Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 73, Issue 3, pp 1843–1862 | Cite as

A blending method based on partial differential equations for image denoising

  • Ali Abdullah YahyaEmail author
  • Jieqing Tan
  • Min Hu


In this paper we proposed a new de-noising technique based on combination of isotropic diffusion model, anisotropic diffusion (PM) model, and total variation model. The proposed model is able to be adaptive in each region depending on the information of the image. More precisely, the model performs more diffusion in the flat areas of the image, and less diffusion in the edges of the image. And so we can get rid of the noise, and preserve the edges of the image simultaneously. To verify that, we did several experiments, which showed that our algorithm is the best method for edge preserving and noise removing, compared with the isotropic diffusion, anisotropic diffusion, and total variation methods.


Isotropic diffusion (ID) model PM model TV model image features 


  1. 1.
    Andreu F, Mazón JM, Moll JS (2005) The total variation flow with nonlinear boundary conditions. Asymptotic Anal 43(1–2):9–46zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aubert G, Kornprobst P (2006) Mathematical Problems in Image Processing PDEs and the Calculus of Variations, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck A, Teboulle M (2009) Fast gradient-based algorithms for constrained total variation image denoising and deblurring problems. IEEE T Image Process 18(11):2419–2434CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bijaoui A (2002) wavelets, gaussian mixtures and wiener filtering. Signal Process 82(4):709–712CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Catté F, Lions P-L, Morel J-M, Coll T (1992) Image selective smoothing and edge detection by nonlinear diffusion. SIAM J Numer Anal 29(1):182–193CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang SG, Yu B, Vetterli M (2000) Spatially adaptive wavelet thresholding with context modeling for image denoising. IEEE T Image Process 9(9):1522–1531CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chatterjee P, Milanfar P (2010) Is denoising dead? IEEE T Image Process 19(4):895–911CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gallouët T, Herbin R (2004) Convergence of linear finite elements for diffusion equations with measure data. Comptes Rendus Mathematique 338(1):81–84CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garamendi JF, Gaspar FJ, Malpica N, Schiavi E (2013) Box relaxation schemes in staggered discretizations for the dual formulation of total variation minimization. IEEE T Image Process 22(5):2030–2043CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gilboa G, Sochen N, Zeevi YY (2002) Forward-and-backward diffusion processes for adaptive image enhancement and denoising. IEEE T Image Process 11(7):689–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guo Z, Sun J, Zhang D, Wu B (2012) Adaptive Perona-Malik model based on the variable exponent for image denoising. IEEE T Image Process 21(3):958–967CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kannan K, Perumal SA, Arulmozhi K (2010) Optimal decomposition level of discrete, stationary and dual tree complex wavelet transform for pixel based fusion of multi-focused Images. Serbian J Elec Eng 7(1):81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li F, Gao F, Cai N (2011) A new algorithm for removing salt and pepper noise from images. J Inform Comput Sci 8(16):3819–3825Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu J, Gao F, Li Z (2011) A model of image denoising based on partial differential equations. The Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Technology (ICMT), China, 26–28 July 2011. pp 1892–1896Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lysaker M, Lundervold A, Tai X-C (2003) Noise removalusing fourth-order partial differential equation with application to medical magnetic resonance images in space and time. IEEE T Image Process 12(12):1579–1590CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lysaker M, Osher S, Tai X-C (2004) Noise removalusing smoothed normals and surface fitting. IEEE T Image Process 13(10):1345–1357CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lysaker M, Tai X-C (2006) Iterative image restoration combining total variation minimization and a second-order functional. Int J Comput Vision 66(1):5–18CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mendrik AM, Vonken EJ, Rutten A, Viergever MA, Ginneken B (2009) Noise reduction in computed tomography scans using 3-D anisotropic hybrid diffusion with continuous switch. IEEE T Med Imaging 28(10):1585–1594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perona P, Malik J (1987) Scale space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. Proc. IEEE Comp. Soc. Workshop on Computer Vision (Miami Beach, Nov. 30–Dec. 2, 1987), IEEE Computer Society Press. Washington, pp 16–22Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Perona P, Malik J (1988) A network for multiscale image segmentation, Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits and Systems (ISCAS-88, Espoo, June 7–9 1988), pp 2565–2568Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Perona P, Malik J (1990) Scale space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE T Pattern Anal 12(7):629–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Portilla J, Strela V, Wainwright MJ, Simoncelli EP (2003) Image denoising using scale mixtures of gaussians in the wavelet domain. IEEE T Image Process 12(11):1338–1351CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ram I, Elad M, Cohen I (2011) Generalized Ttree-based wavelet transform. IEEE T Signal Proces 59(9):4199–4209CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rudin L, Osher S, Fatemi E (1992) Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Phisica D 60(1–4):259–268CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Scherzer O, Weickert J (2000) Relations between regularization and diffusion filter. J Math Imaging Vis 12(1):43–63CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sorzanoa COS, Ortiza E, Lóezc M, Rodrigod J (2006) Improved bayesian image denoising based on wavelets with applications to electron microscopy. Pattern Recogn 39(6):1205–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tikhonov AN, Arsenin VY (1977) Solutions of Ill-Posed problem. Winston and Sons, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE T Image Process 13(4):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weickert J (1998) Anisotropic Diffusion in Image Processing, University of Copenhagen Denmark PressGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Witkin AP (1983) Scale-space filtering. 8th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol 2. Karlsruhe, West Germany, pp 1019–1022Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yahya AA, Tan J (2012) A novel partial differential equation method based on image features and its applications in denoising. In: The Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Digital Home (ICDH), Guangzhou, China, 23–25 Nov 2012, pp 46–51Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang X, Wang R, Jiao LC (2011) Partial differential equation model method based on image feature for denoising. In: The Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Multi-Platform/Multi-Sensor Remote Sensing and Mapping (M2RSM), China, pp 1–4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer and InformationHefei University of TechnologyHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations