Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 74, Issue 16, pp 6365–6377 | Cite as

A strongly secure pairing-free certificateless authenticated key agreement protocol suitable for smart media and mobile environments

  • Hang Tu
  • Neeraj Kumar
  • Jongsung Kim
  • Jungtaek Seo
Article
  • 311 Downloads

Abstract

The authenticated key agreement (AKA) protocol is an important cryptographic mechanism, which allows two users to establish a session key for future communication. Recently, the certificateless public key cryptography received wide attention since it could solve the certificate management problem in the traditional public key cryptography and solve the key escrow problem in the identity-based public key cryptography. In this paper, we present a strongly secure certificateless authenticated key agreement (CLAKA) protocol without pairing suitable for smart media and mobile environments, which is provably secure in the extended Canetti–Krawczyk (eCK) model and is secure as long as each party has at least one uncompromised secret. Compared with previous CLAKA protocols, our protocol has advantages over them in security or efficiency.

Keywords

Certificateless cryptography Authenticated key agreement Provable security Bilinear pairings Elliptic curve 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (grant number 2013R1A1A2059864).

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Riyami S, Paterson KG (2003) Certificateless public key cryptography. In: Proc. of ASIACRYPT 2003, LNCS 2894, Springer-Verlag, pp 452–473Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bellare M, Pointcheval D, Rogaway P (2000) Authenticated key exchange secure against dictionary attacks. In: Proc.of the EUROCRYPT 2000. LNCS, Springer-Verlag, Vol. 1807, pp 139–55Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bellare M, Rogaway P (1993) Entity authentication and key distribution. In: Proc. of the CRYPTO 1993. LNCS, Springer-Verlag, Vol. 773, pp 232–49Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bellare M, Rogaway P (1995) Provably secure session key distribution: the three party case. In: Proc. of the 27th ACM symposium on the theory of computing, ACM, pp 57–66Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Canetti R, Krawczyk H (2001) Analysis of key-exchange protocols and their use for building secure channels. In: Proc. of the EUROCRYPT 2001. LNCS, Springer-Verlag, Vol. 245, pp 453–74Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cao X, Kou W (2010) A pairing-free identity-based authenticated Key agreement scheme with minimal message exchanges. Inf Sci 180:2895–2903MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen L, Cheng Z, Smart NP (2007) Identity-based key agreement protocols from pairings. Int J Inf Secur 6:213–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geng M, Zhang F (2009) Provably secure certificateless two-party authenticated key agreement protocol without pairing. In: Proc. of International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, pp 208–212Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    He D, Chen Y, Chen J, Zhang R, Han W (2011) A new two-round certificateless authenticated key agreement protocol without bilinear pairings. Math Comput Model 54(11–12):3143–3152MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    He D, Chen J, Hu J (2012) A pairing-free certificateless authenticated key agreement protocol. Int J Commun Syst 25(2):221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    He D, Padhye S, Chen J (2012) An efficient certificateless authenticated key agreement protocol. Comput Math Appl 64(6):1914–1926MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hou M, Xu Q (2009) A two-party certificateless authenticated key agreement protocol without pairing. In: Proc. of 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, pp 412–416Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    LaMacchia BA, Lauter K, Mityagin A (2007) Stronger security of authenticated key exchange. In: Proc. of the ProvSection 2007. LNCS, Springer-Verlag , Vol. 4784, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lippold G, Boyd C, Nieto J (2009) Strongly secure certificateless key agreement. In: Pairing 2009, pp 206–230Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mandt T, Tan C (2008) Certificateless authenticated two-party key agreement protocols. In: Proc. of the ASIAN 2006, LNCS, Springer-Verlag, Vol. 4435, pp 37–44Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ni L, Chen G, Li J, Hao Y (2011) Strongly secure identity-based authenticated key agreement protocols. Comput Electr Eng 37:205–217MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shamir A (1984) Identity-based cryptosystems and signature protocols. Proc. CRYPTO1984, LNCS, Vol. 196, pp 47–53Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shao Z (2005) Efficient authenticated key agreement protocol using self-certifed public keys from pairings. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 10(1):267–270MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shi Y, Li J (2007) Two-party authenticated key agreement in certificateless public key cryptography. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 12(1):71–74MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Swanson C (2008) Security in key agreement: Two-party certificateless protocols, Master Thesis, University of WaterlooGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang S, Cao Z, Dong X (2006) Certificateless authenticated key agreement based on the MTI/CO protocol. J Inf Comput Sci 3:575–581Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang G, Tan C (2011) Strongly secure certificateless key exchange without pairing. In: Proc. of 6th ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security, pp 71–79Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang L, Zhang F, Wua Q, Domingo-Ferrer J (2010) Simulatable certificateless two-party authenticated key agreement protocol. Inf Sci 180:1020–1030MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hang Tu
    • 1
  • Neeraj Kumar
    • 2
  • Jongsung Kim
    • 3
  • Jungtaek Seo
    • 4
  1. 1.School of ComputerWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringThapar UniversityPatialaIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics and Department of Financial Information Security (BK21 Plus Future Financial Information Security Specialist Education Group)Kookmin UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  4. 4.National Security Research Institute (NSRI)DaejeonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations