Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 75, Issue 2, pp 1201–1221 | Cite as

Towards automated visual surveillance using gait for identity recognition and tracking across multiple non-intersecting cameras



Despite the fact that personal privacy has become a major concern, surveillance technology is now becoming ubiquitous in modern society. This is mainly due to the increasing number of crimes as well as the essential necessity to provide secure and safer environment. Recent research studies have confirmed now the possibility of recognizing people by the way they walk i.e. gait. The aim of this research study is to investigate the use of gait for people detection as well as identification across different cameras. We present a new approach for people tracking and identification between different non-intersecting un-calibrated stationary cameras based on gait analysis. A vision-based markerless extraction method is being deployed for the derivation of gait kinematics as well as anthropometric measurements in order to produce a gait signature. The novelty of our approach is motivated by the recent research in biometrics and forensic analysis using gait. The experimental results affirmed the robustness of our approach to successfully detect walking people as well as its potency to extract gait features for different camera viewpoints achieving an identity recognition rate of 73.6 % processed for 2270 video sequences. Furthermore, experimental results confirmed the potential of the proposed method for identity tracking in real surveillance systems to recognize walking individuals across different views with an average recognition rate of 92.5 % for cross-camera matching for two different non-overlapping views.


Gait analysis Gait biometrics Markerless extraction 


  1. 1.
    Bashir K, Xiang T, Gong S (2010) Cross view gait recognition using correlation strength. In: British Machine Vision ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    BenAbdelkader C, Cutler R, Davis L (2002) Stride and Cadence as a Biometric in Automatic Person Identification and Verification. In: Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, pp 357–362Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    BenAbdelkader C, Cutler R, Davis L (2002) View-invariant Estimation of Height and Stride for Gait Recognition. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Biometric AuthenticationGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bouchrika I (2008) Gait analysis and recognition for automated visual surveillance. University of Southampton. Ph.D. thesisGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bouchrika I, Carter J, Nixon M (2009) Recognizing People in Non-Intersecting Camera Views. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Imaging for Crime Detection and PreventionGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cai Q, Aggarwal J, Inc R, Seattle W (1999) Tracking human motion in structured environments using adistributed-camera system. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 21(11):1241–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carter JN, Nixon MS (1999) Measuring gait signatures which are invariant to their trajectory. Measurement Control 32(9):265–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chowdhury A, Kale A, Kale A (2003) Towards a view invariant gait recognition algorithm. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance. Citeseer, pp 143–150Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cunado D, Nixon MS, Carter J (1997) Using gait as a Biometric, via Phase-Weighted Magnitude Spectra. In: Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Audio-and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, pp 95–102Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cunado D, Nixon MS, Carter JN (2003) Automatic Extraction and Description of Human Gait Models for Recognition Purposes. Comp Vision Image Underst 90(1):1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cutler R, Davis LS (2003) Robust real-time periodic motion detection, analysis, and applications. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(8):781–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    CVG (2001) Pets: Performance evaluation of tracking and surveillance.
  13. 13.
    Dempster WT, Gaughran GR (1967) Properties of body segments based on size and weight. Am J Anat 120(1):33–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fujiyoshi H, Lipton AJ, Kanade T (2004) Real-time human motion analysis by image skeletonization. IEICE Trans Information System:113–120Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goffredo M, Bouchrika I, Carter J, Nixon M (2009) Self-Calibrating View-invariant Gait Biometrics. In: Journal of IEEE Transaction Systems, Man, and Cybernetics BGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goffredo M, Bouchrika I, Carter JN, Nixon MS (2010) Performance analysis for automated gait extraction and recognition in multi-camera surveillance. Multimedia Tools Appl 50(1):75–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guan Y, Li CT, Hu Y (2012) Robust clothing-invariant gait recognition. In: International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing. IEEE, pp 321–324Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hadid A, Ghahramani M, Bustard J, Nixon M (2013) Improving gait biometrics under spoofing attacks. In: Image Analysis and Processing 2013. Springer, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Haritaoglu I, Harwood D, Davis LS (2000) W4: real-time surveillance of people and their activities. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(8):809–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Havasi L, Szlávik Z, Szirányi T (2007) Detection of gait characteristics for scene registration in video surveillance system. Image Processing. IEEE Transactions on 16(2):503–510Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    HOSD (2009) i-lids-imagery library for intelligent detection systems.
  22. 22.
    Huang PS, Harris CJ, Nixon MS (1999) Human Gait Recognition in Canonical Space using Temporal Templates. In: IEE Proceedings of Vision, Image and Signal Processing, vol 146, pp 93–100Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Javed O, Shah M (2002) Tracking and object classification for automated surveillance. In: Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer Vision, vol 4, pp 343–357Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Johansson G (1973) Visual Perception of Biological Motion and a Model for its Analysis. Percept Psychophys 14:201–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Katiyar R, Pathak VK, Arya K (2013) A study on existing gait biometrics approaches and challenges. Int J Comput Sci Issues 10 (1)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khan S, Javed O, Rasheed Z, Shah M (2001) Human tracking in multiple cameras. In: Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2001. ICCV 2001. Proceedings, vol 1Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim IS, Choi HS, Yi KM, Choi JY, Kong SG (2010) Intelligent visual surveillancea survey. Int J Control Autom Syst 8(5):926–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kusakunniran W, Wu Q, Zhang J, Ma Y, Li H (2013) A new view-invariant feature for cross-view gait recognition. Information Forensics and Security. IEEE Trans on 8(10):1642–1653Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lipton AJ, Fujiyoshi H, Patil RS (1998) Moving target classification and tracking from real-time video. 4th IEEE Workshop on Application of Computer VisionGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mori G, Malik J (2006) Recovering 3d human body configurations using shape contexts. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28(7):1052–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Morzinger R, Thaler M, Stalder S, Grabner H, Van Gool L (2011) Improved person detection in industrial environments using multiple self-calibrated cameras. In: Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance (AVSS), 2011 8th IEEE International Conference on, pp 486–491. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Murray MP (1967) Gait as a Total Pattern of Movement. Am J Phys Med 46(1):290–333Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nixon MS, Bouchrika I, Arbab-Zavar B, Carter JN (2010) On use of biometrics in forensics: gait and ear. In: European Signal Processing ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nixon MS, Tan TN, Chellappa R (2005) Human Identification Based on Gait. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Oren M, Papageorgiou C, Sinha P, Osuna E, Poggio T (1997) Pedestrian detection using wavelet templates. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 193–199Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Orwell J, Remagnino P, Jones G (1999) Multi-camera colour tracking. In: Second IEEE Workshop on Visual Surveillance, pp 14–21Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Phillips PJ, Moon H, Rizvi SA, Rauss PJ (2000) The FERET Evaluation Methodology for Face Recognition Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22(10):1090–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shutler J, Grant M, Nixon MS, Carter JN (2002) On a Large Sequence-Based Human Gait Database. In: Proceedings of Recent Advances in Soft Computing, pp 66–71Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Somol P, Pudil P, Novoviċová J, Paclík P (1999) Adaptive Floating Search Methods in Feature Selection. Pattern Recogn Lett 20(11–13):1157–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Spencer N, Carter JN (2005) Towards Pose Invariant Gait Reconstruction. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, vol 3Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stein G (1999) Tracking from multiple view points: Self-calibration of space and time. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol 1, pp 521–527Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Viola P, Jones MJ, Snow D (2005) Detecting pedestrians using patterns of motion and appearance. Int J Comput Vis 63(2):153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang L, Hu W, Tan T (2003) Recent Developments in Human Motion Analysis. Pattern Recog 36(3):585–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wang L, Ning H, Tan T, Hu W (2004) Fusion of Static and Dynamic Body Biometrics for Gait Recognition. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 14(2):149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yam CY, Nixon MS, Carter JN (2004) Automated Person Recognition by Walking and Running via Model-Based Approaches. Pattern Recog 37(5):1057–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yu S, Tan D, Tan T (2006) A framework for evaluating the effect of view angle, clothing and carrying condition on gait recognition. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol 4, pp 441–444Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imed Bouchrika
    • 1
  • John N. Carter
    • 2
  • Mark S. Nixon
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Souk-AhrasSouk-AhrasAlgeria
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and Computer ScienceUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations