scheme in digital photography. Multimedia Tools Appl 73(4):1–31Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sahoo PK, Soltani SAKC, Wong AK (1988) A survey of thresholding techniques. Comp Vision Graph Image Process 41(2):233–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sezgin M (2004) Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation. J Electron imaging 13(1):146–168MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tizhoosh HR (2005) Image thresholding using type II fuzzy sets. Pattern Recogn 31(12):2363–2372CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Urry SR, Wearing SC (2001) The accuracy of footprint contact area measurements: relevance to the design and performance of pressure platforms. Foot 11(3):151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Urry SR, Wearing SC (2001) A comparison of footprint indexes calculated from ink and electronic footprints. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 91(4):203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Urry SR, Wearing SC (2005) Arch indexes from ink footprints and pressure platforms are different. J Biomech 15:68–73Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ke-Han Su
    • 1
  • Thossaporn Kaewwichit
    • 2
  • Chien-Hsun Tseng
    • 3
  • Chong-Ching Chang
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Energy EngineeringNational Chiayi UniversityChiayi CityRepublic of China
  2. 2.Graduate Institute of Mechatronic System EngineeringNational University of TainanTainanRepublic of China
  3. 3.Department of Information EngineeringKun Shan UniversityTainanRepublic of China

Personalised recommendations