Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamic energy enabled differentiation (DEED) image watermarking based on human visual system and wavelet tree classification

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a novel dynamic energy enabled differentiation (DEED) watermarking algorithm based on the wavelet tree classification and human visual system (HVS). The wavelet coefficients of the image are divided into disjoint trees and a wavelet tree consists of 21 coefficients which are divided into 6 blocks. One watermark bit is embedded into one wavelet tree using the energy differentiation of positive and negative modulation between coefficients of each block. In addition, the contrast sensitive function (CSF) of human visual system is also considered for better weighting in watermarking since the wavelet coefficients across the subbands perform different characteristics and importance. As DEED still requires extra storage of side information during the extraction and results non-blind watermarking approach, a random direction differentiation approach called DEEDR is then proposed which is a truly blind watermarking technique. This study has performed intensive comparison for the proposed scheme with other tree energy differentiation based techniques like WTQ, ABW-TMD and WTGM under various geometric and nongeometric attacks. From the experimental results, the advantage of DEED based algorithms is not only with low complexity, but also outperforms WTGM and WTQ in terms of robustness and imperceptibility of watermarking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Otum HM, Samara NA (2006) Adaptive blind wavelet-based watermarking technique using tree mutual differences. J Electron Imaging 15(4):043011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beegan AP, Iyer LR, Bell AE (2002) Design and evaluation of perceptual masks for wavelet image compression. Proc. 10th IEEE Digital Signal Processing Workshop, pp. 88-93

  3. Cox IJ, Kilian J, Leighton FT, Shamoon T (1997) Secure spread spectrum watermarking for multimedia. IEEE Trans on Image Proc 6(12):1673–1687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Das TK, Maitra S (2004) Cryptanalysis of wavelet tree quantization watermarking scheme. IWDC 2004:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Das TK, Maitra S, Mitra J (2005) Cryptanalysis of optimal differential energy watermarking (DEW) and a modified robust scheme. IEEE Trans on Signal Proc 53(2):768–775

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Daubechies1 I, Sweldens W (1998) Factoring wavelet transforms into lifting steps. J Fourier Anal Appl 4(3):247–269

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huang BB, Tang SX (2006) A contrast-sensitive visible watermarking scheme. IEEE Multimedia 13(2):60–66

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kundur D, Hatzinakos D (1998) Digital watermarking using multiresolution wavelet decomposition. Proc IEEE ICASSP 5:2869–2972

    Google Scholar 

  9. Langelaar GC, Lagendijk RL (2001) Optimal differential energy watermarking of DCT encoded images and video. IEEE Trans on Image Proc 10(1):148–158

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu CS, Huang SK, Sze CJ, Liao HY (2000) Cocktail watermarking for digital image protection. IEEE Trans on Multimedia 2(4):209–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mannos JL, Sakrison DJ (1974) The effects of a visual fidelity criterion on the encoding of images. IEEE Trans on Info Theory 20(4):525–536

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Said A, Pearlman WA (1996) A new, fast, and efficient image codec based on set partitioning in hierarchical trees. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 6:243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. StirMark, [Online]: http://www.petitcolas.net/fabien/software/StirMarkBenchmark_4_0_129.zip

  14. Tsai M-J (2009) A visible watermarking algorithm based on the content and contrast aware (COCOA) technique. J Vis Commun Image Represent 20(5):323–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsai MJ, Lin CW (2008) Wavelet based multipurpose color image watermarking by using dual watermarks with human vision system models. IEICE E91-A(6):1426–1437

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tsai MJ, Shen CH (2007) Wavelet Tree Group Modulation (WTGM) for digital image watermarking. IEEE ICASSP2007 2:173–176

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tsai MJ, Shen CH (2008) Differential energy based watermarking algorithm using Wavelet Tree Group Modulation (WTGM) and human visual system. IEICE E91-A(8):1961–1973

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang SH, Lin YP (2002) Blind watermarking using wavelet tree quantization. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo 1:589–592

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang SH, Lin YP (2004) Wavelet tree quantization for copyright protection watermarking. IEEE Trans on Image Proc 13(2):154–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yong L, Cheng LZ, Xu ZH (2004) Translucent digital watermark based on wavelets and error-correct code. Chinese J of Computers 20(11):1533–1539

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers with their valuable comments to improve the quality of this manuscript and Bai-Jiun Chen at National Chiao Tung University who helps to write the programs for software experiments. This work is partially supported by the National Science Council in Taiwan, Republic of China, under Grant NSC96-2416-H009-015, NSC97-2410-H009-034 and 99-2918-1-009-008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min-Jen Tsai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsai, MJ. Dynamic energy enabled differentiation (DEED) image watermarking based on human visual system and wavelet tree classification. Multimed Tools Appl 52, 385–406 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-009-0422-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-009-0422-5

Keywords

Navigation