Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A novel framework for automatic 3D face recognition using quality assessment

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quality of biometric samples plays an important role in biometric authentication systems because it has a direct impact on verification or identification performance. In this paper, we present a novel 3D face recognition system which performs quality assessment on input images prior to recognition. More specifically, a reject option is provided to allow the system operator to eliminate the incoming images of poor quality, e.g. failure acquisition of 3D image, exaggerated facial expressions, etc.. Furthermore, an automated approach for preprocessing is presented to reduce the number of failure cases in that stage. The experimental results show that the 3D face recognition performance is significantly improved by taking the quality of 3D facial images into account. The proposed system achieves the verification rate of 97.09% at the False Acceptance Rate (FAR) of 0.1% on the FRGC v2.0 data set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Besl P, McKay H (1992) A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14(2):239–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bowyer KW, Chang K, Flynn P (2006) A survey of approaches and challenges in 3D and multi-modal 3D + 2D face recognition. Comput Vis Image Underst 101(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang KI, Bowyer KW, Flynn PJ (2005) Adaptive rigid multi-region selection for handling expression variation in 3D face recognition. In: Proc. IEEE conf. on computer vision and pattern recognition, vol 3, pp 157–164, June

  4. Chang KI, Bowyer KW, Flynn PJ (2005) An evaluation of multimodal 2D+3D face biometrics. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 27(4):619–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook J, Chandran V, Fookes C (2006) 3D face recognition using Log-Gabor templates. In: Proc. British machine vision conference

  6. Duda R, Hart P, Stork D (2000) Pattern classification. Wiley-Interscience

  7. Faltemier T, Bowyer KW, Flynn PJ (2008) A region ensemble for 3-D face recognition. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Security 3(1):62–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Garcia-Romero D, Fierrez-Aguilar J, Gonzalez-Rodriguez J, Ortega-Garcia J (2004) On the use of quality measures for text-independent speaker recognition. In: ODYSSEY04-the speaker and language recognition workshop, pp 105–110

  9. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2002) Digital image processing, 2 edn. Prentice Hall

  10. Husken M, Brauckmann M, Gehlen S, der Malsburg CV (2005) Strategies and benefits of fusion of 2D and 3D face recognition. In: Proc. of IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition - workshops, p 174

  11. Kalka ND (2005) Image quality assessment for iris biometric. Master’s thesis, West Virginia University

  12. Lin W-Y, Chiu Y-L, Widder KR, Hu YH, Boston N (2010) Robust and accurate curvature estimation using adaptive line integrals. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2010:240309

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin W-Y, Wong K-C, Boston N, Hu YH (2006) Fusion of summation invariants in 3D human face recognition. In: Proc. IEEE conf. on computer vision and pattern recognition, vol 2, pp 1369–1376

  14. Lu X, Jain AK, Colbry D (2006) Matching 2.5D face scans to 3D models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28(1):31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maltoni D (2003) Handbook of fingerprint recognition. Springer

  16. Maurer T, Guigonis D, Maslov I, Pesenti B, Tsaregorodtsev A, West D, Medioni G, Geometrix I (2005) Performance of geometrix ActiveID 3D face recognition engine on the FRGC data. In: Proc. of IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition - workshops, p 154

  17. Mian A, Bennamoun M, Owens R (2007) An efficient multimodal 2D-3D hybrid approach to automatic face recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 29(11):1927–1943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Modi S, Elliott S (2006) Impact of image quality on performance: comparison of young and elderly fingerprints. In: Proc. 6th intl. conf. on recent advances in soft computing, pp 449–454

  19. Nandakumar K, Chen Y, Jain AK, Dass SC (2006) Quality-based score level fusion in multibiometric systems. In: Intl. conf. on pattern recognition, vol 4, pp 473–476

  20. Phillips JP, Moon H, Rizvi SA, Rauss PJ (2000) The FERET evaluation methodology for face-recognition algorithms. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(10):1090–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Phillips P, Flynn P, Scruggs T, Bowyer K, Chang J, Hoffman K, Marques J, Min J, Worek W (2005) Overview of the face recognition grand challenge. In: Proc. of IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, vol 1, pp 947–954

  22. Ross A, Jain AK (2003) Information fusion in biometrics. Pattern Recogn Lett 24(13):2115–2125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Russ T, Koch M, Little C (2005) A 2D range Hausdorff approach for 3D face recognition. In: IEEE conf. on computer vision and pattern recognition - workshops

  24. Shen L, Kot A, Koo W (2001) Quality measures of fingerprint images. In: Proc. third intl. conf. on audio-and video-based biometric person authentication, pp 266–271

  25. Simon-Zorita D, Ortega-Garcia J, Fierrez-Aguilar J, Gonzalez-Rodriguez J (2003) Image quality and position variability assessment in minutiae-based fingerprint verification. IEE Proc Vis Image Signal Process 150(6):402–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Turk M, Pentland A (1991) Eigenfaces for recognition. J Cognitive Neurosci 3(1):71–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wildes R (1997) Iris recognition: An emerging biometric technology. Proc IEEE 85(9):1348–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wong K, Lin W, Hu Y, Boston N, Zhang X (2007) Optimal linear combination of facial regions for improving identification performance. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part B 37(5):1138–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao W, Chellappa R, Phillips PJ, Rosenfeld A (2003) Face recognition: a literature survey. ACM Comput Surv 35(4):399–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan

    Wei-Yang Lin & Ming-Yang Chen

Authors
  1. Wei-Yang Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ming-Yang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-Yang Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, WY., Chen, MY. A novel framework for automatic 3D face recognition using quality assessment. Multimed Tools Appl 68, 877–893 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1092-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1092-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation