Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 74, Issue 19, pp 8365–8378 | Cite as

Multimedia content adaptation service discovery mechanism

  • J. H. Abawajy
  • F. Fudzee
  • M. M. Deris
Article

Abstract

Electronic information is becoming increasingly rich in content and varied in format and style while at the same time client devices are getting increasingly varied in their capabilities. This mismatch between rich contents and the end devices capability presents a challenge in providing seamless and ubiquitous access to electronic documents to interested users. Service-oriented content adaptation has emerged as a potential solution to the content-device mismatch problem. Since an adaptation task can potentially be performed by multiple content adaptation services (CAS), an approach for CAS discovery is a fundamental component of service-oriented content adaptation environment. In this paper, we propose a service discovery approach that considers the client device capability and the service’s attributes to discover appropriate CAS while optimizing performance and functionality. The efficiency of the proposed CAS discovery protocol is studied experimentally. The results show that the proposed discovery approach is effective in terms of discovering appropriate content adaptation services.

Keywords

Service-oriented content adaptation Distributed systems QoS Adaptation task Service discovery SLA 

References

  1. 1.
    Azhan N, Hui S, Imran G, Izzuddin T (2007) Using service-based content adaptation platform to enhance mobile user experience. Proceedings of the 4th Int. Conf. on Mobile Technology and Applications, Singapore, 10–12 September. ACM Press, New York, pp. 552–557Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eder H, Wei F (2009) Evaluation of skyline algorithms in PostgreSQL. Proceedings of IDEAS, Italy, 16–18 September, pp. 334–337. ACM Press, New York. (Public dataset generator available at: http://skyline.dbai.tuwien.ac.at)
  3. 3.
    Fawaz Y, Berhe G, Brunie L, Scuturici V-M, Coquil D (2008) Efficient execution of service composition for content adaptation in pervasive computing. Int J Digit Multimed Broadcast 1–10Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fudzee MFM, Abawajy J (2011) A protocol for discovering content adaptation services. Lect Notes Comput Sci 7017:235–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Javadi B, Abawajy J, Akbari M (2008) An analytical model of interconnection networks for multi-cluster computing systems. Int J Concurr Comput Pract Exp 20(1):75–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kritikos K, Plexousakis D (2009) Requirements for QoS-based web service description and discovery. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 2(4):320–327CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kritikos K, Plexousakis D (2009) Mixed-integer programming for QoS-based web service matchmaking. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 2(2):122–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lai Y-C (2007) Two schedulers to provide delay proportion and reduce queuing delay simultaneously. Comput Netw 51(11):3220–3231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lemma S, Bekele D, Berhe G (2006) Semantic description of multimedia content adaptation web services. Adv Syst Comput Sci Softw Eng 25–31Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Md Fudzee M-F, Abawajy J (2010) Multi-criteria content adaptation service selection broker. Proceedings of CCGrids, Melbourne, 21–24 May. IEEE Press, New York, pp. 721–726Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Md Fudzee M-F, Abawajy J (2010) Request-driven cross-media content adaptation technique. In: Ragab K, Helmy T, Hassanien A (eds) Developing advanced web services through P2P computing and autonomous agents. IGI Global, HersheyGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Md Fudzee M-F, Abawajy J (2011) QoS-based adaptation service selection broker. Futur Gener Comput Syst 27(3):256–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meditskos G, Bassiliades N (2010) Structural and role-oriented web service discovery with taxonomies in OWL-S. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 22(2):278–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Merat S, Abdelhak A, Hamid A (2008) Content adaptation: requirements and architecture. Proceedings of the 10th iiWAS, Austria, 24–26 November. ACM Press, New York, pp. 626–629Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mohan R, John S, Li C-S (1999) Adapting multimedia internet content for universal access. IEEE Trans Multimed 1(1):104–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mokhtar S-B, Preuveneers D, Georgantas N, Issarny V, Berbers Y (2008) EASY: efficient semantic service discovery in pervasive computing environments with QoS and context support. J Syst Softw 81:785–808CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Plebani S-P, Pernici B (2009) URBE: web service retrieval based on similarity evaluation. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 21(11):1629–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosario S, Benveniste A, Haar S, Jard C (2008) Probabilistic QoS and soft contracts for transaction-based web services orchestrations. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 1(4):187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Song X, Dou W. A workflow framework for intelligent service composition. Advance Access published July 6, 2010,  10.1016/j.future.2010.06.008

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Parallel and Distributed Computing Lab, School of Information TechnologyDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Computer Science and Information TechnologyUniversiti Tun Hussein Onn MalaysiaBatu PahatMalaysia

Personalised recommendations