Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 73, Issue 3, pp 1361–1389 | Cite as

A threshold-adaptive film mode detection method in video de-interlacing

  • Weidong WangEmail author
  • Tao Nie
  • Zhipao Tu
  • Xiaohong Chen
  • Yuehai Wang
Article
  • 177 Downloads

Abstract

With the popularization of the network video, format conversion and de-interlacing are more required in video displaying and transmission. Field merge is perfect to de-interlace the film mode video sequence in which repeated fields or even/odd fields from the same film frame are contained. In this paper, inter-field difference is compared with a threshold, and repetition pattern of the result is utilized to determine the film mode. The threshold is set variable by tracking the local minimum difference of previous and subsequent fields. Film modes with repeated fields are identified using frame difference pattern. The 2-2 film mode is decided if forward and backward field differences jaggedly swing in opposite direction. Other film modes with fields from the same film frame are recognized by the combination of frame difference and forward field difference patterns. In this way, correct field merge is guaranteed after knowing which adjacent fields are decomposed from the same film frame. Experimental results show that various film modes in television systems, animations, camcorders and particularly interlaced network video can be correctly recognized by proposed method.

Keywords

Film mode detection De-interlacing Pull-down pattern Threshold-adaptive 

References

  1. 1.
    Brox P, Woestenberg L, De Haan G (2007) Local picture-repetition mode detector for video de-interlacing. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 53(4):1647–1655. doi: 10.1109/TCE.2007.4429265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen QB, Sun HB, Yang J, Zhang NN (2012) A robust film-mode detection approach for digital TV SoC design. In: IEEE international conference on solid-state and integrated circuit technology, pp 1–3. doi: 10.1109/ICSICT.2012.6466730
  3. 3.
    Christopher TJ, Correa C (1996) Method and apparatus for identifying video fields produced by film sources employing 2-2 and 3-2 pull down sequences. Assignee: Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., Indianapolis, Ind. United States Patent Office US 5563651, 8 Oct 1996Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Communications Specialties, Inc. (2009) HDTV standards and practices for digital broadcasting. Available from http://www.cncsi.com/down.aspx?file=files/HDTV01.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2012
  5. 5.
    Han SH, Kim HK, Lee YH, Yang SJ (2005) Converting the interlaced 3: 2 pulldown film to the NTSC video without motion artifacts. In: IEEE international conference on image processing 2(II-1054-7). doi: 10.1109/ICIP.2005.1530240
  6. 6.
    IDT (2012) Film cadence and video/film detection. Available from http://www.hqv.com/index.cfm?page=tech.cadence. Accessed 28 June 2012
  7. 7.
    Jia YW, Winger LL (2010) Unified approach to film mode detection. Assignee: LSI Corporation, Milpitas, CA (US). United States Patent Office US 7705913B2, 27 Apr 2010Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jia YW, Winger LL, Linzer EN (2007) Method for robust inverse telecine. Assignee: LSI Logic Corporation. United States Patent Office US 2007/0104273A1, 10 May 2007Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ku CC, Liang RK (2004) Robust layered film-mode source 3:2 pull down detection/correction. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 50(4):1190–1193. doi: 10.1109/TCE.2004.1362518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin SF, Chang YL, Chen LG (2003) Motion adaptive interpolation with horizontal motion detection for deinterlacing. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 49(4):1256–1265. doi: 10.1109/TCE.2003.1261227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    özer N et al (2010) Film mode detection through optimal successive mode elimination. Applicant: Vestel Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. 45030 Manisa(TR). European Patent Office EP 2265010A2, 22 Dec 2010Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schutten RJ, De Haan G (1998) Real-time 2-3 pull-down elimination applying motion estimation/compensation in a programmable device. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 44(3):930–938. doi: 10.1109/30.713216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Swan PL (2000) System and method for reconstructing non-interlaced captured content for display on a progressive screen. Assignee: ATI Technologies, inc., Thornhill, Canada. United States Patent Office US 6055018, 25 Apr 2000Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu D, Swartz P (1994) Television signal processing apparatus incorporating means for detecting 25 frame/second motion picture film sources in 50 Hz television signals. Applicant: Faroudja YC, 26595 Anacapa Drive, Los Altos Hills, CA 94022(US). World Intellectual Property Organization, International Publication Number: WO94/30006, 22 Dec 1994Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang S, Jung YY, Lee YH (2004) Motion compensation assisted motion adaptive interlaced-to-progressive conversion. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 14(9):1138–1148. doi: 10.1109/TCSVT.2004.833163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yuan Y, Liu YX, Liu ZH, Jiang XZ, Wang F (2012) A 2-2 pull-downed film mode detection and treatment method with scrolling subtitles. In: IEEE international symposium on broadband multimedia systems and broadcasting, pp 1–5. doi: 10.1109/BMSB.2012.6264277

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Weidong Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tao Nie
    • 1
  • Zhipao Tu
    • 1
  • Xiaohong Chen
    • 1
  • Yuehai Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Science and Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Information Network TechnologyZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations