Skip to main content
Log in

Fingerprint verification system based on curvelet transform and possibility theory

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fingerprint feature extraction step represents the success key of the fingerprint verification process. In a matching step, the good processing of those features would generate a measure that reflects more accurately the similarity degree between the input fingerprint and the template. In our study, we propose a novel fingerprint feature extraction method based on the Curvelet transform to reduce the dimensionality of the fingerprint image and to improve the verification rate. Like all extractors, the features which are generated by the Curvelet transform are usually imprecise and reflect an uncertain representation. Therefore, we proposed to analyze these features by a possibility theory to deal with imprecise and uncertain aspect in our novel fingerprint matching method. Thus, this paper focused on presenting a novel fingerprint features extraction method and a novel matching method. The features extraction method consists of two main steps: decompose the fingerprint image into a set of sub-bands by the Curvelet transform and extract the most discriminative statistical features of these sub-bands. A possibility based representation of those statistical features would be achieved by a possibility theory. So, the proposed fingerprint matching method is based on the use of the possibility theory as a global framework, including knowledge representation (as a possibility measure); in order to build a possibility fingerprint knowledge basis to be exploited in order to make a fingerprint verification decision. An extensive experimental evaluation shows that the proposed fingerprint verification approach is effective in terms of fingerprint image representation and possibility verification reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhanu B, Tan X (2003) Fingerprint indexing based on novel features of minutiae triplets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 25(5):616–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boer JD, Bazen AM, Gerez SH (2001) Indexing fingerprint database based on multiple features. In: Proceedings of the ProRISC, 12th annual workshop on circuits, systems and signal processing

  3. Candes E (1998) Ridgelets: theory and applications. Ph.D. thesis, Department of statistics, Stanford University

  4. Candès E, Demanet L, Donoho D (2006) Fast discrete curvelet transforms. Multiscale Model Simul 5(3):861–899

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Candès E, Donoho DL (1999) Curvelets—a surprisingly effective nonadaptive representation for objects with edges. In: Cohen A, Rabut C, Schumaker LL (eds) Curve and surface fitting: Saint-Malo 1999. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chikkerur S, Govindaraju V (2005) Fingerprint image enhancement using STFT analysis. International Workshop on Pattern Recognition for Crime Prevention, Security and Surveillance, ICAPR

  7. Dubois D, Prade H (1985) Thèorie des possibilités. Masson, Paris

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubois D, Prade H (1988) Representation and combinaison of uncertainty with belief functions and possibility measures. Comput Intell 4:244–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guesmi H, Trichili H, Alimi AM, Solaiman B (2012) Curvelet transform-based features extraction for fingerprint identification. 7th IEEE International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG 2012), Darmstadt, Germany. Sept 06-07

  10. Guttman A (1984) R-trees: a dynamic index structure for spatial searching. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data. pp. 47–57

  11. Holzinger A, Stocker C, Peischl B, Simonic KM (2012) On using entropy for enhancing handwriting pre-processing. Entropy 14(11):2324–2350

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jain AK, Prabhakar S, Hong L (1999) A multichannel approach for fingerprint classification. In: IEEE Transactions On Image Processing 21(4)

  13. Jain AK, Prabhakar S, Hong L, Pankanti S (1999) FingerCode: a filterbank for fingerprint representation and matching. Proc IEEE Comput Soc Con/ Compurer Vision Partern Recognirion (CVPR) 2:187–193

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jeon B, Landgrebe D (1999) Decision fusion approach for multitemporal classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 37(3):1227–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu M, Jiang X, Kot AC (2007) Efficient fingerprint search based on database clustering. Pattern Recogn 40(6):1793–1803

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Maio D, Maltoni D, Jain AK, Prabhakar S (2003) Handbook of fingerprint recognition. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Nanni L, Lumini A (2006) Two-class fingerprint matcher. Pattern Recogn 39(4):714–716

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Nanni L, Lumini A (2007) A hybrid wavelet-based fingerprint matcher. Pattern Recogn 4011:3146–3151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rahman A, Fairhurst M (1998) A novel confidence-based framework for multiple expert decision fusion. Proceedings of the conference BMVC’98. University of Southampton, Royaume-Uni

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ross A, Jain A, Reismanb J (2003) A hybrid fingerprint matcher. Pattern Recogn 36:1661–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sasikala KR, Petrou M (2001) Generalised fuzzy aggregation in estimating the risk of desertification of a burned forest. Dans Fuzzy Sets Syst 118(1):121–137

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Semler L, Dettori L (2006) Curvelet-based texture classification of tissues in computed tomography. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Atlanta, GA, 8-11 Oct

  23. Solaiman B, Pierce LE, Ulaby FT (1999) Multisensor data fusion using fuzzy concepts: application to land-cover classification using ERS-1/JERS-1 SAR composites. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 37(3):1316–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tang T (2012) Fingerprint recognition using wavelet domain features. 8th International Conference on Natural Computation (ICNC 2012), Chongqing, Sichuan, China, 29 May - 31 May

  25. Yager RR (1982) Levels sets for membership evaluation of fuzzy subsets. In: Yager RR (ed) Fuzzy sets and possibility theory: recent developments. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 90–97

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yang JC, Park DS (2008) A fingerprint verification algorithm using tessellated invariant moment features. Neurocomputing 71:1939–1946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:3–28

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Zahzah E (1992) Contribution à la Représentation des connaissances et à leur utilisation pour l’Interprétation Automatique des Images Satellite, Thèse de 3ème cycle présentée devant l’Université Paul Sabatier. Toulouse

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanene Guesmi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guesmi, H., Trichili, H., Alimi, A.M. et al. Fingerprint verification system based on curvelet transform and possibility theory. Multimed Tools Appl 74, 3253–3272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1785-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1785-1

Keywords

Navigation