Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 73, Issue 3, pp 1147–1176 | Cite as

Context-aware multimedia services modeling: an e-Health perspective

  • Md. Abdur RahmanEmail author
  • M. Shamim Hossain
  • Abdulmotaleb El Saddik
Article

Abstract

In this paper we present an e-Health framework model that can dynamically provide context-aware multimedia services to a user. The framework collects live user context by analyzing sensory data obtained from a body sensor network and multimedia content available from live heterogeneous Internet-based services. Finally, we share the implementation details and test results.

Keywords

Body sensor network e-Health Sensor networks Internet-based services User context Context modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Multimedia Communications Lab at the Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology of the Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany for collecting sensory data. The authors would also like to acknowledge the financial support of Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. The authors would like to thank Dr. Heung Nam Kim and Dr. Wail Gueaieb of MCRLab of University of Ottawa for their assistance. This research was supported by the NSTIP strategic technologies program (11-INF1703-10) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

References

  1. 1.
    An J, Pack S, An S, Kim M, Jeon Y (2009) “A novel service architecture for personalized context aware services,” in Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Advanced Communication Technology, 15–18 February, vol. 1, pp. 554–559Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    An X, Wang J (2006) “Opt: online person tracking system for context awareness in wireless personal network,” in ACM REALMAN, Florence, Italy, pp. 47–54Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aziz O et al (2007) “A pervasive body sensor network for measuring postoperative recovery at home”, in ACM IPSN. Ser J Surg Innov 14(2):83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bardram JE (2005) “Activity-based computing: support for mobility and collaboration in ubiquitous computing,” Pers. and Ubiquitous Comp., Springer-Verlag, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 312–322Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beutel J, Kasten O, Ringwald M (2003) “Btnodes a distributed platform for sensor nodes,” in ACM SenSys, Los Angeles, California, USA: ACM, pp. 292–293Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhardwaj S, Lee D-S, Mukhopadhyay SC, Chung W-Y (2008) Ubiquitous healthcare data analysis and monitoring using multiple wireless sensors for elderly person. Sensors Transducers J 90:87–99Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bottazzi D, Corradi A, Montanari R (2006) “Context-aware middleware solutions for anytime and anywhere emergency assistance to elderly people,” IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 82–90Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dey AK (2001) “Understanding and using context,” Personal Ubiquitous Comput., Springer-Verlag, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 4–7Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eisenman SB (2007) “The bikenet mobile sensing system for cyclist experience mapping,” in ACM SenSys, pp. 87–101Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    El Helou S, Salzmann C, Sire S, Gillet D (2009) “The 3A contextual ranking system: simultaneously recommending actors, assets, and group activities,” in Proc. 3rd ACM Conf. Recommender Systems, New York, USA, pp. 373–376, Oct. 22–25Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ganti RK, Yu-En T, Abdelzaher TF (2008) “SenseWorld: towards cyber-physical social networks,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 563–564Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gao T, Greenspan D, Welsh M (2005) “Improving patient monitoring and tracking in emergency response,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Information Communication Technologies in Health, JulGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gaonkar S, Li J, Choudhury RR, Cox L, Schmidt A (2008) “Micro-Blog: sharing and querying content through mobile phones and social participation,” in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Mobile systems, applications, and services, pp. 174–186Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gartrell CM, “SocialAware: context-aware multimedia presentation via mobile social networks,” University of Colorado. Master’s Thesis. [Online] Available: http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~rhan/Papers/Mike_Gartrell_CU_MS_thesis-final.pdf
  15. 15.
    Joly A, Maret P, Daigremont J (2009) Context-awareness, the missing block of social networking. Int J Comput Sci Appl, Technomath Res Found 6(2):50–65Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jovanov E et al (2003) Stress monitoring using a distributed wireless intelligent sensor system. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 22(3):49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kawahara Y, Kurasawa H, Morikawa H (2007) “Recognizing user context using mobile handsets with acceleration sensors,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Portable Information Devices, pp. 1–5, May 25–29Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Killworth P et al (1990) Estimating the size of personal networks. Soc Netw 12:289–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koolwaaij J, Wibbels M, Böhm S, Luther M (2009) “ContextKing: virtual kingdoms in real life,” in Proc. 1st IEEE Int. Conf. Games and Virtual Worlds, pp. 61–67, Mar. 23–24Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krco S (2004) “Health care sensor networks-architecture and protocols”. Ad Hoc Sensor Wirel Netw 1:1–25Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lam THW, Liu JNK (2008) “Modeling a personal profile by Fuzzy ontology map and its applications,” IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, June, pp. 414–421Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee C-S, Wang M-H, Acampora G, Loia V, Hsu C-Y (2009) “Ontology based intelligent fuzzy agent for diabetes application,” IEEE Symp. on Intelligent Agents, pp. 16–22Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nurmi P, Kukkonen J, Lagerspetz E, Suomela J, Floreen P. “Betelgeuse a tool for bluetooth data gathering,” Helsinki Institute for Information Technology (HIIT). [Online]. Available: http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/group/acs/betelgeuse/articles/betelgeusebodynets07.pdf
  24. 24.
    Ocampo R, Galis A, Todd C, De Meer H (2008) “Reasoner-based flow context aggregation,” in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Communications and Networking in China, 22–24 Aug., pp. 98–103Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Park S et al (2002) “Design of a wearable sensor badge for smart kindergarten,” in Proc. of the 6th Int. Symp. on Wearable Computers, pp. 231–238Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Phung D, Adams B, Tran K, Venkatesh S, Kumar M (2009) “High accuracy context recovery using clustering mechanisms,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Pervasive Computing and Communications, pp. 1–9, Mar. 9–13Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Quan TT, Hui SC, Fong ACM (2006) Automatic fuzzy ontology generation for semantic help-desk support. IEEE Trans Ind Informa 2(3):155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rahman Md A, Hamdan S, El Saddik A, Gueaieb W (2010) “Context-aware social networks mashup: a personalized web perspective,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC 2010), Austin, Tx, USA, May 3–6Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rahman Md A, El Saddik A, Gueaieb W (2010) Building dynamic social network from sensory data feed. IEEE Trans Instr Meas 59(5):1327–1341Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rahman Md A, El Saddik A, Gueaieb W (2011) Augmenting context-awareness by combining body sensor networks and social networks. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 60(2):345–353Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ryu H, Park I, Hyun SJ, Lee D (2007) A task decomposition scheme for context aggregation in personal smart space,” software technologies for embedded and ubiquitous systems, lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 20–29Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Santana PC, Rodríguez MD, González VM, Castro LA, Andrade ÁG (2005) “Supporting Emotional Ties among Mexican Elders and Their Families Living Abroad,” in Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Comp. Sys., pp. 2099–3003Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sarikaya S, Alim MA, Rezaei S (2006) “Integrating wireless EEGs into medical sensor networks,” ACM IWCMC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 1369–1373Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schmitt L, Falck T, Wartena F, Simons D (2007) “Novel ISO/IEEE 11073 standards for personal telehealth systems interoperability,” Joint Workshop on High Confidence Medical Devices, Software, and Systems and Medical Device Plug-and-Play Interoperability, pp. 146–148Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smith KP, Christakis NA (2008) “Social networks and health”. Annu Rev Sociol 34:405–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Upendra R, Max O (2008) “Predicting network availability using user context,” in Proc. of the 5th Annual Int. Conf. on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems, pp. 1–8Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wu WH (2008) MEDIC: medical embedded device for individualized care. J Artif Intell Med, Elsevier 42(2):137–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wyatt D et al (2008) “Towards automated social analysis of situated speech data,” in Proc. Ubicomp, vol. 344, pp. 168–171Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yang BH, Rhee S (2000) Development of the ring sensor for healthcare automation. Robot Auton Syst 30:273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yao J, Warren S (2005) “Applying the ISO/IEEE 11073 standards to wearable home health monitoring systems”. J Clin Monit Comput, Springer 19:427–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Md. Abdur Rahman
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Shamim Hossain
    • 2
  • Abdulmotaleb El Saddik
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUmm Al-Qura UniversityMakkahKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  2. 2.College of Computer and Information Sciences (CCIS)King Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.Multimedia Communications Research Laboratory (MCRLab) SITEUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations