Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 74, Issue 16, pp 6273–6286 | Cite as

Effective object segmentation based on physical theory in an MR image

  • Sung-Jong Eun
  • Hyeonjin Kim
  • Jung-Wook Park
  • Taeg-Keun WhangboEmail author
Article

Abstract

Object recognition is usually processed based on region segmentation algorithm. Region segmentation in the IT field is carried out by computerized processing of various input information such as brightness, shape, and pattern analysis. If the information mentioned does not make sense, however, many limitations could occur with region segmentation during computer processing. Therefore, this paper suggests effective object segmentation method based on R2 information within the magnetic resonance (MR) theory. In this study, the experiment had been conducted using images including the liver region and by setting up feature points of R2 map as seed points for region growing to enable region segmentation even when the border line was not clear. As a result, an average area difference of 7.5 %, which was higher than the accuracy of conventional region segmentation algorithm, was obtained.

Keywords

MR image Object segmentation R2 map SWI 3D region growing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by MSIP (the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning), Korea, under the IT-CRSP (IT Convergence Research Support Program) (NIPA-2013-H0401-13-1001), supervised by the NIPA (National IT Industry Promotion Agency); and by a grant from the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project of the Ministry of Health and Wealth of the Republic of Korea (A080369).

References

  1. 1.
    Arie Kaufman (1991) “Introduction to Volume Visualization.,” A. Kaufman(ed.), Computer Society PressGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baba N, Ichse N, Tanaka T (1996) Image area extraction of biological objects from a thin section image by statistical texture analysis. Electron Microse 45:298–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhalla M, Naidich DP, McGuinness G, Gruden JF, Leitman BS, McCauley DI (1996) Diffuse lung disease : assessment with helical CT -preliminary observations of the role of maximum and minimum intensity projection images. Radiology 200:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calhoun PS, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Carley JC, Fishman EK (1999) Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data : theory and method. RadioGraphics 19:745–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Catmull E, Rom R (1974) “A class of local interpolating splines,” Computer Aided Geometric Design, pp.317–326Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chande B, Dutta Majumder D (1988) “A note on the graylevel co-occurrence matrix in threshold selection”, Signal Processing, 15(2)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Damadian RV (1971) Science 171:1151–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Graaf RA, Brown PB, McIntyre S, Nixon TW, Behar KL, Rothman DL (2006) Magn Reson Med 56:386–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Drebin RA, Carpenter L, Hanrahan P (1988) Volume rendering. Comput Graph 22(4):65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eddie Y, Ng K, Chen Y (2006) Segmentation of the breast thermogram: improved boundary detection with the modified snake algorithm. J Mech Med Biol 6(2):123–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fernandez-Seara MA, Techawiboonwong A, Detre JA et al (2006) MR susceptometry for measuring global brain oxygen extraction. Magn Reson Med 55:967.73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gavrila DM, Daimler-Benz AG (1998) “Multi-feature Hierarchical Template Matching Using Distance Transforms”,IEEE International Conference on Pattern RecognitionGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haacke EM, Ayaz M, Khan A et al (2007) Establishing a baseline phase behavior in magnetic resonance imaging to determine normal vs abnormal iron content in the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:256.64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR, Venkatesan R (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging:physical principles and sequence design. Wiley, USA, pp 129–133Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR, Venkatesan R (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging:physical principles and sequence design. Wiley, USA, pp 118–123Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haacke EM, Lai S, Reichenbach JR et al (1997) In vivo measurement of blood oxygen saturation using magnetic resonance imaging: a direct validation of the blood oxygen level-dependent concept in functional brain imaging. Human Brain Mapp 5:341–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hanrahan P (1990) Three-pass affine transforms for volume rendering. Computer Graph 24(5):71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hemachande S, Verma A, Arora S, Panigrahi PK (2007) Locally adaptive block thresholding method with continuity constraint. Pattern Recogn Lett 28:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hu J, Yu Y, Juhasz C et al (2008) MRsusceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) complements conventional contrast enhanced T1 weighted MRI in characterizing brain abnormalities of Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:300.07Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kang DJ, In Kweon S (1999) A fast and stable snake algorithm for medical images. Pattern Recogn Lett 20(10):1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kang CC, Wang WJ (2007) A novel edge detection method based on maximization of the objective function. Pattern Recogn 40(2):609–618MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kass M, Witkin A (1988) Demetri terzopoulos active contour models. Int J Comput Vis 1:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kingsley PB (1999) Concepts in Magn Reson 11:29–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koopmans PJ, Manniesing R, Niessen WJ, et al. (2008) MR venography of the human brain using susceptibility weighted imaging at very high field strength.MAGMA 21:149 .58. Epub 2008 Jan 11Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Levoy M (1988) Volume rendering, display of surface from volume data. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 8(5):29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li W, Zhou C, Zhang Z (2004) Segmentation of the body of the tongue based on the improved snake algorithm in traditional Chinese medicine. In Proc. of the 5th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, pp. 15–19Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Muerle JL, Allen DC (1968) Experimental evaluation of a technique for automatic segmentation of objects in complex scenes. IPPR, ThopmsonGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Otsu N (1979) A thresholding selection method from gray-scale histogram. In IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics 9(1):62–66MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pippa Storey, PhD, Alexis A. Thompson, Christine L. Carqueville, BA, John C. Wood, R. Andrew de Freitas, and Cynthia K. Rigsby (2007) R2* Imaging of Transfusional Iron Burden at 3T and Comparison with 1.5T, J Magn Reson Imaging 25, pp.540–547Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pizer SM, Johnston RE, Ericksen JP, Yankaskas BC, Muller KE (1990) “Contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization: speed and effectiveness,” Visualization in Biomedical Computing, pp.337-345Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rafael C. Gonzalez and Paul Wintz (1993) Digital Image Processing, 3rd Ed., Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reichenbach JR, Venkatesan R, Schillinger DJ et al (1997) Small vessels in the human brain: MR venography with deoxyhemoglobin as an intrinsic contrast agent. Radiology 204:272–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Artaud D, Deschildre F, Duhamel A (1996) Diffuse infiltrative lung disease : Clinical value of sliding-thin-slab maximum intensity projection CT scans in the detection of mild micronodular patterns. Radiology 200:333–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rose J-L, Revol-Muller C, Almajdub M, Chereul E, Odet C (2007) “Shape prior integrated in an automated 3d region growing method,” in Image Processing, 2007. ICIP 2007. IEEE International Conference on, vol. 1, pp. 53–56Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rother C, Kolmogorov V, Blake A (2004) GrabCut: Interactive foreground extraction using iterated graph cuts. ACM Trans Graph 23(3):309–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shrager RI, Weiss GH, Spence RGS (1998) NMR Biomed 11:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thomas M. Murphy, Mark Math, and Leif H. Finkel (2003) "Curvature Covariation as a Factor of Perceptual Salience," International IEEE EMBS CNECI, pp. 16–19Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Umut Orguner, Fredrik Gustafsson (2007) “Statistical Characteristics of Harris Corner Detector”, IEEE/SP 14th Workshop, pp.571-575Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Unser M (1995) Texture classification and segmentation for using wavelet frames. IEEE Trans 4(11):1549–1560Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Williams D, Shah M (1992) A fast algorithm for active contours and curvature estimation. Comput Vis Graph Image Process: Image Underst 55:14–25zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zabih R, Kolmogorov V (2004) Spatially coherent clustering using graph cuts. In Proc Comput Vision Pattern Recognit 2:437–444Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sung-Jong Eun
    • 1
  • Hyeonjin Kim
    • 2
  • Jung-Wook Park
    • 3
  • Taeg-Keun Whangbo
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceGachon UniversitySeongnamSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Medical SciencesSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceYonsei UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations