Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 71, Issue 1, pp 77–95 | Cite as

Learning beyond books—strategies for ambient media to improve libraries and collaboration spaces as interfaces for social learning

  • Mark BilandzicEmail author
  • Marcus Foth
Article

Abstract

With the advent of digital media and online information resources, public libraries as physical destinations for information access are being increasingly challenged. As a response, many libraries follow the trend of removing bookshelves in order to provide more floorspace for social interaction and collaboration. Such spaces follow a Commons 2.0 model: they are designed to support collaborative work and social learning. The acquisition of skills and knowledge is facilitated as a result of being surrounded by and interacting with a community of likeminded others. Based on the results of a case study on a Commons 2.0 library space, this paper describes several issues of collaboration and social learning in public library settings. Acknowledging the significance of the architectural characteristics of the physical space, we discuss opportunities for ambient media to better reflect the social attributes of the library as a place; i.e. amplify the sense of other co-present library visitors and provide opportunities for shared encounters and conversations, which would remain invisible otherwise. We present the design of a user check-in system for improving the library as a physical destination for social learning, sharing, and inspiration for and by the community.

Keywords

Commons 2.0 Library design e-Library Bookless library Coworking Collaboration Social learning Co-presence Shared encounters Serendipity Urban informatics Ambient media Embodied interaction Locative media 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ronald Schroeter, Daniel Johnson, and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on earlier versions of this paper. Further thanks goes to Mark Graham Jones for his help with the conceptualisation and early prototyping of the check-in system.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander C, Ishikawa S, Silverstein M (1977) A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. Center for Environmental Structure series, vol v. 2. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson C (2006) The long tail: why the future of business is selling less of more, 1st edn. Hyperion, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson B (2006) Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso BooksGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bilandzic M, Foth M (2012) A review of locative media, mobile and embodied spatial interaction. Int J Hum Comput Stud 70(1):66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bilandzic M, Venable J (2011) Towards participatory action design research: adapting action research and design science research methods for urban informatics. Journal of Community Informatics Special Issue: Research in Action: Linking Communities and Universities 7(3)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bilandzic M, Foth M, De Luca A (2008) CityFlocks: designing social navigation for urban mobile information systems. In: Marsden G, Ladeira I, Kotzé P (eds) Proceedings ACM SIGCHI designing interactive systems (DIS). Cape Town, South Africa, pp 174–183Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Björneborn L (2008) Serendipity dimensions and users’ information behaviour in the physical library interface. Inf Res 13(1):370Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Björneborn L (2010) Design dimensions enabling divergent behaviour across physical, digital, and social library interfaces. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Persuasive Technology, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brand S (1994) How buildings learn: what happens after they’re built. Viking, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burgess JE, Foth M, Klaebe HG (2006) Everyday creativity as civic engagement: a cultural citizenship view of new mediaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Caldwell G, Bilandzic M, Foth M (2012) Towards visualising people’s ecology of hybrid personal learning environments. Paper presented at the Media Architecture Biennale 2012, Godsbanen, Aarhus, Denmark, 15–17 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Certeau MD, Rendall S (1984) The practice of everyday life. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Churchill E, Nelson L, Denoue L, Murphy P, Helfman J (2003) The plasma poster network. In: O’Hara K, Perry M, Churchill E, Russell D (eds) Public and situated displays: social and interactional aspects of shared display technologies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Botton A (2006) The architecture of happiness. Hamish Hamilton, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dieberger A (1995) Providing spatial navigation for the World Wide Web. In: Frank AU, Kuhn W (eds) Spatial information theory, proceedings of Cosit ’95. Springer, Semmering, pp 93–106Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dieberger A (1997) Supporting social navigation on the world-wide web. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, special issue on innovative applications of the Web 46:805–825Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dourish P (2001) Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dourish P, Chalmers M (1994) Running out of space: models of information navigation. Paper presented at the HCI’94, Glasgow, UKGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eagle N (2004) Can Serendipity be planned? MIT Sloan Management Review 46(1):9–14Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eagle N, Pentland A (2005) Social serendipity: mobilizing social software. IEEE Pervasive Comput 4(2):28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ebner M, Holzinger A, Catarci T (2005) Lurking: an underestimated human–computer phenomenon. Multimedia, IEEE 12(4):70–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Falk J, Redstroem J, Bjoerk S (1999) Amplifying reality. In: Handheld and ubiquitous computing. Springer, pp 274–279Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Foth M, Choi JH, Bilandzic M, Satchell C (2008) Collective and network sociality in an urban village. ACM, pp 179–183Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Foth M, Forlano L, Satchell C, Gibbs M (eds) (2011) From social butterfly to engaged citizen: urban informatics, social media, ubiquitous computing, and mobile technology to support citizen engagement. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Foth M, Odendaal N, Hearn GN (2007) The view from everywhere: towards an epistemology for urbanites. Academic Conferences Limited, p 127Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goffman E (1966) Behavior in public places: notes on the social organization of gatherings. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gordon E, de Souza e Silva A (2011) Net locality: why location matters in a networked world. Blackwell-Wiley, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Greenberg S, Rounding M (2001) The notification collage: posting information to public and personal displays. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Seattle, Washington, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Guzman ESD, Yau M, Gagliano A, Park A, Dey AK (2004) Exploring the design and use of peripheral displays of awareness information. Paper presented at the CHI ’04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hansen M (2011) Speed vest. http://makeprojects.com/Project/Speed-Vest/1344/1. Accessed 7 December 2011
  31. 31.
    Harrison S, Dourish P (1996) Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, pp 67–76Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hartwig S (2006) Empty Seats traveling: next-generation ridesharing and its potential to mitigate traffic- and amission problems in the 21st century. Nokia Research Center, NRC-TR-2007-003Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hazlewood WR, Connelly K, Makice K, Lim Y-K (2008) Exploring evaluation methods for ambient information systems. Paper presented at the CHI ’08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, Florence, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Holgar M, Foth M, Ferrero-Regis T (2009) Fashion as a communication medium to raise environmental awareness and sustainable practiceGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Höök K, Benyon D, Munro AJ (2003) Designing information spaces: the social navigation approach. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Humphreys L (2010) Mobile social networks and urban public space. New Media Soc 12(5):763–778. doi: 10.1177/1461444809349578 CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jaokar A, Fish T (2006) Mobile Web 2.0: the innovator’s guide to developing and marketing next generation wireless mobile applications. Futuretext, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jenkins H (2006) Fans, bloggers, and gamers: exploring participatory culture. NYU PressGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kjeldskov J, Paay J (2005) Just-for-us: a context-aware mobile information system facilitating sociality. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Proceeding of the 7th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices & services table of contents Vol. 111:23–30Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kolbitsch J, Maurer H (2006) The transformation of the web: how emerging communities shape the information we consume. J Univ Comput Sci 12(2):187–213Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lawson B (2012) Language of space. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lefebvre H (1991) The production of space (trans: Nicholson-Smith D). Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lindahl C, Blount E (2003) Weblogs: simplifying web publishing. Computer 36(11):114–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lugmayr A, Risse T, Stockleben B, Laurila K, Kaario J (2009) Semantic ambient media—an introduction. Multimedia Tools Appl 44(3):337–359. doi: 10.1007/s11042-009-0282-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mankoff J, Dey AK, Hsieh G, Kientz J, Lederer S, Ames M (2003) Heuristic evaluation of ambient displays. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    McCarthy JF (2003) Promoting a sense of community with ubiquitous peripheral displays. In: O’Hara K, Perry M, Churchill E, D Russell (eds) Public and situated displays. Kluwer, pp 283–308Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    McDonald A (2006) The ten commandments revisited: the qualities of good library space. LIBER Q 16(2):104–119Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Milgram S (1992) The familiar stranger: an aspect of urban anonymity. In: Sabini J, Silver M (eds) The individual in a social world. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 68–71Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Motschnig-Pitrik R, Holzinger A (2002) Student-centered teaching meets new media: concept and case study. Educ Technol Soc 5(4):160–172Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Niegaard H, Lauridsen J, Schulz K (2009) Library space: inspiration for buildings and design. Danmarks BiblioteksforeningGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nischelwitzer A, Lenz FJ, Searle G, Holzinger A (2007) Some aspects of the development of low-cost augmented reality learning environments as examples for future interfaces in technology enhanced learning. Univ Access Hum-Comput Interact Appl Serv 728–737Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Norman DA (1999) Affordance, conventions, and design. Int J Hum Comput Stud 6(3):38–41Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Norman DA (2010) Living with complexity. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    O’Reilly T (2005) What is Web 2.0—design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html. Accessed 20.04.2007
  55. 55.
    Paulos E, Goodman E (2004) The familiar stranger: anxiety, comfort, and play in public places. ACM, pp 223–230Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rogers Y, Hazlewood W, Marshall P, Dalton N, Hertrich S (2010) Ambient influence: can twinkly lights lure and abstract representations trigger behavioral change? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
  58. 58.
    Scheible J, Ojala T (2009) MobiSpray: mobile phone as virtual spray can for painting BiG anytime anywhere on anything. Leonardo 42(4):332–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Scherr R (2006) The synthetic city: excursions into the real-not real. Places: Forum Des Publ Realm Media and the City 18(2):6Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Schroeter R, Houghton K (2011) Neo-planning: location-based social media to engage Australiaís new digital locals. In: Planning Institute of Australia National Conference 2011, Planning Institute of Australia, Hobart, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Sinclair B (2007) Commons 2.0: library spaces designed for collaborative learning. EDUCAUSE Q Mag 30 (4)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sommer R (1969) Personal space: the behavioral basis of design. Spectrum book. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Tuan Y-F (1977) Space and place: the perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Unconventionbrisbane (2010) The Edge. http://www.unconventionbrisbane.com/the-edge-53. Accessed 17 June 2010
  65. 65.
    Veerasawmy R, Ludvigsen M (2010) Designing technology for active spectator experiences at sporting events. Paper presented at the OzCHI 2010, Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Villareal L (2004) Supercluster. http://www.villareal.net/project_3.html. Accessed March 21 2011
  67. 67.
    Vygotsky L (1978) Mind in society. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wertsch JV (1997) Vygotsky and the formation of the mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Willis K (2010) Shared encounters. Computer supported cooperative work. Springer-Verlag New York Inc., LondonGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wired (1998) Love: Japanese style. http://wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/1998/06/12899. Accessed 7 March 2011
  71. 71.
    Wisneski C, Ishii H, Dahley A, Gorbet M, Brave S, Ullmer B, Yarin P (1998) Ambient displays: turning architectural space into an interface between people and digital information. In: CoBuild ’98. Springer, p 22Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Design, Urban Informatics Research LabQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations