Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 55, Issue 3, pp 507–523 | Cite as

Traffic differentiation for BE users in CDMA 1xEVDO networks

  • Volkan SevindikEmail author
  • Oguz Bayat
  • Jay Weitzen
Article

Abstract

Different traffic types have different Quality of Service (QoS) requirements, which necessitate traffic prioritization enhancements in cellular networks. In CDMA2000 Evolution Data Optimized (EVDO) network, initial applications have been mainly focused on Best Effort (BE) traffic. Network operators observed that even though BE traffic users were the lowest priority users paying small subscription fees, they were heavily consuming the network resources. Therefore, operators demanded to charge BE users depending on their different levels of data usage. In this paper, we have designed a novel forward link (FL) scheduler to differentiate BE traffic users, and created new BE user classes with different throughput characteristics. Our new approach is called Inter-User Best Effort (IUBE) traffic classification and is implemented in CDMA2000 1xEVDO networks. The performance and characterization of designed scheduler is investigated through real network experiments conducted in live CDMA2000 1xEVDO network. TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) throughput measurements, received mobile terminal power, and signal-to-noise-plus-interference ratio (SNIR) were evaluated in the experiments. In conclusion, experimental data reveals that the average throughput value of a particular IUBE class user matches with its targeted IUBE class throughput value, and IUBE feature of CDMA2000 1xEVDO provides accurate traffic classification among BE traffic users in the cellular network.

Keywords

Wireless resource management CDMA2000 1xEVDO Best Effort Inter-User Best Effort Scheduling Measurement Real network data 

References

  1. 1.
    Andrews M (2001) Providing quality of service over a shared wireless link. IEEE Commun Mag 39(2):150–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bender P, Black P, Grob M, Padovani R, Sindhushayana N, Viterbi A (2000) CDMA/HDR: a bandwidth-efficient high-speed wireless data service for nomadic users. IEEE Commun Mag 70–77Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    CDMA2000 high rate packet data air interface specification. 3GPP2 C.S0024-A std. (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    How to ensure QoS in CDMA 2000 EVDO Rev A systems. QUALCOMM Inc. White Paper, March 2008. Online: http://www.cdg.org/news/events/cdmaseminar. Accessed 30 June 2010
  5. 5.
    Hui J, Devetsikiotis M (2004) CDMA2000 high rate packet data air interface specification. In: Proc. IEEE Globecom ’04Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Knopp R, Humblet PA (1995) Information capacity and power control in single-cell multiuser communications. In: Proc. IEEE ICC’95, vol 1, pp 331–335. Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rentel CH, Krzymien WA, Darian B, Vanghi V, Elliott R (2002) Comparative forward link traffic channel performance evaluation of HDR and 1XTREME systems. In: Proc. IEEE VTC’02, vol 1, pp 160–164. Birmingham, ALGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tse D, Viswanath P (2005) Fundamentals of wireless communication. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang SC (1999) CDMA RF system engineering. Artech HouseGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of MassachusettsLowellUSA
  2. 2.Ericsson UnitAirvana Inc.ChelmsfordUSA
  3. 3.Electrical and Electronics EngineeringYeni Yuzyil UniversityTopkapiTurkey
  4. 4.Airvana Inc.ChelmsfordUSA

Personalised recommendations